The Influence of Strategic Monitoring and Evaluation on Performance of County Pension Fund, Kenya
Authors
Department of Commerce, School of Business and Economics, Daystar University (Kenya)
Department of Human Resource Development, School of Business, Karatina University (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500610
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 9099-9109
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-08
Accepted: 2026-05-13
Published: 2026-06-09
Abstract
County Pension Fund (CPF) plays a critical role in ensuring that retirement benefits for public servants are secure. Strategic Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is essential for enhancing organizational accountability yet there is limited evidence on how M&E practices influence the performance of CPF in Kenya. The funds performance is still wanting in terms of return on investment, operational inefficiency and delayed disbursement of benefits to members. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the influence of strategic monitoring and evaluation on the performance of CPF in Kenya. The study was anchored on Stakeholder theory and adopted a descriptive research design. The target population was all 452 pension fund employees. Yamane’s formula was used to compute a sample of 212 respondents. Primary data was collected using a structured questionnaire. Data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The study established that strategic monitoring and evaluation had a statistically significant influence on the performance of the CPF in Kenya (R2 0.653; p-value 0.001). The study recommended that strategic monitoring and evaluation should use predictive analytics, independent reviews, continuous feedback, and stakeholder consultations to enhance accountability, innovation, alignment with beneficiaries’ needs. This will enhance the achievement of SDGs that focus on strong institutions.
Keywords
Strategic Monitoring, Evaluation, Performance, Pension Fund
Downloads
References
1. Abbas, J., & Kumari, K. (2023). Examining the relationship between total quality management and knowledge management and their impact on organizational performance: A dimensional analysis. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 39(2), 426-451.https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-03-2021-0046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Castillo, J. J. (2009). Research population. Retrieved from https://explorable.com/research-population. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chepngetich, J., & Kyule, J. (2024). The influence of monitoring and evaluation imperatives on the performance of the Kenya Revenue Authority. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 12(1), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chivandire, L. (2023). Navigating Pension Fund Trusteeship: A Comprehensive Overview of Trustees' Obligations in Zimbabwe. Available at SSRN 4406679. DOI: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. 2139/ssrn.4406679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. CPF. (2023). Annual report 2023. Nairobi, Kenya [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Donald, M. S. (2022). Modern Challenges to the Prudence Expected of Pension Fund Trustees. King's Law Journal, 33(1), 92-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2022.2034593 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Freeman, E., (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ghauri, P., & Grønhaug, K. (2020). Research methods in business studies (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariete dengan program (IBM. SPSS). Univrsitas Dipenogoro. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Government of Kenya. (2010). The Constitution of Kenya. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Harty, H. P. (2014). Performance measurement: Getting results (2nd ed.). Urban Institute Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hill, C. W. L., Jones, G. R., & Schilling, M. A. (2024). Strategic management: Theory: An integrated approach (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Kili, H. (2024). County Pension Fund Demonstrates Strong Financial Performance Amid Economic Challenges. Kenyatta University TV. Retrieved from https://kutv.co.ke/county-pension-fund-demonstrates-strong-financial-performance amid economic challenges/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Kimathi, G. J. F. M., & Kathula, D. (2022). Management functions on the performance of retirement benefits schemes in Kenya. International Academic Journal of Human Resource and Business Administration, 4(1), 448-465. http://iajournals.org/articles/iajhrba_v4_i1_448_465.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Kothari, C. R. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (3rd ed.). New Age International Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Mackay, K. (2007). How to build M&E systems to support better government. Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6646 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. OECD. (2010). Evaluating public sector efficiency: A practical guide for governments and auditors. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Retirement Benefits Authority. (2022). Retirement benefits governance and regulatory guidelines. Nairobi, Kenya [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Wambile, M. C., & Munene, R. W. (2024). Influence of corporate response strategies on performance of County Pension Fund, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Innovation, Leadership and Entrepreneurship, 2 (4), 167-183. https://iajournals.org/articles/iajile_v2_i4_167_183.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria