The Genealogies of Jesus: Matthew, Luke, Jewish Tradition, and the Apocryphal Gospels
Authors
Physics, Independent Research (Canada)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800818
Subject Category: Theology
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 12061-12076
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-26
Accepted: 2026-09-03
Published: 2026-09-18
Abstract
The genealogies of Jesus in Matthew 1:1–17 and Luke 3:23–38 present one of the most persistent interpretive problems in the New Testament. Both genealogies seek to establish Jesus within the biblical history of Israel, yet they differ substantially in names, sequence, structure, and apparent relationships. Matthew traces Jesus from Abraham through David and Solomon to Joseph, while Luke traces Jesus backward from Joseph through a different branch of David's family and ultimately to Adam. The problem becomes more complex because both Matthew and Luke present Jesus' conception as occurring through the Holy Spirit rather than through ordinary biological fatherhood by Joseph.
This paper examines these discrepancies in the context of Old Testament genealogy, Jewish concepts of lineage, inheritance, legal sonship, Davidic kingship, levirate marriage, and messianic expectation. It also considers the contribution of the apocryphal gospels, particularly the Protoevangelium of James, to later Christian understanding of Mary and Joseph. The paper argues that the genealogies should not automatically be interpreted as modern biological family trees. Ancient Jewish genealogies could communicate ancestry, tribal identity, inheritance, legal status, dynastic legitimacy, and theological purpose. Matthew appears particularly concerned with Jesus as the Davidic Messiah and legitimate heir to the royal promises, while Luke places Jesus within the broader history of humanity, extending the genealogy to Adam and God. The differences remain historically significant and cannot be completely harmonized from the surviving evidence, but they need not be regarded as fatal contradictions to the Christian theological claim. Their ultimate purpose is to establish Jesus within the biblical story of Abraham and David while the wider New Testament makes the much greater claim that the Davidic Messiah is also the Son of God.
Keywords
Genealogies, substantially, Testament.
Downloads
References
1. The Holy Bible. Matthew 1:1–17. Genealogy of Jesus from Abraham through David and Solomon to Joseph. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. The Holy Bible. Luke 3:23–38. Genealogy of Jesus from Joseph backward through David, Abraham, and Adam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. The Holy Bible. 2 Samuel 7:12–16. The Davidic covenant and promise of an enduring royal dynasty. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. The Holy Bible. 1 Chronicles 17:11–14. Parallel account of God's covenant with David. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. The Holy Bible. Genesis 49:8–12. Judah's royal blessing and its importance for later messianic interpretation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. The Holy Bible. Psalm 2:1–12. The Lord's anointed king and the Davidic royal tradition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. The Holy Bible. Psalm 89:3–4, 19–37. God's covenant with David and the promise of an enduring dynasty. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. The Holy Bible. Psalm 132:11–12. The promise of a descendant of David upon the throne. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. The Holy Bible. Isaiah 9:6–7. The promised ruler and the throne of David. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. The Holy Bible. Isaiah 11:1–10. The “shoot” from Jesse and the restoration of Davidic kingship. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. The Holy Bible. Jeremiah 23:5–6. The righteous Branch of David. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. The Holy Bible. Jeremiah 33:14–17. The continuation of the Davidic line and royal promise. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. The Holy Bible. Micah 5:2–5. Bethlehem and the ruler associated with David's origins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. The Holy Bible. Romans 1:3–4. Jesus as descended from David according to the flesh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. The Holy Bible. Acts 13:22–23. Jesus presented as the promised descendant of David. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. The Holy Bible. 2 Timothy 2:8. Jesus Christ as descended from David. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. The Holy Bible. Revelation 5:5. Jesus as the “Lion of the tribe of Judah” and “Root of David.” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. The Holy Bible. Revelation 22:16. Jesus as the “root and descendant of David.” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Jewish and Second-Temple Background [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Josephus, Flavius. The Antiquities of the Jews. Especially Books 7–8, concerning David, Solomon, and the Davidic monarchy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Charlesworth, James H., ed. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. 2 vols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1983–1985. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Collins, John J. The Scepter and the Star: The Messiahs of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Other Ancient Literature. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Vermes, Geza. The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English. London: Penguin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Early Christian and Apocryphal Sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. The Protoevangelium of James. Especially chapters 1–25, concerning Mary, her parents, Joseph, and the circumstances surrounding Jesus' birth. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. The Infancy Gospel of Thomas. Early traditions concerning the childhood of Jesus. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. The Gospel of Thomas. Sayings attributed to Jesus; useful for comparison with canonical traditions, although it does not provide a genealogy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Eusebius of Caesarea. Ecclesiastical History. Book 1, especially the discussion of the genealogies of Matthew and Luke. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Irenaeus of Lyons. Against Heresies. Especially Book 3, concerning Jesus, incarnation, Davidic descent, and the Gospel traditions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Modern Scholarly Studies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke. Updated ed. New York: Doubleday, 1993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Davies, W. D., and Dale C. Allison Jr. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Vol. 1. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1988. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke I–IX. Anchor Bible 28. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1981. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Green, Joel B. The Gospel of Luke. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Nolland, John. The Gospel of Matthew. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Nolland, John. Luke 1:1–9:20. Word Biblical Commentary 35A. Dallas: Word Books, 1989. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. France, R. T. The Gospel of Matthew. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Bauckham, Richard. Jude and the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1990. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Brown, Raymond E. The Community of the Beloved Disciple. New York: Paulist Press, 1979. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Premarital Counselling and Family Stability among Christians in Bweranyangi Deanery West Ankole Diocese Uganda
- Assessing the Effectiveness of the Church of Uganda in Fighting Drug Abuse and Crime Rate in Uganda
- Evangelism And Spiritual Commitment of Christians a case of Diocese of West Ankole, Bushenyi District. Uganda.
- The Contribution of Information and Communication Technology in Enhancing Worship Services a case of Ryakasinga Archdeaconry, West Ankole Diocese Bushenyi District Uganda
- Homologous Structures: A Reappraisal of Evolutionary Interpretation