The Impact of Monetary Policy on Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis (1990–2023)
Authors
MPhil/PhD, Lead City University, Ibadan (Lead City Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800398
Subject Category: Banking and Finance
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 6156-6169
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-24
Accepted: 2026-08-29
Published: 2026-09-07
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between monetary policy variables and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows in Nigeria over 1990–2023 (34 annual observations). Unit-root tests (including the Zivot-Andrews test, which allows for an unknown structural break) confirm that FDI, the exchange rate, money supply, and GDP are non-stationary in log levels, while the interest rate is stationary. A standard ARDL bounds test, which assumes one fixed long-run relationship across the entire sample, finds no statistical evidence of cointegration (F-statistics of 1.2–3.0 across specifications, below the relevant lower bounds). However, a Gregory-Hansen regime-shift cointegration test — which allows the long-run relationship itself to shift once at an unknown date — finds strong evidence of cointegration once a break in 2013 is permitted (ADF* = -5.71, significant at the 5% level against Gregory and Hansen's, 1996, critical values). The long-run elasticity of FDI with respect to the exchange rate is approximately -1.0 before 2013 and approximately -3.3 after; the elasticity with respect to money supply rises correspondingly from approximately 1.0 to 2.8. This is consistent with Nigeria's post-2013 experience of oil-price collapse, recession, and repeated currency devaluations, which appear to have shifted rather than simply disrupted the long-run relationship between monetary conditions and FDI. A well-diagnosed short-run model separately confirms that a 1% naira depreciation is associated with an approximate 1.15% reduction in FDI in the same year (p = 0.002), and a 1% increase in money supply with an approximate 2.09% increase (p = 0.009); a Toda-Yamamoto Granger causality test, however, finds no significant lagged predictive causality from either variable to FDI, indicating that the relationship is better described as a strong contemporaneous association than as an established causal lag structure. Together these results support treating exchange-rate stability and monetary-liquidity management as significant, but regime-dependent, correlates of Nigeria's FDI performance, and argue for caution before asserting a single, time-invariant causal mechanism.
Keywords
Foreign Direct Investment, Monetary Policy, Exchange Rate, ARDL Model, Nigeria JEL Classification: E52, F21, F31, O55
Downloads
References
1. Adegboye, A. C., Aluko, O. A., & Onabote, A. A. (2023). Macroeconomic instability and foreign direct investment in Nigeria: A fresh insight. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 39(4), 987–1005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aizenman, J., Jinjarak, Y., & Park, D. (2020). Monetary policy and foreign direct investment: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 105, 102138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Asiedu, E. (2006). Foreign direct investment in Africa: The role of natural resources, market size, government policy, institutions and political instability. The World Economy, 29(1), 63–77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ayanwale, A. B. (2007). FDI and economic growth: Evidence from Nigeria (AERC Research Paper No. 165). African Economic Research Consortium. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Buch, C. M., Döpke, J., & Strotmann, H. (2009). Does exchange rate uncertainty hamper foreign direct investment? A Bayesian model averaging approach. Review of International Economics, 17(2), 240–252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2020). Multinational enterprises and the global economy (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Eniekezimene, A. F., Wodu, E., & Anda-Owei, J. P. (2024). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Nigeria: A revisit. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 26(2), 37–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ezeoha, A. E., & Ogamba, E. (2010). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Nigeria: An empirical investigation. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Gregory, A. W., & Hansen, B. E. (1996). Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 99–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hassan, S. U. (2016). Exchange rate volatility and economic growth in Nigeria: A vector autoregression analysis. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(6), 127–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kripfganz, S., & Sam, D. C. (2020). Response surface regressions for critical value bounds and approximate p-values in equilibrium correction models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(6), 1456–1481. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Macroeconomics (10th ed.). Worth Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Njoku, C. O., Ugwu, K. E., Nwaimo, C. E., Nwadike, E. C., Eke, C. K., Ikeogu, C. C., Omeire, E. U., Otuonye, A. I., Echeme, I. I., & Eriwa, B. O. (2025). Exchange rate volatility: Effect on foreign direct investment inflows in Nigeria. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(5), 573–582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ogbonna, U. G. (2018). Impact of exchange rate on foreign direct investment in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 8(3), 179–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Taylor, A. M. (2019). International economics and globalization. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1–2), 225–250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023). World investment report 2023: Investing in sustainable recovery. United Nations Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. World Bank. Gross Domestic Product for Nigeria [MKTGDPNGA646NWDB], current U.S. dollars, retrieved via FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Study on Customer Awareness on Green Banking Intiatives
- International Financial Reporting Standards and Earnings Management: A Global Research Landscape Analysis
- Analysis of Financial Performance and Operational Efficiency of State Bank of India Using the CAMEL Framework
- Roles and Performance of India Post Payment Bank (IPPB) With Special References to Shivamogga District
- Enhancing Transactional Security in U.S. Banking Systems by Implementing OTP-Based Two-Factor Authentication to Mitigate Debit and Credit Card Fraud