The Impact of Congestion on Rehabilitation in Akure Correctional Centre of Ondo State
Authors
Public Administration Department, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo, Ondo State (Nigeria)
Public Administration Department, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo, Ondo State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600488
Subject Category: Criminal Justice
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 7039-7046
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-05
Accepted: 2026-06-10
Published: 2026-06-27
Abstract
The institutionalisation of justice administration system all over the world is meant to bring orderliness into the conduct of human affairs. This is because some individuals by their nature will disrupt social order and create discomfort so that chaotic situations can arise. If governments fold its arms and allow people to take laws into their hands, it will amount to roles abdication. It is in a bid to arrest unpleasant occurrences that gave birth to the establishment of correctional centre for rehabilitation and reformatory purposes. The whole essence of this is to serve as deterrent to members of the society with such attitudes. However, the modalities for the implementation of correctional programmes vary from one country to the other. This has thus prompted unintented outcomes. Inmate congestion is one of the most pressing challenges confronting Nigeria's correctional system. This study investigated its impact on rehabilitation in Akure's correctional centre, where 50 questionnaires were administered, and 42 were successful returned and analysed. Using a quantitative approach, descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation) were employed with the aid of SPSS 25.0. Results revealed that 93.1% of respondents agreed that congestion contributes to jail breaks, while 97% linked it to poor health outcomes such as infections and epidemics. Similarly, 79.4% noted that overpopulation delays justice and violates the right of inmates, while 65.7% observed that it exposes minor offenders to hardened criminals. In contrast, only 43% associated congestion with homosexuality and lesbianism, indicating mixed views. Importantly, 98% agreed that non- custodial programmes significantly promote rehabilitation. The study concludes that congestion undermines rehabilitation and recommends expanded non- custodial sentencing, accelerated trial processes, improved health facilities, and stricter inmate management practices. It relies on an admixture of primary as well as secondary data
Keywords
Congestion, Rehabilitation, Correctional Centres, Non- Custodial Sentencing, Human Rights
Downloads
References
1. Adebayo, T., & Ojo, F. (2021). Prison congestion and institutional security in Nigeria: Implications for correctional reforms. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies, 14(2), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adebisi, A., & Omotayo, K. (2021). Rehabilitation and reintegration of inmates: Human capital perspectives in Nigeria’s correctional centres. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Review, 11(3), 102–114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adeyemi, S. (2018). Sexual misconduct and custodial congestion: Evidence from Nigerian prisons. Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 46(1), 27–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Adeyemi, T. (2020). Holistic rehabilitation in correctional institutions: A Nigerian perspective. Journal of Correctional Education, 71(1), 44–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ajayi, P. (2025). Influence of rehabilitation programmes on recidivists in correctional centres in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Correctional Studies and Practice, 19(1), 88–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Akinwale, J. (2022). Prison congestion and the crisis of criminal justice delivery in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Criminology, 8(2), 14–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Alemika, E. (2019). Schools of crime? A critical analysis of correctional congestion in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 17(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Aon, T., Lee, J., & Martinez, P. (2025). The association between health and prison overcrowding: A systematic review. Journal of Public Health Policy, 46(2), 155–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Awopetu, F. (2014). An assessment of prison overcrowding in Nigeria: Implications for rehabilitation, reformation and reintegration of inmates. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies, 8(1), 23–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bukie, S., Emenike, I., & Olayinka, O. (2024). Correctional institutions congestion and the health implication of inmates in Nigeria. International Journal of Health and Correctional Research, 5(2), 77–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Evans, G. (2019). Human responses to prison crowding: Revisiting environmental stress theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Evans, G., & Wener, R. (2007). Crowding and personal control: Social interaction and stress in correctional institutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(5), 1269–1297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Fazel, S., Baillargeon, J., & O’Donnell, I. (2017). Health outcomes of prison overcrowding: A global perspective. The Lancet Public Health, 2(7), e325–e326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Joseph, M. (2021). Prison overcrowding trend in Nigeria and policy implications. International Journal of Criminal Justice Policy, 7(2), 58–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Nguyen, L. (2021). Revisiting environmental stress theory: Critiques and extensions in correctional settings. Journal of Theoretical Criminology, 25(4), 477–492. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ogunwale, T., & Adebayo, A. (2021). Correctional reforms in Nigeria: A review of the Nigerian Correctional Service Act 2019. Journal of Law and Social Policy, 12(1), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Olarinmoye, O. (2022). Rehabilitation and reformation in Nigerian prisons: Challenges and prospects. Journal of African Criminology, 10(2), 90–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Oloyede, K. (2020). Community-based sanctions and rehabilitation: Evidence from Nigerian correctional reforms. Journal of Criminal Justice Research, 9(3), 144–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Stokols, D. (1972). On the distinction between density and crowding: Some implications for future research. Psychological Review, 79(3), 275–277. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Valera, P., & Kaur, S. (2020). Environmental stressors in correctional settings: Impact on inmates and staff. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 26(2), 157–165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Walmsley, R. (2023). World prison population list (14th ed.). Institute for Crime & Justice Policy Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Crime Pattern in The Province of LA Union: A Study on Index and Non-Index Crimes
- Theorizing Participation within the Juvenile Delinquency Discourse: A Critical Systemic Analysis on Children in Conflict With the Law in Davao City
- Voices Beneath the Policy: Village Reflections on Smart Policing Strategies of the Philippine National Police (Pnp)
- Policing The Future: Community Stories on the Philippine National Police (PNP) Smart Policing Shift
- Confronting the Country’s Fault Lines: Insights of Legal Advocates on Social Issues and Discontentment