The Development of Malay-Javanese Traditional Medicine in Communities: Cultural Heritage Preservation and Policy Needs

Authors

Nurammar Salihin Noordin

Centre for the Study of Malay Language, Literature and Culture, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Malaysia (Malaysia)

Muammar Ghadaffi Hanafiah

Centre for the Study of Malay Language, Literature and Culture, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700930

Subject Category: Medicine

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 13649-13661

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-05

Accepted: 2026-08-10

Published: 2026-08-17

Abstract

Traditional medicine is not only a health-related practice but also a repository of inherited knowledge, values, skills, language and social memory. This article examines Malay-Javanese traditional medicine as living cultural heritage rather than as a clinical treatment system. It asks how such knowledge can remain socially meaningful while responding to changing generational expectations, documentation technologies and institutional policy. The study employs a qualitative documentary analysis supported by a comparative review of heritage and cultural-policy materials. Sources were selected purposively from peer-reviewed scholarship, academic books, official heritage instruments, legal and policy documents, and institutional materials concerning Malay-Javanese identity, Malay traditional medicine, intangible cultural heritage, cultural sustainability and traditional-knowledge governance. The material was interpreted using reflexive thematic analysis. Four interconnected themes were identified: transmission as the social infrastructure of living heritage; community agency as the basis of heritage legitimacy; cultural resilience through adaptation rather than fixity; and ethical governance of documentation, ownership and commercialisation. Comparative analysis of Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore further shows three complementary policy approaches: statutory recognition and documentation, community-centred cultural advancement and inventorying, and co-created heritage planning with youth and community capacity-building. Drawing these themes together, the article proposes a Community-Centred Living Heritage Sustainability Framework comprising five dimensions: transmission, community agency, cultural resilience, ethical governance and institutional support. The framework is intended as an analytical and policy tool rather than a clinically oriented model. The study concludes that safeguarding Malay-Javanese traditional medicine requires more than recording practices; it requires maintaining the social conditions through which communities can interpret, transmit, adapt and govern their knowledge. Because the study is document-based, its conclusions represent a thematic synthesis of available evidence and do not claim to reproduce the direct views of all Malay-Javanese communities.

Keywords

Malay-Javanese community, traditional medicine, intangible cultural heritage, cultural sustainability, cultural policy

Downloads

References

1. Beel, D. E., Wallace, C. D., Webster, G., Nguyen, H., Tait, E., Macleod, M., & Mellish, C. (2017). Cultural resilience: The production of rural community heritage, digital archives and the role of volunteers. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 459-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27- 40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of National Heritage Malaysia. (n.d.). Bahagian Warisan Tidak Ketara [Intangible Cultural Heritage Division]. Official Portal of the Department of National Heritage. https://heritage.gov.my/en/pengenalan-warisan-tidak-ketara.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Government of Indonesia. (2017). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan [Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 5 of 2017 on the Advancement of Culture]. Directorate General of Culture. https://kebudayaan.kemdikbud.go.id/salinan-uu-pemajuan-kebudayaan-ri-nomor-5-tahun-2017/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Government of Malaysia. (2005). National Heritage Act 2005 (Act 645). Department of National Heritage. https://www.heritage.gov.my/en/info-jwn/dasar-perundangan.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Haliza Mohd Riji. (2000). Prinsip dan amalan dalam perubatan Melayu. Penerbit Universiti Malaya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Harun Mat Piah. (2015). Ilmu perubatan Melayu tradisional dari naskhah-naskhah lama. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jandra, M., Djamil, A. S., Salamon, H., Ansyory, A., & Zein, M. D. (2016). Identity and culture change of Javanese in Johor. UMRAN - Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 3(3-1). https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2016.3n3-1.140 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. National Heritage Board Singapore. (2023). Our SG Heritage Plan 2.0. Government of Singapore. https://www.nhb.gov.sg/heritage-plan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. National Heritage Board Singapore. (n.d.). About intangible cultural heritage. Roots.sg. https://www.roots.gov.sg/ich-landing/about-intangible-cultural-heritage [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Soini, K., & Birkeland, I. (2014). Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum, 51, 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sunarti, L., & Fadeli, T. R. (2021). Preserving Javanese identity and cultural heritage in Malaysia. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), Article 1956068. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1956068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). Ethical principles for safeguarding intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO. https://ich.unesco.org/en/ethics-and-ich-00866 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023). Jamu wellness culture. Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/jamu-wellness-culture-01972 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. World Health Organization. (2025). Global traditional medicine strategy 2025-2034. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240113176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/en/web/traditional-knowledge/wipo-treaty-on-ip-gr-and-associated-tk [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2026). Status of the WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge. WIPO Lex. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/treaties/ShowResults?search_what=N&treaty_id=19830 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles