The Efficacy of ChatGPT “Voice” Mode in AI-Assisted Language Learning: EFL Students’ Viewpoints

The increasing development of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has created new opportunities for enhancing English speaking practice among EFL learners. This study investigates students’ perceptions of the benefits and limitations of using ChatGPT “Voice” mode for English speaking practice among English-major sophomores at Saigon University. A qualitative research design was adopted with 15 second-year English-major students participating voluntarily in the study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews to explore learners’ experiences, attitudes, and viewpoints regarding the use of ChatGPT “Voice” mode as a virtual speaking partner outside the classroom. The findings revealed that ChatGPT “Voice” mode provided students with a convenient, low-anxiety, and flexible environment for English speaking practice, although several limitations related to feedback quality, technical issues, and over-reliance on AI were also identified. The study suggests that ChatGPT “Voice” mode should be integrated into speaking instruction with appropriate teacher guidance, prompt-training support, and continuous progress monitoring to maximize its educational effectiveness.

ChatGPT “Voice” Mode, Speaking skills, AI-assisted Language Learning, Semi-structured interviews, Learner Perceptions

1. Aliakbari, M., Barzan, P., & Sayyadi, M. (2025). Exploring the Impact of AI Chatbots on EFL Learners’ Conversational Proficiency. Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication, 1(2), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.30470/irelc.2025.2058800.1022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alzamil, L. M., Alhasani, A. M., & Alshehri, S. (2025). Privacy Concerns in ChatGPT Data Collection and Its Impact on Individuals. Future Internet, 17(11), 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17110511 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Balla, F. R. C., & Ramírez, E. A. V. (2025). Redefining speaking practice through ChatGPT’s voice conversation: Towards autonomous and personalized practice. Pacha Revista de Estudios Contemporáneos Del Sur Global, 6. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.46652/pacha.v6i18.430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bhar, S. K. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in EFL Speaking Instruction: A Systematic Review of Pedagogical Design, Affective Conditions and Instructional Input. Encyclopedia, 6(4), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6040074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Candrasari, R., Makulua, J., Noviasmy, Y., & Makulua, K. (2024). GPT Chat: Useful or Not in Supporting Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Language and Ubiquitous Learning, 2(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijlul.v2i2.963 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, Q. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of AI-Powered Feedback in English Writing: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025580 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Choi, W. (2025). The role of changes in pronunciation ability and anxiety through Gen-AI on EFL learners’ self-directed speaking motivation and social interaction confidence—A CHAT perspective. System, 133, 103788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103788 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rulinawaty-Kasmad/publication/342328830_THIRD_EDITION/links/5eed839ca6fdcc73be8d869e/THIRD-EDITION.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ding, D., & Yusof, A. M. B. (2025). Investigating the role of AI-powered conversation bots in enhancing L2 speaking skills and reducing speaking anxiety: A mixed methods study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05550-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fadillah, E. N., Saridah, S., Kamilasari, M., & Nur’aida, A. (2025). Enhancing Prior Knowledge Development in English Language Education through Chat GPT-Assisted Learning. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(1), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i1.13356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fitria, T. N. (2021). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN EDUCATION: USING AI TOOLS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call for Paper STIE AAS, 4(1), 134–147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fryer, L., & Carpenter, R. (2006). EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES Bots as Language Learning Tools. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jo, H. (2024). From concerns to benefits: A comprehensive study of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(35). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00471-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Le, Q. D., & Tran, L. H. (2020). Speaking Anxiety and Language Proficiency among EFL at A University in Vietnam. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 03(09), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v3-i9-01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M. S. (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11(50). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Malik, N., Kousar, A., & Arshad, K. (2025). Chat-GPT in Education: Learning Outcomes and Facilitating Knowledge Acquisition. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v4i2.131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Memon, M., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., & Cheah, J.-H. (2025). CONVENIENCE SAMPLING: A REVIEW AND GUIDELINES FOR QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(2)01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Munaye, Y. Y., Admass, W., Belayneh, Y., Molla, A., & Asmare, M. (2025). ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review on Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions. MDPI Open Access Journals. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/a18060352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nguyen, L. A. D., Dang, V. M. T., & Le, M. T. (2025). An Investigation into Students’ Perception of Using Call Annie as a Virtual Conversational Partner. Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference, 6. https://asiacall.info/proceedings/index.php/articles/article/view/129/94 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nguyen, T. M. N., & Pham, T. T. N. (2024). Voice Mode of ChatGPT: a New Support Tool for Teaching English in University Programs. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD), 9(7). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nugroho, A., Putro, N. H. P. S., & Syamsi, K. (2023). The Potentials of ChatGPT for Language Learning: Unpacking its Benefits and Limitations. REGISTER JOURNAL, 16(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i2.224-247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Obilor, E. (2023). Convenience and Purposive Sampling Techniques: Are they the Same? International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, 11(1), 1–7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. OpenAI. (2025, September 13). https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8400625-voice-mode-faq [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Pangestu, H. P., & Suwartono, T. (2024). Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Support in Assisting Students’ English-Speaking Skills. Educalitra: English Education, Linguistics, and Literature Journal, 3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13134979 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Pham, T. T. N. (2024). Investigating the effectiveness of practicing English conversation with ChatGPT in improving non-English majored students’ English speaking skills at Nguyen Tat Thanh University. Journal of Science and Technology - Nguyen Tat Thanh University, 7(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55401/b1rnww21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Pratiwi, N., Efendy, A. G., Rini, H. C., & Ahmed, N. A. (2024). Speaking Practice using ChatGPT’s Voice Conversation: A Review on Potentials and Concerns. Journal of Language Intelligence and Culture, 6(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.35719/jlic.v6i1.149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Revolusi, P., & Febriandy, R. (2025). HUMAN-AI EDUCATIONAL COLLABORATION: FACING LEARNING CHALLENGES IN THE DIGITAL AGE. International Journal of Management Entrepreneurship Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(2), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v8i2.3229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Sarib, M., & Alhabsyi, F. (2022). Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies Ruslin. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 12(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Sahoo, R. (2022). Interview as a Tool for Data Collection in Educational Research. In Tools of Data Collection in Educational Research. Lucky International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Tamayo, J., Sotto, J. C., Vicente, C., & Lim, M. (2025). The Impact of AI Tools on Student Engagement and Academic Performance. GEO Academic Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.56738/issn29603986.geo2025.6.94 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Traga Philippakos, Z. A., & Rocconi, L. (2025). AI Literacy: Elementary and Secondary Teachers’ Use of AI-Tools, Reported Confidence, and Professional Development Needs. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zou, B., Du, Y., Wang, Z., & Chen, J. (2023). An Investigation Into Artificial Intelligence Speech Evaluation Programs With Automatic Feedback for Developing EFL Learners’ Speaking Skills. SAGE Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231193818 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study