The Impact of the SCOR Model on the Efficiency of Supply Chains in Vietnamese Enterprises

Effectively manage the supply chain with an important step forward model that enhances competitive advantages for businesses. Therefore, the research objective is to identify the components of the supply chain reference model (SCOR) including: Planning; Purchase; Manufacture; Distribution; Recall impacts supply chain efficiency. The study uses qualitative combined with quantitative methods, using 5-point Likert scale and linear structural model analysis (SEM) for analysis. The research results show that the SCOR model components such as planning, purchasing, production, distribution and collection have an impact on the efficiency of supply chain management, thereby helping enterprises to manage and operate the supply chain. appropriate solutions to enhance the competitiveness of enterprises.

SCOR, Supply chain, Management, Effective

1. Barratt. (2012). Exploring internal and external supply chain linkages: evidence from the field. Journal of Operations Management. 514-528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chehbi-Gamoura S. Derrouiche R. Damand D. Barth M . (2020). Insights from big data analytics in supply chain management: an all-inclusive literature review using the SCOR model. Prod Plann Control 31(5):. 355-382. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Du. L. (2010). Acquiring Competitive advantage in industry through Supply Chain Integration: a case study of Yue Yuen Industrial Holdings Ltd. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 20 (5). 527-543. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fasika Bete Georgise. Klaus-Dieter Thoben and Marcus Seifert. (2012). Adapting the SCOR Model to Suit the Different Scenarios: A Literature Review & Research Agenda. International Journal of Business and Management. Vol.7. No.6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hair.JF. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. 6th. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice –Hall . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hugos. M. H. (2017). The Essentials of Supply chain management . International publish. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ipek. K. S. (2011). The effect of supply chain integration on information sharing: Enhancing the supply chain performance. Procedia Social ang Behavioral Sciences. 24 (1). 630-649. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kiệm. P. V. (2013). 2013. Tạp chí khoa học ĐHQG Hà Nội. Kinh tế và kinh doanh tập 29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kiisler A. Hilmola O-P. (2020). Modelling wholesale company’s supply chain using system dynamics. Transp Telecommunication 21(2):. 149-1582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kim. S. W. (2009). An Investigation on the direct and Indirect Effect of Supply chain integration on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics. 119 (2). 328-346. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kottala. S. Y. (2019). An Enterprises Investigation of Supply chain operations reference model practices and Supply chain performance. Supply chain Operations . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lambert. D. M.. Cooper. M. C. . (2000). Issues in Supply Chain Management. Journal of Industrial Marketing Management. 29 (1). 65-83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lee. C. W. (2007). Relationship between supply chain performance and degree of linkage among supplier. internal integration. and customer. Supply Chain Management. A International Journal. 12 (6). 444-452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Li. J. S. (2006). A strategic analysis of inter organizational information sharing. Decision Support Systems. 42 (1). 251-266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Magnusson. L. (2010). Performance management using SCOR. Ericsson AB. Supply Chain Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nguyễn Đình Thọ - Nguyễn Thị Mai Trang. (2011). Nghiên cứu khoa học Marketing ứng dụng mô hình cấu trúc tuyến tính SEM. Tp.HCM: NXB Lao Động. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Roussel. S. C. (2005). Strategic Supply Chain Management . The 5 disciplines for Top Performance. 2nd edtion.: McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Thakkar. J. (2009). Supply chain performance meansurement framwork for small and Medium scale enterprises - Benchemarking. An International Journal. Vol 16 No.5. 702-723. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zhao. B. H. (2008). The Impact of power and relationship commitment in the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. Journal of Operations Management. 26 (3). 368-388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria