The Influence of Goal Orientations on Online Motivation: A PLS-SEM Analysis

This study investigates the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic goal orientations on online motivation using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Grounded in Expectancy-Value Theory, Social Cognitive Theory, and Self-Determination Theory, the study examines how goal orientations affect three motivational dimensions: expectancy, value, and social support in online learning environments. A quantitative research design was employed, and data were collected through a questionnaire distributed to students from different academic clusters. The instrument measured expectancy, value, social support, intrinsic goal orientation, and extrinsic goal orientation using a five-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using SmartPLS 4 through measurement and structural model assessments. The findings revealed that both intrinsic and extrinsic goal orientations significantly influenced expectancy, value, and social support. Intrinsic goal orientation showed a large effect on expectancy and a medium effect on value, indicating that internally motivated learners possess stronger confidence and perceive online learning as meaningful and beneficial. Extrinsic goal orientation demonstrated a large effect on value and a medium effect on social support, suggesting that external rewards and recognition positively encourage students’ participation in online learning. The model also showed strong predictive relevance and satisfactory reliability and validity. The findings support previous studies emphasizing the importance of motivation, self-efficacy, and supportive learning environments in enhancing online learning engagement. This study contributes to the understanding of online motivation and provides practical implications for educators in designing motivating and supportive digital learning environments.

Goal Orientation; Online Motivation; Intrinsic Motivation; Extrinsic Motivation; PLS-SEM

1. Bandura, A. (1971). Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Beik, A., & Cho, Y. (2024). Effects of goal orientation on online learning: A meta-analysis of differences in Korea and US. Current Psychology, 43(2), 1496–1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04389-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two Structural Equation Models:LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hair, J. F. , Mathews, L. , M., Mathews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Han, T., Xu, G., & Lu, W. (2025). Examining the Effects of Different Types of Achievement Goal Orientation on Undergraduate Students’ Engagement in Distance Learning: The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hauf, S. , R. N. F. , S. M. , R. C. M. (2024). The Importance and Performance in PLS-SEM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78(2024)(100723). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Husni, D. (2026). Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Motivation in Online Learning: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. Global Perspectives in Education Journal, 2(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.64008/gpej.v2i1.51 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ramayah, T. , Cheak, F., Ting, H., & memon, M. A. (2018). Partial least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using Smart PLS 3.0: An Updated Guide and practical guide to statistical analysis (2nd ed). . Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ringle, C. M. , S. M. (2016). Gain more insights from your PLS-SEM results: The Importance-performance map analysis. . Industrial Management & Data System, 116(9), 1865–1886. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Using importance-performance matrix analysis (IPMA) in PLS-SEM: Using SmartPLS 3. . Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3169–3177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic , social development , and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sudarnoto, L. F. N., Handoko, M. T., Riyanto, A., & Arini, D. P. (2025). The impact of online learning, learning motivation, and interpersonal relationships on students’ wellbeing. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11(2025), 101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101485 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wigfield & Eccles. (2000). Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Yeh, Y. C., Kwok, O. M., Chien, H. Y., Sweany, N. W., Baek, E., & McIntosh, W. A. (2019). How college students’ achievement goal orientations predict their expected online learning outcome: The mediation roles of self-regulated learning strategies and supportive online learning behaviors. Online Learning Journal, 23(4), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ziegenfuss, J. Y. , C. A. E. , J. M. D. M. M. J. T. E. K. , M. C. (2021). Impact of Demographic Surevy Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice, 14(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Online And Distance Learning (ODL) and Hybrid Learning in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Qualitative Exploration of Effects and Challenges on Law Students