The Influence of Indigenous Knowledge Systems on Climate Change: Insights from Marymount Teachers College, Mutare, Zimbabwe

Authors

Chambiwa Elijah

Marymount Teacher's College, Mutare, Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe)

Vimbai Matsongoni

Marymount Teacher's College, Mutare, Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe)

Mashamba Tarashika

Marymount Teacher's College, Mutare, Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe)

Mandongwe Shingirai

Marymount Teacher's College, Mutare, Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900247

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 3699-3708

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-19

Accepted: 2026-09-24

Published: 2026-10-07

Abstract

The livelihood of indigenous communities and the conservation of biodiversity depend on safeguarding traditional knowledge systems (IKS) as vital resources for climate resilience. In a rapidly globalizing world, IKS faces the risk of erosion, necessitating new forms of protection and integration into education. This exploratory mixed‑methods study investigated the influence of indigenous knowledge systems on climate change mitigation at Marymount Teachers College, Mutare, Zimbabwe. A stratified purposive sample of 50 participants comprising both lecturers and student teachers engaged in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) programs was studied using questionnaires with closed and open‑ended items. Quantitative results revealed that beekeeping (38%) and horticulture (31%) were most frequently perceived as impactful projects, while qualitative coding highlighted themes of ecological stewardship, cultural taboos, and waste‑management practices. Integration of the two strands showed that perceptions of climate benefits were strong, but objectively demonstrated outcomes were limited, with illustrative monitoring suggesting potential improvements in tree survival, species richness, soil moisture, and waste diversion. The findings underscore that Marymount’s projects primarily foster ecological awareness and embed heritage‑based practices into teacher education, rather than providing direct evidence of large‑scale climate mitigation. Recommendations include formally integrating IKS into college curricula, strengthening collaborative research with communities, and conducting rigorous quantitative studies with environmental indicators such as carbon‑footprint audits and biodiversity indices to validate perceptions. As an exploratory study, these results provide preliminary insights into the role of IKS in higher education climate initiatives, laying the groundwork for more robust, evidence‑based investigations

Keywords

Traditional knowledge, oral traditions, indigenous people

Downloads

References

1. Briggs, J. (2005). The use of indigenous knowledge in development: Problems and challenges. Progress in Development Studies, 5(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993405ps105oa (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century (IDS Discussion Paper No. 296). Institute of Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department for International Development (DFID). (2000). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. DFID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Egeruoh-Adindu, I. (2022). Leveraging indigenous knowledge for effective environmental governance in West Africa. Beijing Law Review, 13(4), 931–947. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2022.134060 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gaoshebe, T. (2014). African indigenous food security strategies and climate change adaptation in South Africa. Journal of Human Ecology, 48(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2014.11906777 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2019). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 17(6), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2424 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mafongoya, P., & Ajayi, O. (2017). Indigenous knowledge systems and climate change management in Africa. CTA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Magni, G. (2016). Indigenous knowledge and implications for the sustainable development agenda. European Journal of Education, 51(4), 548–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mapara, J. (2009). Indigenous weather forecasting systems in Zimbabwe: Juxtaposing post-colonial theory. The Journal of Pan African Studies, 3(3), 139–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806291790 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820503 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. United Nations. (2022). United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. https://www.un.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wilson, K. (2014). Payment for ‘ecosystem services’ and the ‘green economy’: Greenwashing or something new? Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 5(2), 168–191. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2014.02.04 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles