The Influence of Organic Interior Geometry on Psychological Comfort and Spatial Experience
Authors
Student, School of Interior Design, AAFT University of Media and Arts (India)
Head of Department, School of Interior Design, AAFT University of Media and Arts (India)
Assistant Professor, School of Interior Design, AAFT University of Media and Arts (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1305000271
Subject Category: psycology
Volume/Issue: 13/5 | Page No: 3141-3148
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-20
Accepted: 2026-05-25
Published: 2026-06-15
Abstract
The Human mind, body and soul is affected by indoor environments. Organic geometry in detail contemporary interior design and space planning application is now able to utilize organic geometry as a powerful means to the end of achieving spatial psychology and space synergy concepts in its space planning and interior design solutions. Organic forms in nature exhibit curves fluid lines, biomorphic patterns and spatial transitions smooth that are very different to stiff rectilinear forms such features contribute to the making of interior which look visually pleasing and soothing to the eye and is centered on a human scale .
Keywords
Organic geometry, psychological comfort, spatial experience, interior design
Downloads
References
1. Interior Design Illustrated Ching, F. D. K. (2014). Interior design illustrated (4th ed.). Wiley. Wiley Reference [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. The Eyes of the Skin Pallasmaa, J. (2012). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses (3rd ed.). Wiley. Book Source [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Biophilia Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press. Harvard University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. The Biophilia Hypothesis Kellert, S., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press.mIsland Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Nature by Design Kellert, S. (2018). Nature by design: The practice of biophilic design. Yale University Press. Yale University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Browning, W., Ryan, C., & Clancy, J. (2014). 14 patterns of biophilic design. Terrapin Bright Green. Terrapin Bright Green [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Joye, Y. (2007). Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: The case of biophilic architecture. Review of General Psychology, 11(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089- 2680.11.4.305 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ryan, C. O., Browning, W. D., Clancy, J. O., Andrews, S. L., & Kallianpurkar, N. B. (2014). Biophilic design patterns. Terrapin Bright Green LLC, 2, 16–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Zumthor, P. (2006). Atmospheres: Architectural environments surrounding objects. Birkhäuser. Birkhäuser [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hadid, Z. (2013). Organic architecture and fluid spatial design. Architectural Review Journal, 45(3), 52–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Salingaros, N. (2015). Biophilia and healing environments. Terrapin Bright Green. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Gaekwad, J. S., Moslehian, A. S., Roös, P. B., & Walker, A. (2022). A meta-analysis of emotional evidence for the biophilia hypothesis and implications for biophilic design. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Gillis, K., & Gatersleben, B. (2015). A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings, 5(3), 948–963. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Söderlund, J., & Newman, P. (2015). Biophilic architecture: A review of the rationale and outcomes. AIMS Environmental Science, 2(4), 950–969. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Joye, Y., & van den Berg, A. (2011). Is love for green in our genes? A critical analysis of evolutionary assumptions in restorative environments research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(4), 261–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Heerwagen, J. (2008). Biophilia, health, and wellbeing. In S. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, & M. Mador (Eds.), Biophilic design: The theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life (pp. 227– 241). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kellert, S., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. Wiley. Wiley Biophilic Design [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Peters, T., & D’Penna, K. (2020). Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments. Journal of Facilities Management, 18(1), 66–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mangone, G., & van der Ryn, S. (2014). Design for life: Biophilic architecture for a resilientworld. Gibbs Smith. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Abbaszadeh, S., Zagreus, L., Lehrer, D., & Huizenga, C. (2006). Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in green buildings. Proceedings of Healthy Buildings, 3, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]