The Influence of Indigenous Knowledge Systems on Climate Change: Insights from Marymount Teachers College, Mutare, Zimbabwe
Authors
Marymount Teacher's College, Mutare, Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe)
Marymount Teacher's College, Mutare, Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe)
Marymount Teacher's College, Mutare, Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe)
Marymount Teacher's College, Mutare, Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900247
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 3699-3708
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-19
Accepted: 2026-09-24
Published: 2026-10-07
Abstract
The livelihood of indigenous communities and the conservation of biodiversity depend on safeguarding traditional knowledge systems (IKS) as vital resources for climate resilience. In a rapidly globalizing world, IKS faces the risk of erosion, necessitating new forms of protection and integration into education. This exploratory mixed‑methods study investigated the influence of indigenous knowledge systems on climate change mitigation at Marymount Teachers College, Mutare, Zimbabwe. A stratified purposive sample of 50 participants comprising both lecturers and student teachers engaged in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) programs was studied using questionnaires with closed and open‑ended items. Quantitative results revealed that beekeeping (38%) and horticulture (31%) were most frequently perceived as impactful projects, while qualitative coding highlighted themes of ecological stewardship, cultural taboos, and waste‑management practices. Integration of the two strands showed that perceptions of climate benefits were strong, but objectively demonstrated outcomes were limited, with illustrative monitoring suggesting potential improvements in tree survival, species richness, soil moisture, and waste diversion. The findings underscore that Marymount’s projects primarily foster ecological awareness and embed heritage‑based practices into teacher education, rather than providing direct evidence of large‑scale climate mitigation. Recommendations include formally integrating IKS into college curricula, strengthening collaborative research with communities, and conducting rigorous quantitative studies with environmental indicators such as carbon‑footprint audits and biodiversity indices to validate perceptions. As an exploratory study, these results provide preliminary insights into the role of IKS in higher education climate initiatives, laying the groundwork for more robust, evidence‑based investigations
Keywords
Traditional knowledge, oral traditions, indigenous people
Downloads
References
1. Briggs, J. (2005). The use of indigenous knowledge in development: Problems and challenges. Progress in Development Studies, 5(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993405ps105oa (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century (IDS Discussion Paper No. 296). Institute of Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Department for International Development (DFID). (2000). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. DFID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Egeruoh-Adindu, I. (2022). Leveraging indigenous knowledge for effective environmental governance in West Africa. Beijing Law Review, 13(4), 931–947. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2022.134060 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Gaoshebe, T. (2014). African indigenous food security strategies and climate change adaptation in South Africa. Journal of Human Ecology, 48(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2014.11906777 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2019). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 17(6), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2424 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Mafongoya, P., & Ajayi, O. (2017). Indigenous knowledge systems and climate change management in Africa. CTA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Magni, G. (2016). Indigenous knowledge and implications for the sustainable development agenda. European Journal of Education, 51(4), 548–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Mapara, J. (2009). Indigenous weather forecasting systems in Zimbabwe: Juxtaposing post-colonial theory. The Journal of Pan African Studies, 3(3), 139–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806291790 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820503 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. United Nations. (2022). United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. https://www.un.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Wilson, K. (2014). Payment for ‘ecosystem services’ and the ‘green economy’: Greenwashing or something new? Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 5(2), 168–191. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2014.02.04 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar