The Influence of Social Support for Online Learning Motivation

Online learning continues to expand due to its accessibility and flexibility; however, sustaining learners’ motivation in digital environments remains a challenge. This study aims to investigate the influence of social support on learners’ motivation to learn online, alongside the roles of expectancy and value. A quantitative survey design was employed, involving 255 respondents from two Malaysian public universities representing the Science & Technology and Social Sciences & Humanities clusters. The instrument consisted of 37 items adapted from Vroom’s Expectancy Theory (1964) and Fowler’s Motivation to Learn Online Questionnaire (2018), and demonstrated strong reliability (overall Cronbach’s α = .937). Findings show that learners perceived high levels of instructor support, strong task value, and strong control of learning beliefs, although their self‑efficacy and social engagement varied depending on task complexity and online interaction. Correlation analyses revealed strong positive relationships among expectancy, value, and social support, indicating that online learning motivation is shaped collectively by cognitive beliefs and interpersonal support. No significant differences were found across universities or clusters. The study highlights the importance of emotional, instructional, and peer‑based support in fostering a more engaging and motivating online learning experience.

Online Learning, Motivation, Social Support, Expectancy

1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024) Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-Learning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amir, N., Sukimin, I. S., Radzi, S. F. M., Zolkapli, R. B. M., Soopar, A. A., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). A Study of Relationship between Instrumentality, Expectancy and Value for Learning Motivation among Undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(9), 1215–1233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Fowler,S. (2018) The Motivation to learn Online Questionnaire. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation. Graduate Faculty, The University of Georgia. Retrieved from https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/fowler_kevin_s_201805_phd.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study if Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lokman, A., Hassan, F., Ustadi, Y. A., Rahman, F. A. A., Zain, Z. M., & Rahmat, N. H. (2022). Investigating motivation for learning via Vroom’s theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(1), 504–530. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i1/11749 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mok, S. S., Tan, S. L., Tai, Y. J., Chen, Z., & Rahmat, N. H. (2025). Motivation to learn online: An overview of students’ perceptions. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(22), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.922ILEIID0036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Rahmat, N.H. (2025) Students’ preference for Types of Online Engagement. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling (IJEPC), 10(58) , 665—678 https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1058044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Vetter, T.R. (2017) Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When , Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesth Analg, 12595), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Vo, H., & Ho, H. (2024). Online learning environment and student engagement: The mediating role of expectancy and task value beliefs. Australian Educational Researcher, 51, 2183–2207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00689-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Vroom, V. (1964) Work and Motivation. Wiley and Sons, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Zahid, A. Z. M., Kamaruddin, S. F., Saifullizam, N. Z., Noh, N., Ismail, H. B., & Kassim, J. (2024). The influence of value, social support and expectancy in online learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(7), 918–937. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i7/21940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C.. (202) Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study