The Influence of Classroom Reading Anxiety on Top-Down, Bottom-Up Reading Anxiety and Reading Strategies
Authors
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Masai, Johor (Malaysia)
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Masai, Johor (Malaysia)
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Masai, Johor (Malaysia)
Universiti Teknologi MARA (Pasir Gudang Johor Malaysia)
Menara CIMB, KL Central (Malaysia)
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100801052
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 15318-15332
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-09
Accepted: 2026-09-14
Published: 2026-09-24
Abstract
Reading anxiety remains a significant psychological barrier that affects second-language (L2) acquisition and cognitive text processing. This quantitative study explored the influence of classroom reading anxiety on top-down and bottom-up reading anxiety, as well as the perceived use of reading strategy. The data were gathered using a 39-item, 5-point Likert scale survey administered to 124 tertiary diploma and foundation students at Universiti Teknologi MARA. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses (t-tests, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation) revealed moderate levels of overall reading anxiety and higher usage of problem-solving reading strategies. Independent samples t-tests indicated no statistically significant differences in reading anxiety or strategy use based on self-rated English proficiency or reading medium preferences. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated strong, positive, statistically significant relationships between classroom reading anxiety and both top-down anxiety (r=0.572,p<0.001) and bottom-up anxiety (r=0.649,p<0.001). However, no significant correlation was found between classroom reading anxiety and online reading strategy deployment (r=0.083,p=0.360). The findings imply that while the pedagogical environment directly heightens cognitive processing anxieties, learners maintain autonomous strategic behaviour regardless of their anxiety levels. The findings suggest that pedagogical practices addressing classroom-related stressors and cognitive processing difficulties may be considered in L2 reading instruction. Future research should examine these relationships using longitudinal, mixed-methods, and intervention-based designs.
Keywords
classroom reading anxiety, top-down processing, bottom-up processing, reading strategies, esl learners, affective filter
Downloads
References
1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024) Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-L earning@CS, 114-119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Amer, A., AL Barwani,T., Ibrahim, M. (2010) Student Teachers’ Perceived Use of Online Reading Strategies. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), Vol 6(4), pp 102-113. Retrieved from httpe://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study if Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Miao,Q.Q., & Vibulphol, J. (2020) English as a Foreign language Reading Anxiety of Chinese Students. International Education Studies, 14(3), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Rahmat,N.H, Arepin, M., and Sulaiman,S. (2020) The Cycle of Academic Reading Fear Among Undergraduates. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 16(3), 265-274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Rumelhart, D. (1980) Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition. In: Spiro, R., Bruce, B. and Brewer, W., Eds., Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, Erlbaum Associates, Mahway, 33-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Vetter, T.R. (2017) Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When , Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesth Analg, 12595), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C.. (2021) Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Zoghi, M. (2012). An Instrument for EFL Reading Anxiety: Inventory Construction and Preliminary Validation. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9, 31-56. 64-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ies/article/view/0/44773 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study