The Impact of Technological Tools in Digital Literacy in Social Studies Education

The integration of technological tools has become essential in education, particularly in fostering digital literacy. Digital literacy involves the ability to collect, analyze, and apply information using technology, while also developing critical thinking skills such as questioning, problem-solving, and decision-making. The Basic Education Act of 2013 supports this by encouraging innovative teaching methods that make learning more engaging and effective, especially in subjects like social studies. Recent surveys highlight the growing reliance on digital tools in classrooms. A Gallup study (2019) found that most teachers, administrators, and principals prefer using digital learning tools regularly, citing benefits such as individualized learning, improved engagement, and instant access to student data. However, scholars like Kinzer & Wilber (2023) emphasize that technology alone is not enough; teachers must also be trained and prepared to integrate these tools effectively into their teaching practices. In the modern information era, technology plays a crucial role in enhancing literacy and broadening perspectives. Studies show that digital tools help learners identify, interpret, and evaluate information more effectively, while also strengthening interpersonal connections (Bacak et al., 2022; Hardiansyah et al., 2024). Access to online resources allows students to expand their knowledge instantly, demonstrating how technology can significantly enhance literacy skills. Despite these advancements, there is still limited understanding of how technological tools specifically impact digital literacy in Social Studies education (Espinosa et al., 2023). This study aims to explore how technology influences critical thinking, information evaluation, and content creation, while analyzing the experiences of both teachers and students. The findings are expected to provide strategies for integrating technology into classrooms and fostering collaborative learning among diverse learners. Ultimately, this research underscores the positive impact of technology on student engagement and academic achievement. It also provides valuable insights for educators and policymakers about the importance of investing in technology resources and teacher training. In Tanauan, the increasing use of apps, Learning Management Systems, and gamification strategies among junior high school Social Studies teachers highlights the relevance of this study, making the city an ideal setting to examine the role of technology in shaping digital literacy and leadership skills.

N/A

1. Abanil, A. (2019). Promoting Digital Literacy in the Philippine Education System. OpenGov Asia. https://opengovasia.com/2019/08/08/promoting-digital-literacy-in-the-philippine-education-system/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abella, Jhessie & Rosa, Elmer. (2023). Digital Literacy and Digital Competence of Selected Filipino Teachers: Basis for a Post-Pandemic Pedagogy. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4, 548-569. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i5.378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ainley, J., Schulz, W., & Fraillon, J. (2016). A global measure of digital and ICT literacy skills. UNESDOC Digital Library. https://research.acer.edu.au/ict_literacy/12/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ali, M.A., Ayari, S. & Ayari, A. (2012). Effects of use of technology on students’ motivation. Journal of Teaching and Education, ISSN: 2165-6266, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 407-412. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Anagün, Ş. S. (2018). Shifting roles of teachers in technology-enhanced learning environments: A review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(3), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Andersson, L. (2021). It’s critical: The role of critical thinking in media and information literacy. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5763719 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Antonio, J. M. A., & Tamban, V. E. (2020). Effectiveness of Gamification on Learner’s Performance and Attitude towards Mathematics Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. UIJRT, 3(3), 13-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ashikuzzaman, M. (2023, December 26). What is Information Seeking Behaviour? Library & Information Science Education Network. https://www.lisedunetwork.com/information-seeking/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Aslan, S. (2020). Analysis of Digital Literacy Self-Efficacy Levels of Pre-service Teachers. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Audrin, C. & Audrin, B. (2022). Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: a systematic literature review using text mining. Education and Information Technologies, 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bangcaya, H. O., Olvis, P. R., Disca, B. Y., Comoda, J. T., & Taborada, J. H. (2020). Play as you learn: Gamification and its effect on the learning outcomes and motivation of students in science. Philippine EJournals. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Baterna, H. B., Mina, T. D. G., & Rogayan, D. V. (2020c). Digital Literacy of STEM Senior High School Students: Basis for Enhancement Program. International Journal of Technology in Education, 3(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.v3i2.28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bećirović, S., Brdarević-Čeljo, A., & Delić, H. (2021). The use of digital technology in foreign language learning. SN Social Sciences, 1(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00254-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bolden, F. (2019, August). How technology can increase student engagement. TeachHUB. https://www.teachhub.com/technology-in-the-classroom/2019/08/how-technology-can-increase-student-engagement/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational Technology: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Boudadi, N. A., & Gutiérrez-Colón, M. (2020). Effect of Gamification on students’ motivation and learning achievement in Second Language Acquisition within higher education: a literature review 2011-2019. The EuroCALL Review, 28(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2020.12974 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Caballero, L. S., Ferrer, M. M., & Tiria, R. A. (2022). The role of gamification in the academic performance of junior high school students in language subject. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359864945_The_Role_of_Gamification_in_the_Academic_Performance_of_Junior_High_School_Students_in_Language_Subject [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Caballes, Dennis & Pizarro, Marlon & Vianzon, Jerwin. (2024). Digital Literacy of Elementary Teachers and its Relation to Performing their Various School Roles Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10594619 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Cabasan, R. A. (2024b). Effective Technology Integration: Closing the Digital Gap among High School Students. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(8). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Campillo-Ferrer, J.-M., & Miralles-Martínez, P. (2020). Gamification in social studies education: Enhancing digital literacy through interactive learning apps. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1003-1020. https://link.springer.com/journal/11423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Carada, R. C. C. I. G. (2023, August 10). Gamification tools in teaching Filipino subject and reading comprehension. EPRA Journals. https://eprajournals.com/IJMR/article/11138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Castaño-Muñoz, J., Duart, J. M., & Sancho-Vinuesa, T. (2013). The Internet in face-to-face higher education: Can interactive learning improve academic achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Cowling, M., Sim, K.N., Orlando, J. et al. (2024). Untangling Digital Safety, literacy, and Wellbeing in School activities for 10 to 13-Year-Old Students. Educ Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13183-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Cruz, J. P., & Reyes, A. M. (2021). Evaluating digital literacy in Philippine schools: A focus on critical thinking and evaluation. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 15(2), 123-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. D’Angelo, C. (2018, July 9). The Impact of Technology: Student engagement and success. Pressbooks. https://pressbooks.pub/techandcurriculum/chapter/engagement-and-success/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. De Vera, C. T., Mastul, A. H., & Jayme, C. B. (2023). Understanding the Use of EduTech in Schools in the Philippines: Recommendations for Effectiveness. e-Science Literacy, 2(2), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.56741/esl.v2i02.307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Department of Education. (2022, May 10). DepEd highlights Digital Rise Program as key player in addressing challenges in education quality. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2022/05/10/deped-highlights-digital-rise-program-as-key-player-in-addressing-challenges-in-education-quality/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Dyer, K. M. (2016). Mobile learning in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative analysis of the nature and impact of handheld mobile devices in Zambian secondary schools. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Bath. https://doi.org/10.15125/BATH-00269 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. eSchool News. (2024, January 2). Technology tools used in teaching and learning. https://www.eschoolnews.com/digital-learning/2024/01/03/technology-tools-used-in-teaching-and-learning/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency framework. Education Tech Research Dev, 68, 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Forssell, L., & Hassan, M. (2024). Learning management systems in the social sciences: Improving digital literacy through multimedia resources. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(2), 181-195. https://link.springer.com/journal/11423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Frias, J. A. B., Flores, J. A., & F, M. T. (2024). Effectiveness of interactive educational applications in improving the content mastery of selected grade 9 AP students. Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment, 8(2), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v8i2.157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Galindo-Domínguez, H., Bezanilla, M. J., & Campo, L. (2024). Relationship between social media use and critical thinking in university students. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12953-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Garcia, M. B. (2017). E-Learning technology adoption in the Philippines: An investigation of factors affecting Filipino college students’ acceptance of learning management systems. The International Journal of E-Learning and Educational Technologies in the Digital Media, 3(3), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.56741/esl.v2i02.307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Gaskell, A. (2018). Educational technology for development: New roles and new challenges. UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002625/262533E.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Göksün, D., & Gürsoy, F. (2024). The role of gamification in enhancing digital literacy and engagement in social sciences education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 120-134. https://link.springer.com/journal/10758 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Geary, J. (n.d.). Information Literacy Skills and College Students: A Mixed-Methods, Action Research study of students’ Knowledge and Self-Efficacy for applying information Literacy skills to their academic and social lives. Scholar Commons. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/6190/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Gutiérrez-Ángel, N., Sánchez-García, J. N., Mercader-Rubio, I., García-Martín, J., & Brito-Costa, S. (2022). Digital literacy in the university setting: A literature review of empirical studies between 2010 and 2021. Front Psychol, 13, 896800. