The Influence of Digital Literacy and Self- Efficacy as a Predictors of Student Engagement of Computer System Servicing Senior Highschool Students

This study examined the influence of digital literacy and self-efficacy on the engagement of Senior High School students in the Computer Systems Servicing strand at Lorenzo S. Sarmiento Sr. National High School. Using a quantitative, non-experimental research design with descriptive correlational techniques, data were collected through structured questionnaires. The study assessed the levels of digital literacy, self-efficacy, and student engagement and analyzed the relationships and predictive effects of the independent variables on engagement. Findings revealed that students possess high levels of digital literacy and self-efficacy, with citizenship and character as significant predictors within digital literacy and belief in personal ability within self-efficacy. Correlational analyses indicated positive relationships between both independent variables and student engagement. Multiple regression results further confirm that the domains of digital literacy and self-efficacy collectively influence student engagement, highlighting the importance of both technical skills and personal competence. The study underscores the need for educational interventions that develop students’ digital skills, ethical awareness, and confidence to enhance engagement, academic performance, and preparedness for future educational and professional challenges.

Computer System Servicing, Digital Literacy, Student Engagement, Computer System Servicing

1. Bandura, A. (2020). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bhandari, P. (2021). Correlational research: Definition, types, advantages and disadvantages. Scribbr. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/correlational-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chung, E. (2020). Promoting digital literacy and engagement in secondary education. Computers & Education, 151, 103866. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chung, E., Kim, H., & Lim, H. (2020). Promoting digital citizenship among high school students: Implications for responsible technology use. Computers & Education, 150, 103850. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Delos Santos, M. R. (2022). Digital literacy and its impact on student engagement in Batangas high schools. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fredricks, J. A. (2020). Student engagement: Exploring the link between motivation, learning, and achievement. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fredricks, J. A. (2021). Student engagement: A global perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09532-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Garcia, L. P. (2021). Participation trends in senior high school students in Davao City: A digital learning perspective. Mindanao Journal of Education, 7(1), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2020). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (12th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hsu, L., Ching, Y.-H., & Grabowski, B. (2021). Enhancing students’ creativity and collaboration through digital learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2215–2234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kim, H. J. (2022). Online learning and student engagement in South Korean high schools. Asian Journal of Education, 40(3), 211–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Mahoney, D. (2020). Academic self-efficacy and engagement: Predicting student success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 883–895. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Rogat, T., & Koskey, K. (2021). Motivating and engaging students through self-efficacy and mastery experiences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 64, 101950. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Martin, F. (2020). Digital literacy for 21st-century learners: Building competencies for academic success. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(8), 1431–1454. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Martin, F., Sunley, R., & Turner, A. (2020). Digital literacy for 21st-century learners: A framework for integrating technology into education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(8), 1431–1454. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mendoza, A. S. (2023). Classroom participation patterns of vocational students in Digos City. Davao Educational Review, 5(1), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nguyen, L. (2021). Digital literacy and student engagement in secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7589–7607. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nguyen, L., Barton, M., & Nguyen, T. (2021). Digital literacy and academic engagement in secondary education. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7589–7607. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (2021). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (2nd ed.). IAP – Information Age Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ramos, J. T. (2023). Self-efficacy and student engagement in Iloilo senior high schools. Visayas Journal of Educational Psychology, 11(2), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Reeve, J. (2021). Understanding motivation and emotion (8th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Reyes, C. P. (2021). Digital literacy and academic performance of students in Quezon City. Philippine Journal of Technology in Education, 9(3), 77–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Schneider, M., & Wagner, T. (2021). Digital distractions and engagement in German vocational schools. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 73(4), 543–561. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Schunk, D. H. (2021). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Skinner, E. A. (2020). Motivation and engagement in school: Theory, research, and practice. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Torralba, R. F. (2022). Student engagement in Tagum City senior high schools: A digital perspective. Mindanao Educational Studies, 8(2), 60–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Torres, E. D. (2021). Self-efficacy and learning engagement among Manila senior high students. Philippine Educational Journal, 13(1), 101–116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Valdez, A. L. (2023). Digital literacy, self-efficacy, and engagement in Cebu high schools. Visayan Journal of Education, 10(1), 15–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zimmerman, B. J. (2020). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives and practical strategies. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Influence of Korean Drama to Cultural Identity of Students in One Private School
• Children’s Vulnerability in Coastal Slums during Cyclone: A Case Study of Puri Municipality Area
• Mitigating Youth Restiveness Through Social Studies Education: Implications for Institutional Stability, Civic Responsibility, and Student Empowerment in Nigeria
• Students’ Awareness of Sexual Harassment Forms at Campus II, University of Labor and Social Affairs
• Influence of Social Studies Curriculum Content on Youth Restiveness and Civic Responsibility Among Secondary School Students in Nigeria