The Impact of Supply Chain Agility on Sustainable Supply Chain Performance: The Moderating Role of Supply Chain Innovation and The Mediating Role of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices in Sri Lankan Manufacturing Companies

This study examines the impact of supply chain agility on sustainable supply chain performance, with sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) practices as a mediating mechanism and supply chain innovation as a moderating factor within the context of Sri Lankan manufacturing firms. Drawing on Dynamic Capabilities Theory, the Resource-Based View, and the Triple Bottom Line framework, the study develops and tests a conceptual model through a quantitative, cross-sectional survey. Data were collected from 78 people involved in supply chain operations across export-oriented manufacturing industries, and the hypotheses were tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results reveal that supply chain agility has a significant positive effect on SSCM practices, while its direct effect on sustainable supply chain performance is not significant. SSCM practices, however, have a significant positive impact on performance and fully mediate the relationship between agility and performance, indicating that agility contributes to sustainability outcomes only when translated into operational practices. In contrast, the moderating effect of supply chain innovation is not supported. The model demonstrates acceptable explanatory power and predictive relevance. The study contributes to the literature by providing evidence of full mediation and highlighting the importance of operationalizing dynamic capabilities through sustainability practices to achieve performance outcomes, particularly in emerging economy contexts. The findings offer practical insights for managers and policymakers to integrate supply chain agility into SSCM practices to enhance sustainable performance.

Supply Chain Agility, Sustainable Supply Chain Management

1. Agyabeng‐Mensah, Y., Oloruntoba, R., Earnest, J., & Mohammadi, H. (2025). Sustainable supply chain management and performance outcomes: Supply chain practice view and mediated moderation perspectives. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aladayleh, M. J., Aladayleh, K. J., Lahuerta-Otero, E., & Cordero-Gutiérrez, R. (2024). Leveraging lean and green supply chain practices for sustainable supply chain performance: The moderating role of environmental orientation. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 16(3), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2024-0025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alfalla-Luque, R., Luján-García, D. E., & Marín-García, J. A. (2023). Supply chain agility and performance: Evidence from a meta-analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(10), 1587–1633. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-05-2022-0316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ataseven, C., & Nair, A. (2017). Assessment of supply chain integration and performance relationships: A meta-analytic investigation of literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bag, S., Dhamija, P., Luthra, S., & Huisingh, D. (2023). How big data analytics can help manufacturing companies strengthen supply chain resilience in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(4), 1141–1164. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cantele, S., Russo, I., Kirchoff, J. F., & Valcozzena, S. (2023). Supply chain agility and sustainability performance: A configurational approach to sustainable supply chain management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Das, D. (2017). Development and validation of a scale for measuring sustainable supply chain management practices and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Das, S., & Hassan, H. M. K. (2022). Impact of sustainable supply chain management and customer relationship management on organizational performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(6), 2140–2160. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2020-0441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., & Wamba, S. F. (2017). World class sustainable supply chain management: Critical review and further research directions. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(2), 332–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-07-2015-0112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Roubaud, D., Fosso Wamba, S., Giannakis, M., & Foropon, C. (2019). Big data analytics and organizational culture as complements to collaborative performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258591 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Gligor, D. M., Holcomb, M. C., & Stank, T. P. (2013). A multidisciplinary approach to supply chain agility: Conceptualization and scale development. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 94–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gligor, D., Gligor, N., Holcomb, M., & Bozkurt, S. (2019). Distinguishing between supply chain agility and resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-10-2017-0259 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gold, S., Seuring, S., & Beske, P. (2010). Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(4), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.207 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and logistics. Computers in Industry, 89, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.04.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Koh, S. L., Birkin, F., Lewis, L., & Cashman, A. (2007). Current issues of sustainable production, eco-supply chains and eco-logistics for sustainable development. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 7(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2007.012077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kot, S. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in small and medium enterprises. Sustainability, 10(4), 1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lee, S. M., Lee, D., & Schniederjans, M. J. (2011). Supply chain innovation and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(11), 1193–1214. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111178493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in SSCM should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Perera, W. D. C., Jayasinghe Mudalige, U. K., & Dissanayake, S. N. (2008). Adoption of in-plant pollution control techniques by small and medium-scale enterprises: Case of food processing sector in the North-Western Province. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg et al. (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 1–40). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From literature review to SSCM framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sharma, M., Dhir, A., AlKatheeri, H., Khan, M., & Ajmal, M. M. (2023). Greening of supply chain to drive performance through logical integration of supply chain resources. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3833–3847. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3340 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). Antecedents of supply chain agility. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Tondolo, V. A. G., et al. (2021). Sustainable operations practices and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(7), 1865–1888. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0552 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Wang, M., & Wang, B. (2023). Supply chain agility and firm sustainability. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 35(1), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2022-0059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Yadav, G., et al. (2020). Framework for sustainable supply chain challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Yoon, S. N., Lee, D., & Schniederjans, M. (2016). Innovation leadership and supply chain efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-H. (2008). Green supply chain management practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.11.029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Effectiveness of Logistics Management - A Case Study of: Future Supply Chain Solutions Ltd (FSC)
• The Effect of E-Informing on Procurement Performance of Public Universities in Kenya: The Case of Egerton University
• Barriers to Circular Supply Chain Implementation in Indian Textile SMEs: An Exploratory Qualitative Study
• Sustainable Supply Chain to Enhance the Environmental Performance in the Cleaning Detergents Manufacturing Industry: Case of Harare, Zimbabwe
• Exploring Innovative Frontiers: Digital Public Infrastructure and Multimodal Connectivity as Catalysts for MSME Supply Chain Transformation in India