The Emergence Motivational Themes of AI Companion Use among Malaysian Youth: A Cyber-Ethnographic Study
Authors
Faculty of Business & Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) (Kangar Perlis Malaysia)
Faculty of Business & Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) (Kangar Perlis Malaysia)
Faculty of Business & Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) (Kangar Perlis Malaysia)
Faculty of Business & Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) (Kangar Perlis Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100701206
Subject Category: Computer Science
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 17567-17575
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-07
Accepted: 2026-08-12
Published: 2026-08-24
Abstract
The proliferation of artificial intelligence companion applications has introduced a new form of digital relationship among youth, yet the specific motivations that draw users toward sustained engagement with these systems remain underexplored outside Western contexts. This study examines the motivational architecture behind AI companion use among Malaysian youth through a cyber-ethnographic approach grounded in Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT). Data were gathered through researcher reflexivity, the collection of digital artefacts, and semi-structured online interviews with five purposively sampled informants aged 25 to 28 who actively engage with the Replika application. Thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase procedure and facilitated by NVivo 10, identified five interlocking motivational themes: limitation of human connection, personal characteristics, initial triggers, qualities that motivate continued use, and emotional needs and expectations. Findings indicate that motivation is not a single discrete gratification but a layered system in which structural limitations of human connection in the Malaysian collectivist context condition how personal predispositions, triggering events, application qualities, and emotional needs interact. The study extends UGT by identifying a previously undocumented fandom-mediated pathway into AI companion use and by demonstrating that engagement is driven by anticipatory emotional regulation as much as by reactive distress. Implications for digital well-being programming and culturally responsive AI design are discussed.
Keywords
Uses and Gratifications Theory; AI companion; cyber-ethnography; digital intimacy; Malaysian youth; Replika
Downloads
References
1. Abd Hadi, N. H., Midin, M., Tong, S. F., Chan, L. F., Mohd Salleh Sahimi, H., Ahmad Badayai, A. R., & Adilun, N. (2023). Exploring Malaysian parents' and teachers' cultural conceptualization of adolescent social and emotional competencies: A qualitative formative study. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 992863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.992863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chaturvedi, R., Verma, S., Das, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Social companionship with artificial intelligence: Recent trends and future avenues. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, Article 122634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122634 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. De Freitas, J., Oğuz-Uğuralp, Z., Uğuralp, A. K., & Puntoni, S. (2026). AI companions reduce loneliness. Journal of Consumer Research, 52(6), 1126–1148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Laestadius, L., Bishop, A., Gonzalez, M., Illenčík, D., & Campos-Castillo, C. (2024). Too human and not human enough: A grounded theory analysis of mental health harms from emotional dependence on the social chatbot Replika. New Media & Society, 26(10), 5923–5941. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221142007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Lai, L., Pan, Y., Xu, R., & Jiang, Y. (2025). Depression and the use of conversational AI for companionship among college students: The mediating role of loneliness and the moderating effects of gender and mind perception. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, Article 1580826. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1580826 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Langford, C. P. H., Bowsher, J., Maloney, J. P., & Lillis, P. P. (1997). Social support: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025095.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Lin, Z., & Ng, Y. (2024). Unraveling gratifications, concerns, and acceptance of generative artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2436749 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Mugilarasan, A. L. V. (2026). Exploring AI companion phenomenon among youth in Malaysia: A cyber ethnography approach [Unpublished bachelor's dissertation]. Universiti Malaysia Perlis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Niu, W., Zhang, W., Zhang, C., & Chen, X. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence autonomy in higher education: A uses and gratification perspective. Sustainability, 16(3), Article 1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031276 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Pentina, I., Hancock, T., & Xie, T. (2022). Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of Replika. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, Article 107600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., & Brandtzæg, P. B. (2023). A longitudinal study of self-disclosure in human–chatbot relationships. Interacting with Computers, 35(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwad022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
- Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
- Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
- Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
- Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet