The Knowledge, Awareness and Practice on Molecular Biology among Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Students Across Peninsular Malaysia.

This study aimed to assess the knowledge, awareness, and practice (KAP) of molecular biology among 154 undergraduate students from various Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) campuses in Malaysia. A crosssectional survey design was employed using a structured questionnaire, and data were analysed using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson’s correlation. Results showed that 52.60% of respondents achieved excellent knowledge, 38.31% had good knowledge, 7.14% were adequate, and 1.95% were poor (F (3,150) = 3.92, p = 0.00995). Awareness levels were higher, with 60.39% of respondents classified as excellent and 35.71% as good (F (3,150) = 3.26, p = 0.023). However, practice scores were lower, with 66.23% in the adequate category, 21.43% as poor, and only 12.34% as good (F (3,150) = 10.00, p < 0.00001). Pearson’s correlation revealed a strong positive relationship between knowledge and awareness (r = 0.76, p < 0.001), a moderate positive correlation between knowledge and practice (r = 0.42, p < 0.01), and a weak, non-significant correlation between awareness and practice (r = 0.21, p > 0.05). These findings indicate that while theoretical understanding and awareness of molecular biology are relatively strong, practical engagement remains limited. Bridging this gap requires greater emphasis on hands-on learning and integration of laboratory-based modules within the curriculum. The outcomes of this study provide valuable insights for curriculum enhancement, aiming to align theoretical knowledge, awareness, and practical competency in molecular biology education.

molecular biology, knowledge, awareness, practice

1. Abdullah, Y. A., Jamaluddin, N. B., Yakob, H., Hassan, M. A., Nasrudin, N., Yusup, M., Ahmad Zaki, Z., & Zanudin, K. (2022). Urban governance approaches for low carbon cities: The case of Shah Alam local government, Malaysia. Planning Malaysia: Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 20(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i4.1125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdul Aziz M., Brini F., Rouached H., Masmoudi K. (2022) Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems. Front Plant Sci. 2022 Nov 8;13:1027828. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1027828. PMID: 36426158; PMCID: PMC9680014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abu-Qamar, S., Alshannag, Q., Sartawi, A., & Etayeb, N. (2015). Educational awareness of biotechnology issues among undergraduate students at the United Arab Emirates University. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1299–1318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1036884 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahmad, H., Mohd Zul, A., & Ismail, N. (2021). Undergraduate knowledge, awareness and practice of molecular biology techniques in public universities: A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Bioscience Education, 27(3), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jbe.2021.27.3.122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alyousif, S. H., & Basyah Sallehuddin, A. K. (2024). Females’ resistance to the patriarchal cultures via reclaiming identity and exploring responsibility: A review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i4/24381 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Amin, L., Ahmad Azlan, N. A., Hamdan, M. F., Samian, A. L., & Haron, M. S. (2011). Awareness and knowledge on modern biotechnology in Malaysia. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(58), 12448– 12456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Andrade, C., Menon, V., Ameen, S., & Kumar Praharaj, S. (2020). Designing and conducting knowledge, attitude, and practice surveys in psychiatry: Practical guidance. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 42(6), 478–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620938673 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Azmir, I. A., Muryany, I. M., & Ilyanie, H. Y. (2024). Assessing the improvement of molecular techniques practical skills post-COVID-19 lockdown in undergraduate students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i4/19833 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bioeconomy Corporation. (2022). National Biotechnology Policy 2.0 (DBN 2.0). https://www.bioeconomycorporation.my/corporate/nbp/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cheam, C. L. (2021). Determinants of undergraduates’ academic performance at Universiti Teknologi MARA (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Teknologi MARA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Courtney, K., Moore, R., & Connolly, S. (2025). Exploring student mental models and student experiences to improve the teaching practice of cell and molecular biology. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 26(1), e00211-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00211-24 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. David, F. (2017). Sampling methods in social science research: Principles and practice. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Eldredge, J. D. (2014). Defining the population and sampling frame in evidence-based research. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 102(3), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Farooq, M. S., Chaudhry, A. H., Shafiq, M., & Berhanu, G. (2011). Factors affecting students’ quality of academic performance: A case of secondary school level. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, 7(2), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gormally, C., & Heil, A. (2022). A vision for university biology education for non-science majors. CBE— Life Sciences Education, 21(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-07-0168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Haberbosch, M., Vick, P., Schaal, S., & Schaal, S. (2025). Enhancing molecular biology content knowledge and teaching self-efficacy in pre-service teachers through virtual and hands-on labs and reflective teaching. Education Sciences, 15(5), 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050632 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Johnson, R. B. (2019). Data analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Katherine, J., Miller, D., & Ong, W. (2023). Post-pandemic learning recovery: The impact of COVID-19 on students’ laboratory engagement and performance. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(6), 1453–1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10015-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kobylinski, C., & Prasad, G. (2018). Urban education and infrastructure development in Malaysia: A regional analysis of learning accessibility. Asian Journal of Education and Development Studies, 7(3), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEDS-05-2018-0021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Latifah, A., Rahimah, I., & Farid, N. (2011). Knowledge, attitude, and practice survey on molecular biology among science students in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Science and Education, 35(4), 112– 122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Maglio, C., Williams, M., & Camponeschi, A. (2025). Biology wet lab e-learning during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of student learning and experiences. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 53(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Michael, R. (2023). Understanding research populations and sampling frameworks: A methodological overview. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(8), 1075–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2231145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mullis, K.B. and Faloona, F.A. (1987) Specific Synthesis of DNA in Vitro via a Polymerase-Catalyzed Chain Reaction. Methods in Enzymology, 155, 335-350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mustapha, R. (2017). High-skilled workforce development in Malaysia: Policy challenges and strategies. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2017.31.1.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). Defining inclusion and exclusion criteria in educational research. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(12), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Oswald-Egg, M. E., & Renold, U. (2021). No experience, no employment: The effect of vocational education and training work experience on labour market outcomes after higher education. Economics of Education Review, 80, Article 102065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Owojori, O. M. (2022). Students’ knowledge, attitude, and perception (KAP) to solid waste management at a rural university. Sustainability, 14(3), 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Pillay, M. (2005). Knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) survey [Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch University]. https://scholar.sun.ac.za [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Qu, M., Hou, Q., Li, X., Yu, C., Xia, J., & Dong, Z. (2024). Application of a flipped classroom incorporating modified team-based learning in molecular biology laboratory teaching: A mixed methods study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1442. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06450-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rahman, M., & Golam, K. (2021). SPSS for beginners: Step-by-step data analysis guide. Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Salleh, M. S., Safri, S. M., & Azizi, M. A. (2024). The impact of time management and social interaction on online learning stress among university students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(12), 4295–4307. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i12/23055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Shendure, J., Balasubramanian, S., Church, G. et al. (2017) DNA sequencing at 40: past, present and future. Nature 550, 345–353 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Southard, K., Wince, T., Middleton, S., & Bolger, M. S. (2016). Features of knowledge building in biology: Understanding undergraduate students’ ideas about molecular mechanisms. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(1), ar7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-05-0114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sulaiman, M., Ghazali, A. R., & Ahmad, N. (2015). Sampling methods and research design in social sciences. Universiti Teknologi MARA Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Supple, M. A., & Shapiro, B. (2018). “Conservation of biodiversity in the genomics era.” Genome Biology, 19, 131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Thomas, P. (2020). Research methodology and design: A guide for health and social sciences. Journal of Health Education Research & Development, 8(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.4172/2380-5439.1000230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Turney, P. (2023). Quantitative data interpretation in biological education research. Journal of Biological Education, 57(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2079234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Universiti Teknologi MARA. (2024). Universiti Teknologi MARA annual facts and figures report 2024. UiTM Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Universiti Teknologi MARA. (n.d.). About UiTM: Fact & figures. https://www.uitm.edu.my/index.php/en/discover-uitm/about-uitm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Urbanice Malaysia. (2021). Low carbon cities framework report: Shah Alam local government. Urbanice Malaysia Publications. https://www.urbanicemalaysia.com.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Waring-Sparks, A. L. (2024). Advanced biology students’ individual conceptions of scientific models: Effects on skills, attitudes, and perceptions. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 26(1), e00211-23. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00183-23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Witriana, N. I., et al. (2025). Development and validation of instruments to portray knowledge, attitude and practices regarding antibiotics and resistance. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(8), em2688. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zarei, F., et al. (2024). ChecKAP: A checklist for reporting a Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) study. Heliyon, 10(3), e25611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25611 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Green Synthesis of Calcium Oxide Nanoparticles from Pigeon Eggshells for Cement Composites
• Needs Analysis: Development of an Interactive Digital Storybook in Teaching Mixtures and their Characteristics among Grade 6 Learners
• Thickness Dependent Structural, Optical, Electrical and Gas Sensing properties of ZnO thin film
• Forensic Chemistry Laboratory Works from Home: Challenges Encountered by Criminology Students During the Conduct of their Laboratory Activities at Home
• The Concept of Wellness Club and How it Differs from the Present Gym?