The Influence of Leadership, Organizational Culture, and Work Motivation on Teacher Performance in Public Junior High Schools in Ngaglik District

Authors

Akmal Fatkhurrozi

Educational Human Resource Management, Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta (Indonesia)

Anik Ghufron

Educational Human Resource Management, Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0257

Subject Category: Human Resource Management

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 3266-3269

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-24

Accepted: 2026-04-30

Published: 2026-05-22

Abstract

This study aims to examine the specific effects of leadership, organizational culture, and work motivation on teacher performance. The objective is to identify which factors predominantly drive educational quality in public junior high schools in Ngaglik District, Yogyakarta. The methodology employed a quantitative ex post facto design. Data were collected from a census of 118 teachers using structured questionnaires. The analysis utilized multiple linear regression via SPSS version 26.0. The results indicate that leadership (sig = 0.000) and organizational culture (sig = 0.000) significantly improve teacher performance. Conversely, work motivation does not show a significant independent effect (sig = 0.098). Collectively, these variables account for 51% of the performance variance. The study concludes that systemic external factors currently overshadow internal motivation in driving teacher performance. Future studies should incorporate qualitative methods, such as interviews, and expand the geographical scope to validate these findings across different cultural and demographic contexts.

Keywords

leadership, organizational culture

Downloads

References

1. Adeyemi, T. O. (2016). Principals' leadership styles and teachers' job performance in senior secondaryschools. Journal of Economic Theory, 3(3), 84-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of transformational leadership andmotivation on performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), 19-29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2006). Performance Management: The New Realities. London: CIPD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bangun, D. (2012). Hubungan pemberdayaan guru dan motivasi kerja dengan kinerja guru profesional.Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 33(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fahmi, I. (2017). Pengantar ilmu kepemimpinan. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hamzah, U. (2017). Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Luthans, F. (2012). Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mangkunegara, A. A. P. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mulyasa, E. (2015). Prinsip-prinsip dan teknik evaluasi pengajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ndraha, T. (2003). Budaya Organisasi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Rivai, V., & Sagala, E. J. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan. Jakarta: PT Rajawali Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Robbins, S. P. (2006). Perilaku organisasi. Jakarta: Indeks. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Organizational Behavior. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sutrisno, E. (2019). Budaya Organisasi. Jakarta: Prenada Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Syakir, M. J., & Pardjono, P. (2015). Pengaruh kepemimpinan kepala sekolah terhadap kompetensi guru.Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Yukl, G. (2005). Kepemimpinan dalam organisasi. Jakarta: Indeks. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles