The Eu’s Inland Waterways: Sustainable Efficiency Improvement Strategy

The aim of this study is to investigate the potential of Europe's inland waterways as a sustainable transport solution, focusing on the modernization of infrastructure, regulatory frameworks, and operational practices to enhance efficiency, resilience, and sustainability in the face of climate change. The research addresses several key questions: What are the current challenges facing inland waterway transport in Europe, particularly in relation to climate change? How can infrastructure modernization improve the navigability and operational efficiency of inland waterways? What role does regulatory harmonization play in facilitating cross-border cooperation among stakeholders in inland waterway transport? How can digital technologies be integrated into inland waterway operations to enhance sustainability and resilience? Finally, what best practices and innovative technologies can be adopted to support the transition to greener inland waterway transport? The study identifies significant infrastructure bottlenecks and maintenance issues that hinder the efficiency of inland waterways, exacerbated by climate-induced hydrological variability. Fragmented governance structures and inconsistent regulations across member states create barriers to effective cross-border operations and stakeholder collaboration. The integration of digital technologies, such as real-time traffic management systems and predictive analytics, is crucial for optimizing operational efficiency and reducing delays. Transitioning to low-emission vessel technologies and implementing climate-resilient infrastructure can significantly reduce the environmental impact of inland waterway transport. Enhanced participation from various stakeholders, including environmental organizations and local communities, is essential for developing adaptive governance frameworks that balance economic and ecological priorities. The research concludes that Europe's inland waterways hold significant potential as a sustainable transport solution, provided that comprehensive modernization efforts are undertaken. By addressing infrastructure deficiencies, harmonizing regulations, and leveraging digital technologies, inland waterways can enhance their operational efficiency and resilience against climate change. The study emphasizes the importance of collaborative governance and stakeholder engagement in achieving these goals, ultimately positioning inland waterways as a viable alternative to traditional road and rail transport systems in the European Union's decarbonization and sustainable mobility agenda. This research contributes to the broader understanding of how inland waterways can be revitalized to meet the growing demands for sustainable transport while addressing pressing environmental concerns.

Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM), Adaptive Management

1. Altermatt, F., &Baldan et al. Reviving Europe’s rivers: Seven challenges in the implementation of the Nature Restoration Law to restore free flowing rivers. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 11(3), e1717. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1717 (WUR Research) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baranyai, Z. (2020). Transboundary river basins in the European Union and the impacts of the Anthropocene. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barceló, D., & Petrovic, M. (Eds.). (2011). The Ebro River Basin. In Handbook of Environmental Chemistry (Vol. 13). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-18032-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brouwer, R., & Hofkes, M. (Eds.). (2008). Integrated water resource management: Concepts and cases. Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. CIREF (Centre de Investigación / NGO review). (2021, December 30). Evaluación del plan de cuenca del Ebro: Evaluating river restoration measures in draft River Basin Management Plans in Spain. https://europe.wetlands.org/publication/evaluating-river-restoration-measures-in-draft-river-basin-management-plans-in-spain/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state: Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Conca, K., & Weinthal, E. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of water politics and policy. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Council of the European Union. (2022, December 5). Council conclusions on the ongoing development of inland waterway transport (NAIADES III). https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/12/05/council-conclusions-on-the-ongoing-development-of-inland-waterway-transport-naiades-iii/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Council of the European Union. (2025, June 26). Co-legislators agree on upgrading river information services. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/06/26/co-legislators-agree-on-modernising-river-information-services/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. De Wit, R. (2016). Multimodal transport: Carrier liability and documentation. Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers. https://www.ics.org.uk/media/294412/ics%20reading%20list%202016%20web.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Domenighini, A. (2024). Governance challenges of autonomous inland navigation: Liability and legal adaptation. SpringerLink. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Drahos, P., & Braithwaite, J. (2002). Information feudalism: Who owns the knowledge economy? Earthscan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. ECMT / OECD. (2006). Inland waterways and environmental protection. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2006/08/inland-waterways-and-environmental-protection_g1gh7230/9789282113479-en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. European Commission. (2014). Directive 2014/89/EU establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. Official Journal of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. European Commission. (2020). The EU blue economy report. Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. European Commission. (2021). Territorial agenda 2030: Towards an inclusive, smart, and sustainable Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. European Commission. (2024, January 29). Commission proposes to modernise river information services in EU. https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/commission-proposes-modernise-river-information-services-eu-2024-01-29_en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. European Commission. (2025). NAIADES Action Programme and EU inland waterway policy. European Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. European Commission. (n.d.-a). Inland waterways: Promotion of inland waterway transport. https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-modes/inland-waterways/promotion-inland-waterway-transport_en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. European Commission. (n.d.-b). NAIADES III action plan. https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/inland-waterways/promotion-inland-waterway-transport/naiades-iii-action-plan_en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. European Commission. (n.d.-c). Sustainable and smart mobility strategy. https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/mobility-strategy_en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. European Commission, Directorate General for Environment; COWI; Milieu. (2017). Environmental impact assessment of projects — Guidance on the preparation of the environmental impact assessment report (Directive 2011/92/EU as amended by 2014/52/EU). Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4d59e72a-cb4c-11e7-a5d5-01aa75ed71a1/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. European Commission. (n.d.-d). Transport and tourism. https://commission.europa.eu/topics/transport-and-tourism_en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. European Commission. (n.d.-e). European inland waterways of Europe and their digitalisation. https://transport.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2017-12/2017-10-dina.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. European Environment Agency. (2019). The European environment — State and outlook 2020: Knowledge for transition to a sustainable Europe (SOER 2020). Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. European Environment Agency. (2020). Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2020: An indicator-based report. Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. European Environment Agency. (2022). Marine messages II: Navigating the future of Europe’s seas. Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. European Parliament. (2022). Inland waterway transport in the EU: Policy, performance, and environmental impacts. European Parliament. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. European Parliament. (2025). Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2005/44/EC on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterways in the Community (A10 0033/2025). European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2025-0033_EN.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. European Parliament Research Service [Europarl]. (2022). EU transport policy: Inland waterways and modal shift objectives. European Parliament Research Service. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Grimaldi, M. (2023). Inland Waterway Transport: The European Legal Framework. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Grafton, R. Q., Libecap, G. D., McGlennon, S., Landry, C., & O’Brien, B. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of water resources economics. Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Hernández, J. E., et al. (Eds.). (2020). Collaborative logistics and intermodality: Integration in supply chain network models and solutions for global environments. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-50958-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. ICPDR – International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River. (2021). Danube River Basin Management Plan 2021. https://www.icpdr.org/tasks-topics/tasks/river-basin-management/danube-river-basin-management-plan-2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kaika, M. (2005). City of flows: Modernity, nature, and the city. Routledge [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Konings, J. W., Priemus, H., & Nijkamp, P. (Eds.). (2017). The future of intermodal freight transport: Operations, design and policy. Springer. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL27040470M/The_future_of_intermodal_freight_transport [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Lindegarth, M., Carstensen, J., Drakare, S., Johnson, R. K., Nyström Sandman, A., Söderpalm, A., & Wikström, S. A. (Eds.). (2016). Ecological Assessment of Swedish Water Bodies; development, harmonisation and integration of biological indicators. Final report of the research programme WATERS (WATERS report no. 2016:10). Havsmiljöinstitutet. https://www.gu.se/sites/default/files/2020-05/WATERS_Ecological%20 assessment%20 of%20 Swedish %20water%20bodies.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mekong River Commission (MRC). (2021). Integrated water resources management in the Mekong Basin. MRC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Momblanch, A., & others. (2019). Tradeoffs between water uses and environmental flows: A hydroeconomic analysis in the Ebro Basin. Water Resources Management. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11269-019-02254-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Monios, J., & Bergqvist, R. (2019). Intermodal freight transport and logistics. Routledge. https://www.bokus.com/bok/9781498785129/intermodal-freight-transport-and-logistics/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Mostert, E. (2003). Conflict and cooperation in international freshwater management: A global review. UNESCO-IHE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Nile Basin Initiative (NBI). (2020). Transboundary water management in the Nile Basin. NBI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2), 211–240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Plovput; Witteveen+Bos; European Union. (n.d.). EIA Study – Main Text: Preparation of documentation for river training and dredging works on selected locations along the Danube River. https://www.plovput.rs/file/EIA-study/eng/EIA_Study-Main-Text.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Plovput. (n.d.). River training and dredging works on critical sectors on the Danube River in Serbia: Project data sheet and environmental monitoring documents. https://navigation.danube-region.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2019/11/PA1A129_River_Training_and_Dredging_in_Serbia1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Posner, R. A. (1973). Economic analysis of law. Little, Brown. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Reis, V., & Macário, R. (2018). Intermodal freight transportation. Elsevier. https://shop.elsevier.com/books/intermodal-freight-transportation/reis/978-0-12-814464-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Renberg, I., Bindler, R., Bradshaw, E., Emteryd, O., & McGowan, S. (2001). Sediment evidence of early eutrophication and heavy-metal pollution of Lake Mälaren, central Sweden. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 30(8), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-30.8.496 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. RheinBlick2050. (n.d.). Climate-change impact assessment on the Rhine River basin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RheinBlick2050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Schramm, H.-J. (2016). Freight forwarder’s intermediary role in multimodal transport chains. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-7908-2775-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. ScienceDirect. (2011). Sustainable policy approaches for European inland waterways: Case studies on the Danube. ScienceDirect. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. ScienceDirect. (2025). Climate vulnerability and resilience in European inland navigation: Rhine, Main, and Danube case studies. ScienceDirect. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. TRIMIS. (2025). European inland waterway corridors: Connectivity, logistics, and infrastructure analysis. Transport Research and Innovation Monitoring and Information System. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2022). Adaptive management of the Mississippi River Basin. USACE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Vogel, D. (1986). National styles of regulation: Environmental policy in Great Britain and the United States. Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Willén, E. (2001). Four decades of research on the Swedish large lakes — experiences from monitoring lake Mälaren. AMBIO. https://info1.ma.slu.se/ima/publikationer/AMBIO/pdf/AMBIO_intro.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Wikipedia. (2019). European Code for Navigation on Inland Waterways (CEVNI). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Code_for_Navigation_on_Inland_Waterways [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Wikipedia. (2025). CEMT classification of inland waterways. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CEMT_classification [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar