The Impact of Physical Education (PE) As a Minor Subject on the Social Wellness of College Students in Selected Heis in Butuan City

Authors

Maricris C. Abamonga, EdD

Philippine Science High School- Caraga Region Campus (Philippines)

Louren P. Fulay, MSPE, MAED-EM

Philippine Science High School- Caraga Region Campus (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601272

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 18551-18557

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-01

Accepted: 2026-07-06

Published: 2026-07-16

Abstract

This study examined the impact of Physical Education (PE) as a minor subject on the social wellness of college students in Butuan City. Specifically, it determined how participation in PE influences students' social wellness in terms of interpersonal relationships, communication skills, teamwork, cooperation, respect for others, social connectedness, and overall social well-being. The study was conducted within the context of the Commission on Higher Education's (CHED) proposed revisions to the General Education (GE) curriculum, which include possible changes to the structure and number of GE courses. However, since these revisions were still under consultation and had not been fully implemented during the conduct of the study, Physical Education remained a required component of the curriculum in many Higher Education Institutions (HEIs).

Keywords

Impact, Physical Education, Minor Subject, Social Wellness, College Students

Downloads

References

1. Bailey, R. (2006). Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of School Health, 76(8), 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00132.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cáceres, R. (2015). Physical education in higher education: A curriculum perspective. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, A., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2006). Physical education curriculum and social outcomes in higher education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25(4), 377–396. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gnambs, T., & Staufenbiel, T. (2016). A Monte Carlo simulation study of the robustness of ANOVA and regression to violations of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology, 12(4), 139–148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ha, A. S., Pang, B., & Fu, Y. (2012). Transition of physical activity patterns of students from childhood to adolescence – A longitudinal study. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness, 10(1), 31–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Holt, N. L., Neely, K. C., Slater, L. G., Camiré, M., Côté, J., Fraser-Thomas, J., MacDonald, D., Strachan, L., & Tamminen, K. A. (2017). A grounded theory of positive youth development through sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2016.1180704 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Payne, P. G., & Mermelstein, J. (2008). Physical activity, sport, and wellbeing: Understanding the emotional and social benefits. Sport, Education and Society, 13(2), 101–111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Stewart-Brown, S., & Janmohamed, K. (2008). Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): User guide. National Health Service Health Scotland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. UNESCO. (2015). Quality physical education (QPE): Guidelines for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wang, J., & Sugiyama, T. (2014). Relationship between students’ involvement in school-based physical activity programs and social skills development: A comparative study. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 14(1), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. World Health Organization. (2020). WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles