The Effect of the Grammar Translation Method on Libyan Secondary School Students’ Communicative Competence

This study investigates the effect of the Grammar Translation Method (GTM) on the development of communicative competence among Libyan secondary school students. Despite global shifts toward communicative and skills-based approaches in English language teaching, many Libyan schools continue to rely heavily on GTM. The study employs a mixed-methods design incorporating speaking performance tasks and a student perception questionnaire. The participants were 45 third-year secondary students from two public schools in Msallata city: Rabia Al-Adawya Secondary School for Girls and Othman Al-Gezany Secondary School for Boys. Data analysis revealed that while students demonstrated relatively strong grammatical accuracy, their fluency, interaction, and overall communicative competence were limited. Questionnaire findings further indicated students’ dissatisfaction with the lack of speaking opportunities and their strong dependence on translation. The study concludes that GTM contributes to grammatical knowledge but fails to adequately develop communicative competence. Pedagogical implications and recommendations for integrating communicative practices into Libyan EFL classrooms are discussed.

Grammar Translation Method, communicative competence, EFL, Libyan secondary schools, applied linguistics.

1. Ahmed, R. (2016). The Impact of Grammar-Focused Instruction on Secondary School Students' Oral Proficiency in Egypt. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(4), 678–685. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alharbi, F. (2017). Grammar translation method and its effect on EFL learners’ speaking skills in Saudi secondary schools. Arab World English Journal, 8(3), 210–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Seghayer, K. (2014). Teaching English in Saudi Arabia: A study of communicative competence outcomes. English Language Teaching, 7(7), 30–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Altaieb, S. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions of English language teaching in Libya. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bataineh, R. (2019). Teacher-centered grammar instruction and communicative competence: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of English Language Education, 7(2), 56–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 41–57). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Demir, S., & Yavuz, A. (2015). The effect of grammar translation curricula on Turkish EFL learners’ speaking skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(12), 101–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hassan, M., & Ali, S. (2018). Anxiety and oral proficiency among Egyptian EFL learners: The role of traditional grammar instruction. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(2), 98–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hu, G. (2016). English language teaching in China: Grammar instruction versus communicative competence. Asian EFL Journal, 18(3), 45–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Penguin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ministry of Education. (2019). English language curriculum framework for secondary education. Tripoli: Libyan Ministry of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Orafi, S. M. S., & Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37(2), 243–253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Richards, J. C. (2017). Curriculum development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Savignon, S. J. (2002). Interpreting communicative language teaching: Contexts and concerns in teacher education. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Shihiba, S. T. (2011). An investigation of Libyan EFL teachers' conceptions of the communicative language teaching approach in relation to their implementation of an English language curriculum [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Huddersfield. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zarrough, H. (2015). The English language teaching situation in Libya: History, challenges, and future prospects. Al-Jabal Al-Gharbi University Journal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study