The Interplay of Idiosyncratic Deals and Social Exchange in Quality Employment: The Role of Autonomy Need Satisfaction
Authors
Department of Management, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, South China Business College, Guangzhou (China)
Department of Economic Management, Hebei Vocational College of Labour Relations, Shijiazhuang (China)
Department of Economic Management, Hebei Normal University, Huihua College, Shijiazhuang (China)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100474
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 6111-6121
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-23
Accepted: 2026-01-28
Published: 2026-02-13
Abstract
Idiosyncratic deals (i - deals) have been conceptually and empirically linked to work - related outcomes among employees. However, when and how i - deals impact intern students’ employment quality remains unclear. Drawing from self - determination theory, we investigated the influence of i - deals on two distinct employment quality outcomes: proactive work behavior and job burnout, and explored the mediating role of autonomy need satisfaction in these relationships. In addition, from the perspective of social exchange, we also hypothesized that i - deals stimulate proactive work behavior when students report a higher level of social exchange action and experience more job burnout when they show fewer exchange behaviors. Using a cross - sectional study, we surveyed 369 Chinese intern students from 15 vocational and technical education institutions using a cluster random sampling technique. Structural equation modelling and hierarchical regression analysis were used to analyze the data. The study revealed that autonomy need satisfaction mediated the relationships between i - deals and proactive work behavior as well as job burnout. In addition, social exchange was also found to be a significant moderator of the relationship between i - deals and job burnout rather than proactive work behavior. Specifically, the negative effect of i - deals on burnout was weakened as social exchange increased. Contributions and implications were discussed.
Keywords
idiosyncratic deals, job burnout, proactive work behavior, social exchange
Downloads
References
1. Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1015921. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anand, S., & Mitra, A. (2022). No family left behind: Flexibility i-deals for employees with stigmatized family identities. Human Relations, 75(5), 956–988. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Anand, S., & Rofcanin, Y. (2022). I-deals and the future of work: A research agenda for the post-pandemic age. In Idiosyncratic deals at work: Exploring individual, organizational, and societal perspectives (pp. 309–333). Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2011). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 2. Selecting and developing members for the organization (pp. 567–598). American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Blokker, R., Akkermans, J., Marciniak, J., Jansen, P. G., & Khapova, S. N. (2023). Organizing school-to-work transition research from a sustainable career perspective: A review and research agenda. Work, Aging and Retirement, 9(3), 239-261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A.Bollen, & Long, J. S. (Eds), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Congna, H., & Saad, N. (2025). The impact of human capital on employment quality: a scoping review. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2552352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Feng, Z., Wang, Q., & Liu, N. (Eds.). (2025). Education in China and the world: National development and global benchmarking. Springer Nature Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Guo, W., Hancock, J., Cooper, D., & Caldas, M. (2023). Job autonomy and employee burnout: the moderating role of power distance orientation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 32(1), 79-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kleine, A. K., Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2019). Thriving at work: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(9-10), 973-999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Hasselgren Bune, C., & Jonsson, R. (2024). The role of idiosyncratic deals in shaping retirement preferences of older workers: A psychological needs perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, 72(4), 310-327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., & Glaser, J. (2008). Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 655–664. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Jankelova, N., Dabić, M., & Halaszovich, T. (2025). Organizational climate: citizenship behavior, idiosyncratic deals and leader–member exchange. Management Decision, 63(13), 600-630. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z., Erdogan, B., Caughlin, D. E., & Bauer, T. N. (2024). Transformational leadership, idiosyncratic deals and employee outcomes. Personnel Review, 53(2), 562-579. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: a self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Lai, L., Rousseau, D. M., & Chang, K. T. T. (2009). Idiosyncratic deals: Coworkers as interested third parties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 547–556. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Li, C., & Shi. K. (2003). The influence of distributive justice and procedural justice on job burnout. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(05), 677. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Li, H. N., & Kong, M. (2021). How and when do leader-member exchanges affect employee deviant behaviour? A social control theory perspective. China Human Resource Development, 38(03):6-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Li, Y., You, H., & Oh, S. (2024). A study on the structural relationship between emotional labor, job burnout, and turnover intention among office workers in Korea: the moderated mediating effect of leader-member exchange. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Liao, C., Wayne, S. J., & Rousseau, D. M. (2016). Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta‐analytical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, S9-S29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Liu, S., & Hardy, I. (2023). Understanding Chinese national vocational education reform: a critical policy analysis. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 75(5), 1055-1077. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Lubbadeh, T. (2020). Job burnout: A general literature review. International Review of Management and Marketing, 10(3), 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Luo P, Shi Jq, Zhu Yn, Fang Yan. (2020). The effects of personalised work agreements on employees' proactive work behaviour and creativity[J]. Journal of Psychology, 52(01):81-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. MyCOS. (2025). 2025 China Vocational College Students Employment Report. Social Sciences Academic Press (China) . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Ng, T. W., & Lucianetti, L. (2016). Goal striving, idiosyncratic deals, and job behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 41–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Pratama, A. S., Sridadi, A. R., Eliyana, A., Anggraini, R. D., & Kamil, N. L. M. (2023). A systematic Review of proactive work behavior: Future research recommendation. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 18(2), 136-151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Rousseau, D. (2015). I-deals: Idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Schutte, N., Toppinen, S., Kalimo, R., & Schaufeli, W. (2000). The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory‐General Survey (MBI‐GS) across occupational groups and nations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(1), 53-66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Singh, S., & Vidyarthi, P. R. (2018). Idiosyncratic deals to employee outcomes: Mediating role of social exchange relationships. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(4), 443-455. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Strauss, K., Griffin, M. A., & Parker, S. K. (2012). Future work selves: How salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 580-598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195-1229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Yang, C., Bao, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2024). More autonomy, more proactive? The (in) congruence effects of autonomy on proactive behaviour. Management Decision, 62(5), 1560-1575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Sun, N., Liang, S., Li, H., & Song, H. (2023). Ex post i-deals, work-life balance, and work well-being in the hospitality industry: the moderating role of gender. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(9), 3077-3094. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Zhang, B., Mathai, M., & Li, J. (2025). Balancing flexibility i‐deals and job insecurity: How coordination flexibility i‐deals affect employee well‐being and burnout. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 98(4), e70072. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria