The Influence of Teachers’ Computer Competencies on E-Learning Engagement of College Students

This study explored how teachers’ computer competencies influence the e-learning engagement of college students in Santo Tomas, Davao del Norte. A quantitative descriptive-correlational design was used, involving 359 college students selected through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using adapted survey questionnaires measuring teachers’ computer competencies and students’ e-learning engagement. Results showed that teachers’ computer competencies were high, and students also demonstrated a high level of engagement in online learning, which means oftentimes observed. Statistical analysis revealed a strong and significant relationship between teachers’ computer competencies and students’ e-learning engagement. These findings suggest that when teachers are more competent in using technology, students become more active, motivated, and engaged in e-learning. The study highlights the importance of strengthening teachers’ digital skills to enhance the quality of online learning in higher education.

Teachers’ computer competencies; E-learning engagement; Online learning

1. Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). “I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?”: ICT in Ghana post Covid-19. Education and information technologies, 26(2), 1665-1685. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akpen, C. N., Asaolu, S., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H., & Sampson, S. (2024). Impact of online learning on students’ performance and engagement: A systematic review. Discover Education, 3, Article 205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alayande, B. T., Riviello, R. R., & Bekele, A. (2023). How to maintain ethical standards of global surgery practice and partnerships. In Global Surgery: How to Work and Teach in Low-and Middle-Income Countries (pp. 21-37). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alsaqr, A. M. (2021). Remarks on the use of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients in assessing relationships in ophthalmic data. African Vision and Eye Health, 80(1), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baloran, E. T., Hernan, J. T., & Taoy, J. S. (2021). Course satisfaction and student engagement in online learning amid COVID-19 pandemic. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(4), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28), 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L. A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 19(1), 8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bautista-Garrido, J. (2024). Research Integrity: The Need for a Research Misconduct Definition Within a Global Scope (Doctoral dissertation). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bilocura, E. B., Adlaon, M. S., & Cuyag, R. M. O. (2023). E-Learning Engagements of Pre-Service Education Students. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 7(4), 514-530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2010). Understanding nursing research-eBook: Building an evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chen, J., & Zhang, L. (2024). The role of cognitive engagement in promoting critical thinking and deep learning in e-learning platforms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Continu. (2025). E-learning engagement refers to the level of involvement, interaction, and active participation of learners in online learning experiences. Retrieved from https://www.continu.com/elearning-glossary/elearning-engagement [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of educational technology systems, 49(1), 5-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Garzón-Artacho, E., Sola-Martínez, T., Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., & Gómez-García, G. (2021). Teachers' perceptions of digital competence at the lifelong learning stage. Heliyon, 7(7). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ghanad, A. (2023b). An overview of quantitative research methods. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS, 06(08. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Grant, S. C. (2021). Informed consent—we can and should do better. JAMA network open, 4(4), e2110848-e2110848. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hayes, A. (2023). How stratified random sampling works, with examples. Financial Analysis, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. He, J., Wang, Q., & Lee, H. (2025). Enhancing online learning engagement: teacher support, psychological needs satisfaction and interaction. BMC psychology, 13(1), 696. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hernández-Mustieles, M. A., Lima-Carmona, Y. E., Pacheco-Ramírez, M. A., Mendoza-Armenta, A. A., Romero-Gómez, J. E., Cruz-Gómez, C. F., ... & Lozoya-Santos, J. D. J. (2024). Wearable biosensor technology in education: A systematic review. Sensors, 24(8), 2437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Howard, S. K., & Tondeur, J. (2023). Higher education teachers' digital competencies for a blended future. Educational technology research and development, 71(1), 1-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hurley, M., & Tenny, S. (2023). Mean. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. HWANG, H. J. (2023). The importance of anonymity and confidentiality for conducting survey research. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 4(1), 1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hanaysha, R., Shriedeh, F., Mohammad I. Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance, International Journal of Information Management Data Insights. Volume 3, Issue 2, 2023, 100188, ISSN 2667-0968. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kaye, D. K. (2021). Motivation to participate and experiences of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in emergency obstetric care in Uganda. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1), 104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kölemen, C. Ş. (2023). Self-efficacy perception of education faculty members on technology integration. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 7(14), 393-406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European journal of teacher education, 43(4), 608-622. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Laed, K. (2021). Pearson product-moment correlation. Retrieved on 1st November. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lee, S., Kim, J., & Park, H. (2022). E-learning engagement and student satisfaction in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 54, 100839. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lee, S., Kim, J., & Park, H. (2022). E-learning engagement and student satisfaction in higher education: A meta-analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 54, 100839. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Llego, I. (2024). Digital competence and work-life balance on teaching effectiveness of long-serving basic education teachers. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Luo, X., Chen, Y., & Wang, J. (2025). The impact of teachers’ computer competencies on e-learning engagement among college students. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 15(2), 123-137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mbatha, D., & Motala, S. (2021). Lecturers’ perspectives on online teaching in a digital environment at a South African university. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(4), 408–415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mijares, B. (2022). Teachers’ Information and Communication Technology Competencies: Basis for a Competency-based Training Plan. Available at SSRN 4241635. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Monserate, C. A. (2018). Impact of technology on the academic performance of students and teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations, 6(1), 47-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nagadeepa, C., Mohan, R., & Raji, S. (2021). Connecting With Students: Cognitive Engagement In E-Classrooms. Elementary Education Online, 20(6), 1114-1114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Nawi, S. M., Yusof, S. M., Kamaludin, P. N. H., & Sain, N. (2021). Exploring Malaysian tertiary students’ behavioural, cognitive, emotional and social engagement and disengagement in ODL. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 1296-1311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Panjaitan, A. O., Novelyn, S., & Angreni, F. (2024). The impact of proper citation on academic integrity and scholarship. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 18(10), 192-201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (2008). The psychology of the child. Basic books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Pratama, F. R., Santoso, H. B., Junus, K., Michael, J., & Athaya, H. (2025). Constructivism in Online and Hybrid Learning Before and After COVID-19: A Systematic Literature Review. JURNAL EDUSCIENCE, 12(4), 1111-1129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Resnik, D. B. (2015, January). What is ethics in research & why is it important. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Salimi, G., Karimi, A., & Heidari, E. (2025). Online engagement of students: investigating the drivers of online teaching competencies and innovative teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(5), 3380-3392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., & Tondeur, J. (2021). Teacher digital competence: A systematic review of conceptualizations and measurement. Computers & Education, 170, 104223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Song, Y., Lv, S., Wang, M., Wang, Z., & Dong, W. (2025). The Impact of Digital Learning Competence on the Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Students. Behavioral Sciences, 15(7), 840. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Sreekumar, D. (2025, July 23). What is Correlational Research: Definition, Types, and Examples | Researcher.Life. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Stanat, R. (2025, September 17). What is Quantitative Research? | SIS International Research. SIS International Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Stewart, L. (2025, February 26). Correlational Research | Definition, Methods & Applications. ATLAS.ti. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Unesco, I. C. T. (2011). Competency framework for teachers. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Chen, H. (2023). Behavioral engagement as a predictor of academic achievement in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 192, 104653. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Yong-Hong, W. A. N. G., & Xiang-Chun, H. E. (2021, November). Research on the Application of College Students’ Online Learning Cognitive Engagement Evaluation. In International Conference on Computers in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Yulin, N., & Danso, S. D. (2025). Assessing Pedagogical Readiness for Digital Innovation: A Mixed-Methods Study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.15781. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study