The Effect of Social Media Engagement on Cybersecurity Behavior among Students of Hei's
Authors
Student, Santo Tomas College of Agriculture Sciences and Technology (Philippines)
Student, Santo Tomas College of Agriculture Sciences and Technology (Philippines)
Student, Santo Tomas College of Agriculture Sciences and Technology (Philippines)
Instructor, Santo Tomas College of Agriculture Sciences and Technology (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400273
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 3696-3710
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-15
Accepted: 2026-04-20
Published: 2026-05-06
Abstract
Cybersecurity behavior refers to how a person acts to protect devices, accounts, and personal information when using the internet and technology. This study aims to determine the significant relationship between social media engagement and cybersecurity behavior among students of a Higher Education Institution (HEI). Data were gathered from 359 students of HIE’s in Santo Tomas, Davao del Norte. This study employed stratified random sampling and used quantitative, non-experimental research with a descriptive correlational design. The measurements used in this study were adapted from instruments that had been rigorously checked for accuracy and reference. The statistical tools used in this study were the mean and Pearson r. Findings showed that students exhibited high levels of social media engagement and cybersecurity behaviors, suggesting that these behaviors were often observed. The significance level of social media engagement among students of HEIs suggests that it has become a vital component of everyday academic and social lives. The strong connection between social media engagement and cybersecurity behavior suggests that higher social media engagement correlates with enhanced awareness and implementation of cybersecurity protocols.
Keywords
Social Media Engagement and Cybersecurity Behavior, Correlational Research Design, Philippines
Downloads
References
1. Adamczewska-Chmiel, K., Dudzic, K., Chmiela, T., & Gorzkowska, A. (2022). Smartphones, the epidemic of the 21st century: A possible source of addictions and neuropsychiatric consequences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Almansoori, A., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2023). Exploring the frontiers of cybersecurity behavior: A systematic review of studies and theories. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5700. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alsharida, R. A., Al-rimy, B. A. S., Al-Emran, M., & Zainal, A. (2023). A systematic review of multi perspectives on human cybersecurity behavior. Technology in society, 73, 102258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Arzmi, M. H. (2021). Scientific research misconducts: An overview. IIUM Journal of Orofacial and Health Sciences, 2(1), 1-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bokoh, M. A., Bello, M. M., & Idowu, A. A. (2022). Use of social media platforms for dissemination of information and creating awareness about library resources and services among students in Lagos State University, Nigeria. Library Philosophy & Practice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bonisteel, I., Shulman, R., Newhook, L. A., Guttmann, A., Smith, S., & Chafe, R. (2021). Reconceptualizing recruitment in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211042493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Brodowicz, M. (2024). Descriptive correlational design in research. Bhat, A. (2023). Descriptive correlational: Descriptive vs correlational research. Market Research: QuestionPro. https://www. questionpro. com/blog/descriptive-research-vs-correlational-research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cybersecurity Practices Among College Students: A Survey Study. In International Conference on MAchine inTelligence for Research & Innovations (pp. 147-159). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Davies, S. R., Wells, R., Zollo, F., & Roche, J. (2024). Unpacking social media'engagement': a practice theory approach to science on social media. Journal of Science Communication, 23(06). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Designing an Interactive Web-Based Social Media Platform for College Students. (2023). International Journal For Science Technology AndEngineering. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hurley, M., & Tenny, S. (2023). Mean. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. HWANG, H. J. (2023). The importance of anonymity and confidentiality for conducting survey research. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 4(1), 1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Jadhav, D. S. (2024). Social media content consumption patterns by UG students in Shivaji University, Kolhapur Campus. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Jiang, Q., Chen, Z., Zhang, Z., & Zuo, C. (2023). Investigating links between Internet literacy, Internet use, and Internet addiction among Chinese youth and adolescents in the digital age. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1233303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Journal of Philosophy, Culture & Political Science, 89(3). Davies, S. R.,Wells, R., Zollo, F., & Roche, J. (2024). Unpacking social media'engagement': a practice theory approach to science on social media. Journal of Science Communication, 23(06). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Karani, N. F., Sher, J., & Mophosho, M. (2022). The influence of screen time on children’s language development: A scoping review. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 69(1), 825. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kennison, S. M., & Chan-Tin, E. (2020). Taking risks with cybersecurity: Using knowledge and personal characteristics to predict self-reported cybersecurity behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 546546. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Kennison, S. M., & Chan-Tin, E. (2020). Taking risks with cybersecurity: Using knowledge and personal characteristics to predict self-reported cybersecurity behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 546546. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Kennison, S. M., & Chan-Tin, E. (2020). Taking risks with cybersecurity: Using knowledge and personal characteristics to predict self-reported cybersecurity behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 546546. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Khan, F., Arora, S., Pargaien, S., Pande, L., & Khati, K. (2023, September). Exploring the Relationship Between Digital Engagement and [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Kotronoulas, G., & Papadopoulou, C. (2023). A primer to experimental and nonexperimental quantitative research: the example case of Tobacco-Related Mouth Cancer. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 39(2), 151396. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Latih, R., & Zin, A. M. (2024). Cybersecurity behavior in the West Sumatra universities. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 8(3-2), 1976–1986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Molina, S., & Eduardo, J. (2023b). Paradigms and different types of research. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Mousavi, R., Chen, R., Kim, D. J., & Chen, K. (2020). Effectiveness of privacy assurance mechanisms in users' privacy protection on social networking sites from the perspective of protection motivation theory. Decision Support Systems, 135, 113323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Mousavi, R., Chen, R., Kim, D. J., & Chen, K. (2020). Effectiveness of privacy assurance mechanisms in users’ privacy protection on social networking sites from the perspective of protection motivation theory. Decision Support Systems, 135, 113323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Murdock, C. M., & Heidenreich, T. M. (2021). Mobile device usage across ages. Communication Complications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Nguyen, L. T., & Tuamsuk, K. (2024). Unveiling scientific integrity in scholarly publications: a bibliometric approach. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20, Article 16. DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00164-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Nguyen, T. D., Shih, M. H., Srivastava, D., Tirthapura, S., & Xu, B. (2021). Stratified random sampling from streaming and stored data. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 39(3), 665-710. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Ni, X., Shao, X., Geng, Y., Qu, R., Niu, G., & Wang, Y. (2020). Development of the social media engagement scale for adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 701. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Nob¹, J. M. R., & Tañola, M. (2024). “Ang Magturo ay Di Biro”: A Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study On The Lived-Experiences Of Math Educators In Out-Of-Field Teaching. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Nussipova, A. U., & Slanbekova, G. K. (2024). Social Media Landscape In The Republic Of Kazakhstan: Navigating Youth Behavior And Ensuring Information Security. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Obermayer, N., Kővári, E., Leinonen, J., Bak, G., & Valeri, M. (2022). How social media practices shape family business performance: The wine industry case study. European Management Journal, 40(3), 360–371. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Petropoulou, F. M., & Varouchas, E. (2024). Cracking the code: How social media and human behavior shape cybersecurity challenges. Human Factors in Cybersecurity, 127(127).* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Ruiz, A. P., & Cabigan, M. (2022). Social media engagement: Its relation to the psychosocial attributes of selected junior high school students. Social Media Engagement: Its Relation to the Psychosocial Attributes of Selected Junior High School Students, 104(1), 22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Ruiz, a. p., & cabigan, m. (2022). social media engagement: its relation to the psychosocial attributes of selected junior high school students. social media engagement: its relation to the psychosocial attributes of selected junior high school students, 104(1), 22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Sajikumar, S., & Ajithkumar, N. (2023). Understanding the emergence and significance of behavioral cybersecurity: A bibliometric analysis. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Schaltegger, T., Ambuehl, B., Bosshart, N., Bearth, A., & Ebert, N. (2025). Human behavior in cybersecurity: an opportunity for risk research. Journal of Risk Research, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Stewart, L. (2025, February 11). Understanding informed consent in research. ATLAS.ti. https://atlasti.com/research-hub/informed-consent-in-research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Tabuga, A. D., Umlas, A. J. L., Zuluaga, K. M. C., & Domingo, S. N. (2023). How social networks influence access and utilization of weather and climate information: The case of upland farming communities in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies Research Papers, 2023(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Titiakarawongse, C., & Boonkrong, S. (2023). A study of password management behaviors of young people. Applied Science and Engineering Progress, 16(4), 6580–6580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Tran, M. N., Hogg, L., & Marshall, S. (2022). Understanding postgraduate students’ perceptions of plagiarism: a case study of Vietnamese and local students in New Zealand. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1),3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Trepte, S., & Masur, P. K. (2023). Definitions of privacy. In The Routledge Handbook of Privacy and Social Media(pp. 3-15). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Tsindos, T. (2023, March 21). Chapter 29: Recruitment and sampling. Qualitative Research – a Practical Guide for Health and Social Care Researchers and Practitioners. https://oercollective.caul.edu.au/qualitative-research/chapter/__unknown__-29/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. VanBuren, J. M., Roalstad, S., Kay, M. T., Zuspan, S. J., Dean, J. M., & Brulotte, M. (2022). Development of a risk assessment and risk management tool for an academic research organization. Contemporary clinical trials, 119, 106812. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Weisburd, D., Britt, C., Wilson, D. B., & Wooditch, A. (2021). Measuring association for scaled data: Pearson’s correlation coefficient. In Basic statistics in criminology and criminal justice (pp. 479-530). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Wijayanto, H., & Prabowo, I. A. (2020). Cybersecurity vulnerability behavior scale in college during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), 9(3), 395–399.* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Wijayanto, H., & Prabowo, I. A. (2020). Cybersecurity vulnerability behavior scale in college during the covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study