The Isnag Lapat System: Cultural Narratives And Indigenous Practices For Environmental Preservation

Indigenous knowledge systems and practices (IKSP) remain an influential factor to how communities take care of their environment and maintain their culture. The Lapat System is one of the traditional practices of the Isnag people of Pudtol, Apayao, which governs the use of natural resources together with reinforcing the values of the community. Nevertheless, with modernization and social developments, passing such indigenous practices to the younger generations has become an issue of concern. This research investigates the Isnag Lapat System in Pudtol, Apayao, and discovers that it is a culturally appropriate, TEK-based system for managing natural resources that use culturally ingrained beliefs and restrictions to suggest the process of nature's regeneration and social cohesion. The findings underscore the importance for conservation of indigenous knowledge systems as a basis for sustainable environmental management and continuity of Indigenous cultures and traditions.The qualitative narrative method was taken and data were collected by semi structured interviews with the chosen community leaders and elders as well as culture bearers having knowledge about Lapat tradition. The stories gathered were analyzed through thematic analysis in order to find out the common notions and meanings that were common among the participants. It was found that the Lapat System is highly related to the ethical system termed Supdina which is informed by the concept of Annaw, Aliyaw and Ngilin. These values define the relationships between people, the society, and nature. It was also revealed that Lapat assists in the preservation of natural resources since it provides a temporary limitation of forests, rivers, and other spaces to enable the regeneration of the ecology. Besides that, the practice enhances social cohesion through the strengthening of values like respect, responsibility, cooperation, and harmony in the community. The paper provides a spotlight on the importance of recording and safeguarding indigenous knowledge systems as valuable pillars towards sustainable environmental management as well as in cultural heritage protection.

Apayao; environmental preservation; indigenous knowledge; Isnag culture; Lapat System

1. Berkes, F. (2017). Sacred ecology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123843 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Camacho, L. D., Combalicer, E. A., Carandang, A. P., Camacho, S. C., Combalicer, M. S., de Luna, C. C., Rebugio, L. L., & Pulhin, J. M. (2015). Traditional forest conservation knowledge and practices of indigenous peoples in the Philippines. Forest Policy and Economics, 54, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.01.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (2021). Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio, 50(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01306-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hill, R., Walsh, F., & Davies, J. (2020). Indigenous knowledge and environmental Management. Global Environmental Change, 63, 102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Macusi, E. D. (2023). Indigenous ecological knowledge and environmental stewardship. Environmental Development, 46, 100825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100825 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Paing, M. T., Galino, A. B., & Anongos, K. G. (2025). Indigenous knowledge systems and biodiversity conservation in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 14(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Philippine News Agency. (2024). Apayao remains one of the most forest-covered provinces in the Philippines. https://www.pna.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Reed, M. G., & Abernethy, P. (2023). Indigenous stewardship and community-based conservation.Conservation Science and Practice, 5(4), e1271. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.1271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sadao, M. N. (2010). The Lapat system: Indigenous forest conservation practices in Apayao. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Torres, M. A. (2020). Indigenous peoples and environmental stewardship in the Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 51(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463420000185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Indigenous peoples and biodiversity conservation in the Philippines. https://www.undp.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. UNESCO. (2024). Indigenous knowledge and sustainable environmental management. https://www.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Whyte, K. (2021). Indigenous science and environmental justice. Environment and Society, 12(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2021.120106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Influence of Korean Drama to Cultural Identity of Students in One Private School
• Children’s Vulnerability in Coastal Slums during Cyclone: A Case Study of Puri Municipality Area
• Mitigating Youth Restiveness Through Social Studies Education: Implications for Institutional Stability, Civic Responsibility, and Student Empowerment in Nigeria
• Students’ Awareness of Sexual Harassment Forms at Campus II, University of Labor and Social Affairs
• Influence of Social Studies Curriculum Content on Youth Restiveness and Civic Responsibility Among Secondary School Students in Nigeria