The Imperative of Timely Pedagogical Feedback: A Catalyst for Sustainable Educational Reform and Human Capital Development in Sierra Leone’s Higher Education Sector

Timely pedagogical feedback transcends its traditional role of informing students of grades; it functions as a critical systemic mechanism that shapes learning trajectories, fortifies institutional integrity, and guides national education policy. Grounded in established learning and curriculum theory, this paper argues that prompt, actionable feedback is a non-negotiable prerequisite for multi-level accountability and development, encompassing student metacognition, lecturer reflexivity, and administrative quality assurance. Drawing specifically on the resource-constrained context of Sierra Leone’s higher education (HE) system, this analysis delineates the systemic costs of delayed feedback and proposes a concrete framework for cultural and structural reform. The core recommendation is the mandatory, timely return of marked scripts to students, repositioning feedback from a post-assessment ritual to an active pedagogical instrument for human capital development. This approach aligns with recent scholarship emphasizing feedback literacy and digital feedback mechanisms as essential for enhancing student agency (Winstone & Nash, 2023; Liu et al., 2025).

Timely Feedback; Pedagogical Feedback; Higher Education

1. Afify, M. (2025). The Impact of Interaction between Timing of Feedback Provision in Distance E-Learning and Learning Styles on achieving Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Amin, M. A., et al. (2024). Effects of AI-Assisted Feedback via Generative Chat on Academic Writing in Higher Education Students: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1396. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dlamini, C. (2024). Workplace Mental Health Status Among Academic Staff: Psychological Distress, Burnout, and Organisational Culture at a South African University. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 1410. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dweck, C. S. (2020). The Growth Mindset: Why Students’ Motivation and Self-Regulation Matter in Higher Education. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fyfe, G., et al. (2023). The effect of feedback on students' subsequent results: A results-based approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(8), 1146-1160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hill, J., & West, H. (2020). Towards faster feedback in higher education through digitally mediated dialogic loops. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 79-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ilie, V. (2024). The Impact of Feedback on Students' Academic Performance. Annals of the University of Craiova, the Psychology-Pedagogy series, XXIII(46), 188-201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Liu, Y., et al. (2025). Feedback, reflection and psychological safety: rethinking assessment for student well-being in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Panadero, E., & Broadbent, J. (2020). A scope and sequence for self-regulated learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 31, 100346. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Pitt, E., & Quinlan, K. M. (2022). Educators know that assessment and feedback practices are among the most effective levers for improving student learning in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(6), 841–845. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rani, L. (2025). Exploring new feedback practices paradigm in higher education: students' perspectives. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(2), 1124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. TEQSA. (2022). Effective feedback in digital learning environments. Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Winstone, N. E., & Carless, D. (2020). Designing Effective Feedback Processes in Higher Education: A Learning-Focused Approach. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Winstone, N. E., & Nash, R. A. (2023). The role of students’ psychological dispositions and perceptions in feedback use. Learning and Instruction, 83, 101684. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study