The Legal Status of Non-Fungible Token in Islamic Financial System

The rapid expansion of decentralised finance (DeFi) has elevated digital assets, particularly Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), to a prominent position within contemporary financial markets. NFTs are blockchain-based digital tokens enabled by smart contracts that facilitate verifiable ownership and authentication in decentralised environments. Despite growing international efforts to regulate NFT markets, clear legal frameworks—especially those addressing Shariah-compliant NFTs—remain underdeveloped. In Malaysia, the Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 (IFSA) and the Securities Commission Malaysia’s Digital Assets Guidelines provide only limited guidance on the classification, ownership, and enforceability of NFT-based financial products. This article examines the development of NFTs, analyses the existing Malaysian legal framework, and evaluates the readiness of Malaysia’s regulatory architecture to accommodate Shariah-compliant NFTs. Adopting a doctrinal methodology supported by case analysis, the study explores the applicability of current laws to NFT transactions and undertakes a comparative assessment of regulatory developments in the United Arab Emirates. The absence of explicit regulatory provisions raises significant Shariah compliance concerns, particularly in relation to gharar (uncertainty), riba (usury), and the recognition of māl (legitimate ownership), which may impede Malaysia’s aspiration to emerge as an Islamic DeFi hub. This study finds that Malaysia’s existing legal framework lacks specific Shariah compliance mechanisms for the legal recognition and governance of NFTs. Accordingly, targeted regulatory reforms are necessary to address the legal and Shariah complexities associated with NFTs and to facilitate responsible digital innovation within Malaysia’s Islamic DeFi ecosystem.

Non-Fungible Token – Decentralized Finance – Shariah Compliant

1. Asma Hakimah Ab Halim, Ruzian Markom & Wan Amir Azlan Wan Haniff (2025). The role of the financial metaverse and its compliance with shariah principles.Leveraging Advanced Technologies: Business Model Innovation and the Future, 551-557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, A. A., Zain, M. N. M., & Zakaria, N. D. A. (2024). The Position of Smart Contracts in the Light of Islamic Contract Theory. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 8(1), 144-171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmad, A. A., & Mohd Sobri, N. A. (2024). Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) in Islamic perspective: Challenges and way forward. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Law, 9(1), 8–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahmad, Najib, M., & Makkarateng, M. A. Y. (2025). Fatwa and Virtual Reality: The Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Perspective on the Metaverse and Virtual Life. Parewa Saraq: Journal of Islamic Law and Fatwa Review, 4(2), 101-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. AlFzari, S. M. A. A., Rosman, A. S., Bayoumi, K., & Samat @ Darawi, A. B. (2024). Ten ways the metaverse will reshape the world: An Islamic perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(11), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i11/23170 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Amirza, M. A., Razak, M. R. A., Kamaruzaman, M. F., & Anwar, R. (2023). Non-fungible token (NFT) in Malaysian creative arts: The status quo of tokenisation [Conference session]. 2023 IEEE 13th Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE), Penang, Malaysia, 299. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAIE57739.2023.10165499 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Aytas, M., & Karaviran, C. (2025). Looking at NFT art through the eyes of virtual communities: A netnographic analysis. Sage Open, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241311348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Babah, M. M. L. (2024). Smart contracts: Applications and Shariah issues [title in original Arabic script]. Al-Maqrizi lil-Dirasat al-Iqtisadiyah wa-al-Maliyah, 8(1), 465–486. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bank Negara Malaysia. (2018). Policy document on payment systems (Policy Document). Bank Negara Malaysia. https://www.bnm.gov.my/example-payment-systems-2018.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bank Negara Malaysia. (2025). Discussion paper on asset tokenisation in the Malaysian financial sector (Discussion Paper). Bank Negara Malaysia. https://www.bnm.gov.my/documents/20124/938039/Discussion_Paper_on_Asset_Tokenisation.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bank Negara Malaysia & Securities Commission Malaysia. (2018, December 6). Joint Statement on Regulation of Digital Assets in Malaysia. Bank Negara Malaysia. https://www.bnm.gov.my/-/joint-statement-on-regulation-of-digital-assets-in-malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Boudkhil, M. E. (2025). New NFT marketplace and challenges of transactions on Islamic NFTs. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics, 21(2). https://srfe.journals.es/vol-21-issue-02/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Calvo, P. (2024). Cryptoart: Ethical challenges of the NFT revolution. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 2872. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-02872-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chan, M. (2021, September 21). Malaysian graffiti artist Katun sold his NFT collections for a total of over RM1.6mil in 24 hours. Options The Edge. https://www.optionstheedge.com/topic/culture/malaysian-graffiti-artist-katun-sold-his-nft-collections-total-over-rm16mil-24-hours [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chen, J., & Friedmann, D. (2023). Jumping from mother monkey to bored ape: The value of NFTs from an artist’s and intellectual property perspective. Asia Pacific Law Review, 31(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2117485 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Christie’s. (n.d.). Beeple: A visionary digital artist at the forefront of NFTs. Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://www.christies.com/en/stories/monumental-collage-by-beeple-is-first-purely-digital-artwork-nft-to-come-to-auction-0463a2c0f3174b17997fba8a1fe4c865 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. De Sousa, F. M. (2022). Token-art system and the new international art market: The impacts of NFT technology and the legal aspects involved. Journal of Law, Marketing & Innovation, 104–123. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jlolwmkt2022&i=104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Digital Assets - Guidelines’ (Securities Commission Malaysia) <https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/guidelines/digital-assets> accessed 1 July 2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Dubai International Financial Centre. (2024). Digital Assets Law, DIFC Law No. 2 of 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/dubaiintern0078-difcexperie96c5-productionn 3253/media/project/difcexperiences/difc/difcwebsite/documents/laws--regulations/digital_assets_law_2_of_2024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fadzil, N. F. I. (2024). Non-fungible tokens (NFT) investment: A juristic and analytical study. Jurnal Fiqh, 21(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol21no1.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Febriandika, N. R., Fadli, F., & Mi’raj, D. A. (2022). How are NFT (non-fungible token) transactions reviewed according to Islamic law? Borobudur Law Review, 4(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Guadamuz, A. (2021). The treachery of images: Non-fungible tokens and copyright. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 16(12), 1367–1378. https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/16/12/1367/6449489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. International Shari’ah Research Academy for Islamic Finance. (2023). Islamic financial system: Principles & operations (3rd ed.). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Jia, W., & Yao, B. (2023). NFTs applied to the art sector: Legal issues and recent jurisprudence. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 30, 807–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231199966 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kepli, M. Y. Z. (2015). Introduction to Islamic finance. Malaysian Current Law Journal Publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kumar, A., Shankar, A., Behl, A., & Wamba, S. F. (2025). Do you believe in the metaverse NFTs? Understanding the value proposition of NFTs in the metaverse. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 210, 123880. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Law No. (4) of 2022 Regulating Virtual Assets in the Emirate of Dubai. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri Malaysia. (n.d.). The issues surrounding cryptocurrency in Malaysian taxation. https://phl.hasil.gov.my/pdf/pdfam/20211004_The_Malaysian_Reserve_The_Issues_Surrounding_Cryptocurrency_in_Malaysian_Taxation.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lee, E. (2023). NFTs as decentralized intellectual property. University of Illinois Law Review, 2023, 1049–1077. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/unilllr2023&i=1077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mazza, R. (2025, March 12). Islamic DeFi: The future of Shariah-compliant fintech on blockchain. FinTech Weekly. Retrieved November 1, 2025, from https://www.fintechweekly.com/magazine/articles/islamic-decentralized-finance-defi-explained [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Malay Mail. (2025, May 26). Malaysia eyes role as Islamic crypto capital with KWAP’s strategic stake in Fasset. Malay Mail. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Malaysia, 1967. Income Tax Act 1967 [Act 53] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Malaysia, 1993. Securities Commission Act 1993 [Act 498] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Malaysia, 2007. Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 [Act 671] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Malaysia, 2009. Central Bank of Malaysia Act 2009 [Act 701] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Malaysia, 2010. Personal Data Protection Act 2010 [Act 709] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Malaysia, 2013. Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 [Act 759] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Malaysia, 2019. Capital Markets and Services (Prescription of Securities) (Digital Currency and Digital Token) Order 2019 [P.U.(A) 12/2019] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Murray, M. D. (2023). NFT ownership and copyrights. Indiana Law Review, 56, 367–385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Mustajap, S. I., et al. (2024). The potential of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) in enhancing Malaysia’s arts and cultural heritage preservation. PaperASIA, 40, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v40i6b.282 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Polyviou, A., & Pappas, I. O. (2023). Chasing metaverses: Reflecting on existing literature to understand the business value of metaverses. Information Systems Frontiers, 25, 2417–2438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10364-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ramli, I., et al. (2025, April). Blockchain technology? Visual art marketing through non-fungible token (NFT) from the perspectives of Islamic Shariah in Malaysia: A need assessment analyses. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computing and Information Technology (ICCIT) (pp. 367–371). Retrieved October 20, 2025, from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ritterbusch, G. D., & Teichmann, M. R. (2023). Defining the metaverse: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 12368–12386. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10035386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Robert Ong Thien Cheng v Luno Pte Ltd & Anor (High Court of Malaya, Shah Alam, Appeal No 12BNCVC-91-10/2018) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Rouhani, S., & Deters, R. (2019). Security, performance, and applications of smart contracts: A systematic survey. IEEE Access, 7, 50759–50779. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8689026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Sharlife. (2024). Shariah perspective on stablecoins. https://sharlife.my/article/content/shariah-perspective-on-stablecoins [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Selim, N. (2023). Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) in Islamic perspective. Astrolabe, 5, 36. https://www.ukm.my/jcil/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Azlin-2024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Securities Commission Malaysia. (2020). Digital assets from Shariah perspective: Resolutions of the Shariah Advisory Council (SAC Meeting 233rd & 234th, 29 June & 20 July 2020). Securities Commission Malaysia. https://www.sc.com.my/api/documentms/download.ashx?id=19e924bb-3d3f-405f-9fc2-0008f02fdd2a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Tan, C. (2024). Rights in NFTs and the flourishing of NFT marketplaces. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 32(1), Article eaae018. https://academic.oup.com/ijlit/article/32/1/eaae018/7746479 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Thong Ming Sen. Registration and Enforcement of Blockchain Intellectual Property (IP) Rights [2023] 3 MLJ xxvi [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Wallet, T. (2023, December 5). How to mint NFTs: A beginner’s guide. Trust Blog. https://trustwallet.com/blog/nft/how-to-mint-nfts-a-beginners-guide [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. World Economic Forum. (2024). Digital assets regulation: Insights from jurisdictional approaches (Insight Report). World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF Digital Assets Regulation 2024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Zaibon, S. B. ., Mustajap, S. I. ., Husain, A. ., Ismail, M. A. H. ., Jamali, S. S., Alwi, A. ., Abdul Hamid, M. N., Hanafi, H. F. ., & Yusuf, I. A. . (2024). Technological Framework of NFTs and Smart Contracts for Preserving Malaysian Arts and Cultural Heritage. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 123(1), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.37934/ard.123.1.226242 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Zamri, M. T. M., Ahmad, A. A., & Jusoh @ Yusoff, A. F. (2025). Shariah compliance and ethical issues in NFT games: Analyzing cryptocurrency transactions and market risks. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance & Management Sciences, 15(1), 190–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v15-i1/24052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.