The Influence of Vocabulary Knowledge, Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Parental Involvement on Grade 7 Students’ Reading Comprehension

Reading comprehension was a foundational skill that was key to academic success, however many students in Grade 7 had difficulty as texts became more challenging. Grounded in the Simple View of Reading and Scaffolding Theory, the study investigated the relationship between vocabulary knowledge, teachers’ instructional practices, parental involvement and reading comprehension of Grade 7 students from one district of Cagayan de Oro City. It specifically examined vocabulary knowledge, teachers’ instructional practices, parental involvement and reading comprehension in four subskills: extracting significant information, distinguishing fact from opinion, drawing inferences and analyzing real-world issues. The study used a descriptive–correlational design with 214 students who were selected using simple random sampling. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, correlation and multiple regression analysis. The results indicated that vocabulary knowledge, teacher’s instructional practices and parental involvement were all at high levels. The regression model was significant; however, vocabulary knowledge was the only significant predictor of reading comprehension. Students performed relatively well in drawing inferences and analyzing real-world issues but experienced difficulty in distinguishing fact from opinion. These findings underscore the role of vocabulary knowledge in enhancing reading comprehension and the need for supportive teaching and home environments. Overall, this underscores that while external support is valuable, building strong vocabulary remains the foundational factor for effective reading comprehension. Future researchers are encouraged to examine additional factors influencing reading comprehension, such as reading motivation, metacognitive strategies, and digital literacy, to extend the generalizability of the findings across diverse contexts.

Influence, Parental Involvement, Reading Comprehension, Teachers’ Instructional Practices, Vocabulary Knowledge

1. Alzahrani, M. A., & Almalki, S. M. (2025). An exploration of teaching reading practice and pedagogical knowledge in secondary schools. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1483754 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ando, E., Plando, D., Opingo, K. M., & Mangubat, R. (2024). The influence of parental involvement on reading comprehension in Grade Three learners (Philippines). Research and Innovative Social Science (RISS) / Academia Insight. https://academiainsight.com/index.php/riss/article/download/474/243/549 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arcilla, F. N. (2024). Parental involvement and individual reading level of Grade 4 students. In Proceedings of De La Salle University Research Congress 2024 (LLI-18). https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/conferences/research-congress-proceedings/2024/LLI-18.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Boonk, L., Gijselaers, H. J. M., Ritzen, H., & Brand Gruwel, S. (2024). The interplay between students’ home literacy environment, reading attitudes and comprehension: A serial mediation analysis using PIRLS 2021 data. Large scale Assessments in Education, 12, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-024-00233-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Caban, N., Velayo, J., Tampus, G. J., Padillo, G., & Etcuban, J. (2024). Parental involvement in reading among Grade 1 learners. British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy, 3(3), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjtep.2024.3.3.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cabuyao, M. R., & Velasco, J. P. (2025). Event-semantic extraction technique for enhancing informational reading comprehension. International Journal of Social Science, Humanities and Management Research, 4(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2025.v4i6n06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cabuyao, M. R., & Velasco, J. P. (2025). Event-semantic extraction technique for enhancing informational reading comprehension. International Journal of Social Science, Humanities and Management Research, 4(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2025.v4i6n06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dagnaw, A. T. (2023). Revisiting the role of breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2217345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2217345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. De Ocampo, L. L., & Tosino, W. F. (2024). Teachers’ reading comprehension strategies, approaches and challenges in Iloilo schools. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 7(3), 107–130. https://ijsmsjournal.org/2024/volume-7%20issue-3/ijsms-v7i3p107.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dong, Y., Tang, Y., Chow, B. W.-Y., Wang, W., & Dong, W.-Y. (2020). Contribution of vocabulary knowledge to reading comprehension among Chinese students: A meta- analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 525369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.525369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Freed, J., & Cain, K. (2021). Assessment of inference-making in children using comprehension questions and story retelling: Effect of text modality and story presentation format. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 56(3), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gallagher, M. A., Beck, J. S., Ramirez, E. M., Taboada Barber, A., & Buehl, M. M. (2023). Supporting multilingual learners’ reading competence: A multiple case study of teachers’ instruction and student learning and motivation. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1085909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Masrul, M., & Wicaksono, B. H. (2023). The impact of explicit instruction on teaching vocabulary to fourth grade students. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 6(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v6i2.2048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023, December 5). PISA 2022 results (Volume I & II): Country note Philippines. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pada, J. R. S. (2024). Impact of parental involvement on students’ reading proficiency. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(7), 901–910. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=23990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Paige, D., Rupley, W. H., & Ziglari, L. (2024). Critical Thinking in Reading Comprehension: Fine Tuning the Simple View of Reading. Education Sciences, 14(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Park, Y., & Waxman, S. R. (2023). Understanding the role of academic vocabulary in content acquisition for middle school students with and without disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 57(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669221097944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tran, A. H., Tremblay, K. A., & Binder, K. S. (2020). The factor structure of vocabulary: An investigation of breadth and depth of adults with low literacy skills. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(2), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09694-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wright, T. S., Bruner, L., Cummings, A. C., & Strunk, K. O. (2024). Understanding K–3 teachers’ literacy instructional practices during the pandemic-impacted 2020-2021 school year. Reading Research Quarterly. https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/rrq.523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Yopo, M. (2024). A study on the relationship between parental involvement and reading performance of Grade VI students in Pajo Elementary School, Tarangan, Samar. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(9), 3502-3506. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.09.09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zeng, Y., Kuo, L. J., Chen, L., Lin, J. A., & Shen, H. (2025). Vocabulary instruction for English learners: A systematic review connecting theories, research, and practices. Educ. Sci., 15(3), 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Enhancing English Vocabulary Skills for Grade 9 Students ‘Using Deal or No Deal’ Game
• Enhancing Grade 8 English Engagement: Fill My Bag Strategy
• Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers’ Communication Competence: An Input to a Communication Skills Development Module
• Lower Secondary School Students' Attitude toward Reading in English
• Learner Autonomy and Attitudes toward Philippine English: Predictors of Grammar Performance among College ESL Students