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896800 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Gallup, Inc. (2019). Education Technology Use in Schools. https://www.newschools.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Gallup-Ed-Tech-Use-in-Schools-2.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. OECD. (2017). Gender imbalances in the teaching profession. Education Indicators in Focus. https://doi.org/10.1787/54f0ef95-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Hassan, M. (2024, November 14). Descriptive Research Design - types, methods and examples. Research Method. https://researchmethod.net/descriptive-research-design/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ingersoll, R., Merrill, L., & Stuckey, D. (2014). Seven Trends: The Transformation of the Teaching Force. CPRE. https://doi.org/10.12698/cpre.2014.rr80 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Hughes, J., & Baker, T. (2020). The Impact of Teacher Age Diversity on Teaching Methods and Student Engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 345-360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Jacob. (2023, July 9). Gamification Strategies in Education: The Ultimate Guide [2023]. Gamification Hub. https://www.gamificationhub.org/gamification-strategies-in-education/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Javier, B. F. (2021). Practices of Filipino public high school teachers on digital teaching and learning technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic: Basis for learning action cell sessions. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research. DOI: 10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.67 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Karasova, J., & Nehyba, J. (2023). Student-centered teacher responses to student behavior in the classroom: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1156530 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Kong, S.-C., & Abelson, H. (2022). Computational thinking education in K–12: Artificial intelligence literacy and physical computing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13375.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Kumar, J. A., Annamalai, N., Ramayah, T., & Osman, S. (2021). Investigating the Use of Learning Management System (LMS) for Distance Education in Malaysia: A Mixed-Method Approach. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), ep313. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Kurt, S. (2023, September 25). Connectivism Learning Theory. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/connectivism-learning-theory/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Laguna, R. D., & Santos, M. A. (2019). Digital literacy and critical thinking skills among Filipino students: A review of current practices. Journal of Education Research, 12(3), 45-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Law, N., Woo, D., De La Torre, J., & Wong, K. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 146. https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/262055/1/Content.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Li, M., Ma, S., & Shi, Y. (2023). Examining the effectiveness of gamification as a tool promoting teaching and learning in educational settings: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1253549 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Libago, M. A. R. P., Jajalla, J. B., & Royo, J. C. (2024). Assessing the digital literacy among freshmen college students: A descriptive-comparative study. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 10(1). Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Lorenzo, Arnold. (2016). Effectiveness of the computer and internet literacy project in public high schools of Tarlac Province, Philippines. 15. 38-46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Mahdi, S. (2023). Effective Communication in Learning: teacher strategies and their impact on student learning outcomes. International Journal of Linguistics Communication and Broadcasting, 1(4), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.46326/ijlcb.v1i4.26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. MIT Sloan. (2021b, February 11). MIT Sloan study finds thinking style impacts how people use social media. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/press/mit-sloan-study-finds-thinking-style-impacts-how-people-use-social-media [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Mitra, S. (2014). The future of schooling: Children and learning at the edge of chaos. Prospects, 44(4), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9327-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Mishna, F., Cook, C., Gadalla, T., Daciuk, J., & Solomon, S. (2010). Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(3), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01040.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Morato, P. R. (2022, June 2). Digital literacy. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/opinion/2022/06/03/2185751/digital-literacy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Nguyen, L. a. T., & Habók, A. (2023). Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: a review. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(1), 305–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00257-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. National Center for Education Statistics. (2021, February 25). Digest of Education Statistics, 2019. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2021009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Nguyen, L.A.T., & Habók, A. (2024). Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: a review. J. Comput. Educ., 11, 305–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00257-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Nob, J. M. R., Roble, D., & Lomibao, L. (2024). Unveiling the effects of gamification on math learning: A literature review in the Philippine context. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382273834_Unveiling_the_Effects_of_Gamification_on_Math_Learning_A_Literature_Review_in_the_Philippine_Context [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Nueva, M. G. C. (2019). A Literature Review on the Current Technology in Education: An Examination of Teachers’ Use of Technology and Its Association to Digital Inequality in School. De La Salle University – Manila. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Office of Educational Technology. (2015). Office of Educational Technology. https://tech.ed.gov/netp/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Okoli, A. C. P. (2017). Relating Communication Competence to Teaching Effectiveness: Implication for Teacher Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(3), 150–154. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1131529.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Outhwaite, L. A., & Van Herwegen, J. (2023). Educational apps and learning: Current evidence on design and evaluation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1268–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Padohinog, E. C., Balsicas, N. W., & Hingada, L. C. (2022). The effectiveness of Google Classroom and Blackboard Learn: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8023096 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. PBEd. (n.d.). State of Philippine Education Report 2023. PBEd. https://pbed.ph/blogs/47/PBEd/State%20of%20Philippine%20Education%20Report%202023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Punzalan, Christopher & Laudato, Eunice. (2021). Digital Literacy of Selected Senior High School Students: An Analysis for Online Education Readiness. International Graduate Teacher Education Summit (IGTES). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Salinas, J., Cabrera, D., & Lopez, M. (2020). The impact of Learning Management Systems on digital literacy and engagement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 57-70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Sharma, S. (2023, July 5). Supporting student engagement with technology. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-technology-support-student-engagement [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Sparks, J. R., Katz, I. R., & Beile, P. M. (2016). Assessing digital information literacy in higher education: A review of existing frameworks and assessments with recommendations for next-generation assessment. Educational Testing Service (ETS) Research Report Series, RR-16-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Stenersen, E. (2020). Critical thinking as part of digital skills in EFL education. A qualitative study of how teachers and their students understand the concept of critical thinking. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/63960563/Critical_thinking_as_part_of_digital_skills_in_EFL_education_A_qualitative_study_of_how_teachers_and_their_students_understand_the_concept_of_critical_thinking [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Steinbach, R. (2024, October). The Digital Classroom: Enhancing student Engagement through Educational Technology. Crowdmark. https://crowdmark.com/blog/the-digital-classroom-enhancing-student-engagement-through-educational-technology/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Stošić, L. (2015). The importance of educational technology in teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, vol. 3, no.1, pp. 111-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. UNESCO. (2023b). Technology in education: a case study on the Philippines. https://doi.org/10.54676/xkhi4627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. VRITIMES. (2024, August 17). The Philippine Media and Information Literacy Landscape: An Overview. Press Release Distribution Service. https://www.vritimes.com/ph/articles/ce88f943-32fe-11ef-a26a-0a58a9feac02/e7ea8aee-5c8a-11ef-a7a8-0a58a9feac02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Thomas K. F. CHIU. (n.d.). Google Scholar Profile. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=waxoip4AAAAJ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Tomczyk, Ł. (2019). Skills in the area of digital safety as a key component of digital literacy among teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09980-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Taskiran, C., & Salur, M. (n.d.). Analysis of the opinions of social studies teachers on digital literacy skills. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1302224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. UNICEF, DepEd (2023). Learning Recovery Programme: Supporting Multigrade Schools in Remote Areas. UNICEF Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Vermeulen, M., Van Acker, F., Kreijns, K., et al. (2015). Does transformational leadership encourage teachers’ use of digital learning materials. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43, 1006-1025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Semantics Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-comparative-analysis-of-international-frameworks-Voogt-Roblin/831ef07db8a589b91a508e0118f6f3c2a1f18c19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Weber, H., & Hillmert, S. (2019). Information-seeking behaviour and academic success in higher education: Which search strategies matter for grade differences among university students and how does this relevance differ by field of study? Higher Education, 77(4), 657–678. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45116941 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Woodcock, B., Middleton, A., & Nortcliffe, A. (2012). Considering the smartphone learner: An investigation into student interest in the use of personal technology to enhance their learning. Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 1(1). doi:10.7190/seej.v1i1.38 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Yünkül, E., & Güneş, A. M. (2022). The relationship between prospective teachers’ digital literacy skills, attitude towards the teaching profession and academic motivations. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 17(3), 140–163. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2022.461.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. In Globalisation, comparative education and policy research (pp. 35–50). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study