The Influence of Membership Diversity on Performance of CBO projects in Kaptembwo Informal settlement area in Nakuru city

Authors

Nyasani Sylivia

Department of Peace, Security and Social Studies, Egerton University (Kenya)

Hadija Murenga

Department of Peace, Security and Social Studies, Egerton University (Kenya)

Dr. Samuel Osike

Department of Peace, Security and Social Studies, Egerton University (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800267

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 4024-4046

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-05

Accepted: 2026-08-10

Published: 2026-09-01

Abstract

Membership diversity continues to be recognized as a critical determinant of the effectiveness of community-based organizations (CBOs), especially in informal urban settlements where collective action is a key pillar for community development. Nonetheless, evidence on how diversity influences the performance of CBO-supported projects remains underexplored. This study examined how membership diversity influenced performance of CBO-supported projects in Kaptembwo informal settlement, Nakuru City, Kenya. The theoretical and methodological basis for this study was Social Capital Theory and a mixed methods approach using a concurrent triangulation research design. The findings reported in this paper are drawn from a broader study on the influence of social capital on the performance of CBO-supported projects. A sample of 152 CBO members was selected through simple random sampling, while seven key informants, including CBO leaders, local administrators, and a Social Development Officer, were selected purposively. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used in analyzing quantitative data, while themes were used for qualitative data. The study found that membership diversity significantly influences project performance by enhancing innovation, knowledge sharing, inclusivity, as well as collective problem-solving. Diversity enabled CBOs to draw on multidimensional experiences, skills, and perspectives, thus improving decision-making and responsiveness to community needs. Conversely, diversity also presented challenges, such as interpersonal conflicts, communication barriers, unequal participation, as well as power imbalances that limited effective project implementation in the absence of adequate management. The study also found that female-dominated participation contributed more positively to project performance compared to gender-balanced representation, implying that active participation and commitment may be more influential compared numerical gender parity. The study concludes that membership diversity contributes positively to the performance of CBO-supported projects if supported by inclusive leadership, proper communication, and effective conflict management strategies. This study recommends strengthening inclusive governance structures, promotion of equitable participation, and institutionalization of conflict resolution practices to lavarage the benefits of membership diversity in community-based development projects.

Keywords

Membership diversity, Performance of CBO-supported projects, Social Capital Theory, Informal Urban Settlements

Downloads

References

1. Assembly, G. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. In SDGs transform our world (pp. 6–28). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asvaroğlu, E., & Asvaroğlu, F. (2022). The benefits and disadvantages of diversity management in education. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 12(2), 172–177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234.https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Campbell, C., Trotter, L., & O’Rourke, T. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–666. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. City Population. (n.d.). Nakuru West Subcounty. https://www.citypopulation.de/en/kenya/sub/admin/nakuru/3208__nakuru_west/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fraser, T., & Naquin, N. (2022). Better together? The role of social capital in urban social vulnerability. Habitat International, 124, 102561. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hettne, B., & Soderbaum, F. (2006). The UN and regional organizations in global security: Competing or complementary logics? Global Governance, 12, 227–248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Karuga, R., Kabaria, C., Chumo, I., Okoth, L., Njoroge, I., Otiso, L., Muturi, N., Karki, J., Dean, L., Tolhurst, R., & Steege, R. (2023). Voices and challenges of marginalized and vulnerable groups in urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya: Building on a spectrum of community-based participatory research approaches. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1175326. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1175326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Masud-All-Kamal, M., Nursey-Bray, M., & Hassan, S. M. (2021). Challenges to building social capital through planned adaptation: Evidence from rural communities in Bangladesh. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 100091. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Matelski, M., & Woensdregt, L. (2024). What’s (in) a CBO? Analyzing community representation in the Kenyan aid chain. Community Development Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsae024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mutenje, C. (2017). The factors influencing the effectiveness of community-based organisations (CBOs) in project implementation in Zambia (Case study of Kasama District) (Doctoral dissertation). Information and Communications University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mwangi, J. K., & Wambugu, S. (2019). The effect of membership diversity on the performance of community- based organizations in rural Kenya. International Journal of Community Development, 7(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijcd.v7i2.5678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. NASA JPL. (2013). NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Global 1 arc second [Data set]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. https://doi.org/10.5067/MEaSUREs/SRTM/SRTMGL1.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (8th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Prince, E. (2024). Role of social capital in community development. Journal of Advanced Sociology, 5(2), 55– 68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Squires, V. (2023). Thematic analysis. In Varieties of qualitative research methods: Selected contextual perspectives (pp. 463–468). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research design and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Siisiainen, M. (2003). Two concepts of social capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 40(2), 183–204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Soma, H., Sukhwani, V., & Shaw, R. (2022). An approach to determining the linkage between livelihood assets and the housing conditions in urban Informal settlement area of Dhaka. Journal of Urban Management, 11(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2021.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Song, J. H. (2016). The effect of social capital on organizational performance in different cultures: A cross- national comparison of the United States and South Korea [Doctoral dissertation, Florida International University]. FIU Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/2450 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tsounis, A., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2024). Social capital theory: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed.), TheoryHub Book. https://open.ncl.ac.uk (ISBN: 9781739604400) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Yayeh, F. A., & Demissie, W. M. (2024). Social capital and poverty reduction in Ethiopia: Evidence from the Amhara Region. African Journal of Commercial Studies, 4(4), 289–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles