The Effectiveness of Asynchronous Mooc Learning for Vocabulary Acquisition Among Chinese Undergraduates

Asynchronous online learning has increasingly been recognized as a flexible and accessible approach for enhancing language proficiency among ESL and EFL learners. Although the overall impact of asynchronous learning on language acquisition has been extensively examined, investigations into its specific influence particularly on vocabulary development remain comparatively limited. This study examines the effectiveness of asynchronous online learning, via the Chinese University MOOC platform, in expanding English vocabulary among Chinese undergraduate students. Employing a mixed-methods design, 30 non-English majors completed a four-week online vocabulary course. Quantitative data were collected through pretests and posttests using the Productive Vocabulary Levels Test (PVLT) to assess knowledge of word form, meaning, and use. Semi-structured interviews investigated learners’ experiences, perceptions of the platform, and challenges encountered, providing qualitative insights to complement the quantitative analysis. Results indicated significant gains in learners’ productive vocabulary and the interview data revealed that students valued the platform’s flexibility and reported increased motivation and autonomy in learning, yet also cited limitations such as limited peer interaction and occasional technical issues. These results suggest that asynchronous MOOC-based instruction can effectively enhance English vocabulary size. Implications of this study highlight the potential of asynchronous platforms for vocabulary acquisition and highlight the need to address these limitations in course design.

Asynchronous Learning, Vocabulary Acquisition, MOOC platforms

1. Al-Jarf, R. (2007). Teaching vocabulary to EFL college students online. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 8(2), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alqallaf, A. W., & Ahmed, M. O. (2022). Vocabulary size and depth of knowledge: A study of Bahraini EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 12(1), 58-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aitchison, J. (2012). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ajabshir, Z. F. (2019). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on EFL learners' pragmatic competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 169-177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cahyani, N. M. W. S., Suwastini, N. K. A., Dantes, G. R., Jayantini, I. G. A. S. R., & Susanthi, I. G. A. A. D. (2021). Blended online learning: Combining the strengths of Synchronous and Asynchronous Online learning in EFL context. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 18(2), 174-184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cheng, H. F., & Dörnyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. International journal of innovation in language learning and teaching, 1(1), 153-174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Choo, W. L., & Ng, L. L. (2024). Effects of MOOC and video conferencing deliveries on vocabulary usage and learning strategies. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1562-1571. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Derakhshan, A., & Khatir, E. D. (2015). The effects of using games on English vocabulary learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(3), 39-47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. The United States: Oxford, 98, 37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ghazal, L. (2007). Learning vocabulary in EFL contexts through vocabulary learning strategies. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 1(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive psychology, 12(3), 306-355. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hamzah, M. S. G., Kafipour, R., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian undergraduate EFL students and its relation to their vocabulary size. European Journal of social sciences, 11(1), 39-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational research review, 12, 45-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern language journal, 70(2), 125-132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause quarterly, 31(4), 51-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Huckin, T. (1995). Vocabulary learning: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), 215-235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Karaaslan, H., Kılıc, N., Guven-yalcın, G., & Gullu, A. (2018). Students’ reflections on vocabulary learning through synchronous and asynchronous games and activities. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 53-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Khodaparast, F., & Ghafournia, N. (2015). The effect of asynchronous/synchronous approaches on English vocabulary achievement: A study of Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 8(4), 117-127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied linguistics, 22(1), 1-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2015). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied linguistics, 36(5), 611-634. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Liu, C., & Long, F. (2014, January). The discussion of traditional teaching and multimedia teaching approach in college English teaching. In 2014 International Conference on Management, Education and Social Science (ICMESS 2014) (pp. 31-33). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lotfi, A. R., & Pozveh, S. M. H. H. (2019). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous language learning: A study of Iranian EFL Intermediate students' vocabulary learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(12), 1585-1594. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. McBride-Chang, C., Tardif, T., Cho, J. R., Shu, H. U. A., Fletcher, P., Stokes, S. F., ... & Leung, K. (2008). What's in a word? Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in three languages. Applied psycholinguistics, 29(3), 437-462. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Meganathan, P., Thai, Y. N., Paramasivam, S., & Jalaluddin, I. (2019). Incidental and Intentional Learning of Vocabulary among Young ESL Learners. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 25(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Meganathan, P., Thai, Y. N., Paramasivam, S., & Jalaluddin, I. (2020). Reading preference and reactions towards different types of post-reading activities among Tamil primary school students. Journal of Language and Communication (JLC), 7(2), 701-720. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Meganathan, P. M., Satyanarayana, S. D., & Arumugam, N. (2024). Exploring vocabulary growth through songs: An in-depth interview of Malaysian undergraduate students. Journal of Language and Communication, 11(2), 165-178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nation, I. S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language (Vol. 10, pp. 126-132). Cambridge: Cambridge university press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nation, I. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?. Canadian modern language review, 63(1), 59-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Oxford, R., & Crookall, D. (1990). Vocabulary learning: A critical analysis of techniques. TESL Canada journal, 09-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ponniah, R. J. (2011). Incidental acquisition of vocabulary by reading. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 135-139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of virtual university of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Qi, G. Y. (2016). The importance of English in primary school education in China: perceptions of students. Multilingual Education, 6, 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Read, J., & Read, J. A. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge university press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Read, J., & Dang, T. N. Y. (2025). Measuring depth of academic vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 29(5), 1967-1993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Rigo, F., & Mikuš, J. (2021). Asynchronous and synchronous distance learning of English as a foreign language. Media Literacy and Academic Research, 4(1), 89-106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language teaching research, 12(3), 329-363. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language learning, 64(4), 913-951. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge university press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Shandra, N., & Chystiakova, I. (2021). Synchronous and asynchronous distance learning: benefits and limitations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139-152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sudarmaji, I., Forsia, L., Siregar, I. P. S., & Yusuf, D. (2022). Hello English App for Online Learning during the Pandemic: Does it Enhance the Students’ English Vocabulary Development?. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 4(1), 54-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Uchihara, T., & Clenton, J. (2020). Investigating the role of vocabulary size in second language speaking ability. Language teaching research, 24(4), 540-556. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Varkey, T. C., Varkey, J. A., Ding, J. B., Varkey, P. K., Zeitler, C., Nguyen, A. M., ... & Thomas, C. R. (2023). Asynchronous learning: a general review of best practices for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 16(1), 4-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Vidhiasi, D. M. (2021). Online learning in the era of pandemic: Solution or disaster. Saintara: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Maritim, 5(3), 111-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Webb, S. (2013). Depth of vocabulary knowledge. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 346-354. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied linguistics, 28(1), 46-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistic and situational aspects of language teaching. Edward Arnold. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Yang, W., & Dai, W. (2011). Rote Memorization of Vocabulary and Vocabulary Development. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 61-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Yip, F. W., & Kwan, A. C. (2006). Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning English vocabulary. Educational media international, 43(3), 233-249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Zarei, A. A., & Amani, M. A. (2018). The effect of online learning tools on L2 reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 37(3), 211-238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Zhang, R., & Tananuraksakul, N. (2023). A study of Chinese undergraduate students’ attitudes toward learning an online English course through MOOC at a private university in Beijing. Asia Social Issues, 16(2), 1-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study