The Effect of Antenatal Education Provided by Nurses on Women’s Childbirth Preparedness and Outcomes: A Case Review of Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria - 2025

Authors

Blessing Nmesomachi Okorie

Imo State University, Owerri, Imo State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000061

Subject Category: Maternal and Child Health

Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 676-683

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-04

Accepted: 2026-03-12

Published: 2026-03-30

Abstract

Antenatal education provided by nurses is an essential component of quality maternal healthcare and has the potential to improve childbirth preparedness and maternal outcomes, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This review examines existing evidence on the effect of nurse-led antenatal education on women’s preparedness for childbirth, psychological readiness, and maternal and neonatal net results in relation to Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria. A narrative review of peer-reviewed literature published between 2014 and 2025 was conducted using major health and nursing databases. Findings indicate that antenatal education delivered by nurses improves women’s awareness of pregnancy and labor, reduces fear and anxiety associated with childbirth, increases confidence, and promotes positive health behaviors including facility-based delivery and early initiation of breastfeeding. However, the effectiveness of antenatal education is influenced by factors including the quality and uniformity of content, nurse training, workload, and cultural considerations. Strengthening nurse-led antenatal education through competency-based learning, continuous professional development, and supportive health policies could significantly improve maternal and neonatal end results in Owerri and similar environments.

Keywords

antenatal education; nurse-led care; childbirth preparedness; maternal outcomes

Downloads

References

1. Aborigo, R. A., Agyemang, S., & Moyer, C. A. (2024). Effect of structured antenatal education on childbirth knowledge in Ghana. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 112, 104352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afulani, P. A., Phillips, B. J., Aborigo, R. A., & Moyer, C. A. (2023). Person-centred antenatal care and childbirth preparedness in low- and middle-income countries. The Lancet Global Health, 11(4), e523–e533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00045-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bello, A. T., Umar, M. M., & Yusuf, S. (2024). Impact of antenatal education on neonatal outcomes in northern Nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 28(1), 12–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Eze, E. N., Onwujekwe, O., & Uzochukwu, B. (2023). Effect of nurse-led antenatal education on maternal anxiety and childbirth experience in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 26(7), 1018–1025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lumbiganon, P., Laopaiboon, M., Intarut, N., & Vogel, J. P. (2022). Antenatal education for increasing childbirth preparedness and improving maternal outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022(6), CD012624. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012624.pub2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mgaya, H. N., Msuya, S. E., & Mmbaga, B. T. (2022). Evaluation of antenatal education on labor preparedness in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22(1), 678. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Moola, S., Munn, Z., Tufanaru, C., Aromataris, E., Sears, K., Sfetcu, R., Currie, M., Lisy, K., Qureshi, R., & Mattis, P. (2020). Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] & ICF. (2023). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2023. NPC and ICF, Abuja, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Onasoga, O. A., Oluwatosin, O. A., & Okunola, R. A. (2023). Quality and challenges of antenatal education provided by nurses in Nigeria. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 13(2), 45–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Otieno, P., Karanja, R., & Nyamongo, I. (2023). Impact of childbirth education on facility delivery in Kenya. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 27(5), 789– 798. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Khalil, H. (2022). Chapter 11: Scoping reviews (2020 version). In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sharma, R., & Gupta, S. (2024). Psychological effects of antenatal education in South Asia. Asian Journal of Nursing, 18(1), 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Health Organization. (2023). Trends in maternal mortality 2000–2020: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group, and the United Nations Population Division. WHO Press, Geneva. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles