The Mediating Effect of Employee Creativity on the Relationship between Situational Leadership and Marketing Innovation in the Malaysian Retail Industry

Authors

Anitha Devi Rathakrisnan

Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Jalan SS6/3 Kelana Jaya, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor (Malaysia)

Haliza Mohd Said

Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Jalan SS6/3 Kelana Jaya, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor (Malaysia)

James George

Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Jalan SS6/3 Kelana Jaya, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor (Malaysia)

Isvariya Viaran

Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Jalan SS6/3 Kelana Jaya, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor (Malaysia)

Preiyangka Muthusamy

Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Jalan SS6/3 Kelana Jaya, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800465

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 7264-7275

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-21

Accepted: 2026-08-26

Published: 2026-09-08

Abstract

The main objective of the study is to examine the effect of situational leadership on marketing innovation in the Malaysian retail industry, particularly through the mediating role of employee creativity. Grounded in Situational Leadership Theory and Componential Theory of Creativity, the study adopts a quantitative research design with a cross-sectional approach. A non-probability sampling design using purposive sampling was employed to select full-time retail workers located in Klang Valley area, resulting in a final sample of 398 valid responses analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics. The findings provide strong empirical support for all four hypotheses, indicating that situational leadership has a positive and significant relationship with both marketing innovation (r = 0.518) and employee creativity (r = 0.597), while employee creativity shows a strong relationship with marketing innovation (r = 0.737). More importantly, mediation analysis confirms that employee creativity acts as a full mediator (H4), suggesting that leadership adaptability does not directly enhance innovation but instead fosters a supportive environment that promotes creative behaviors necessary for marketing breakthroughs (indirect effect = 0.4233). In conclusion, while the study underscores the importance of adaptive leadership in the retail sector, future research should consider longitudinal designs and expand the geographical and industrial scope to sectors such as banking and hospitality to further validate these causal relationships.

Keywords

Employee Creativity, Marketing Innovation, Retail Industry, Situational Leadership, Componential Theory of Creativity

Downloads

References

1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to "The Social Psychology of Creativity." Westview Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2024). Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 33-64). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in organizational behavior, 36, 157-183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Deloitte. 2024. 2024 US Retail Industry Outlook: Looking for Loyalty in All the Right Places. Deloitte Insights. deloitte.com. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/industries/consumer/articles/retail-distribution-industry-outlook.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kumar, V., & Reinartz, W. (2016). Creating Enduring Customer Value. Journal of [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Marketing, 80(6), 36−68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Farmer, Steven & Graen, George. (2006). An Examination of Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Relevance of Traits and Relationships. Personnel Psychology. 52. 591 - 620. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Graeff, C.L. (1997) Evolution of Situational Leadership Theory: A Critical Review. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(97)90014-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Managing research and development personnel: An application of leadership theory. Research Management, 12(5), 331-338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The leadership quarterly, 14(4-5), 525-544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ivanna, Pererva & Myronova, Olga. (2023). Use of creative marketing in the implementation of enterprise strategy. Economics of Development. 22. 10.57111/econ/2.2023.28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mohd Said, H., Jobin John, G., Md Rujhan, K. Z., & Mohd Yusof, M. S. (2025). The Impact Of Different Leadership Styles In Selected Energy & Utilities Organizations In Klang Valley: A Moderating Effect Of Employee Acceptance Towards The Success Of Organizational Change. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 7(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18227526 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mohamad Nor, S., May, K. Y., Yen, Y. L., & Binijin, J. V. (2024). A study on the relationship of leadership styles on employees’ job performance in SMEs in Klang Valley, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(3), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tierney, P. (2024). Leadership and employee creativity. In Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 95-124). Psychology Press https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781003573326-6&type=chapterpdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. O'Connor, M., Conboy, K., Dennehy, D., & Carroll, N. (2024). Temporal complexity in information systems development flow: Challenges and recommendations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 54(1), 699-735. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. OECD/Eurostat (2018), Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. OECD (2018), OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2018, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/pdtvy-2018-en. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Thompson, G., & Vecchio, R. P. (2009). Situational leadership theory: A test of three versions. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.06.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wan, X., He, R., Zhang, G., & Zhou, J. (2022). Employee engagement and open service innovation: The roles of creative self-efficacy and employee innovative behaviour. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 921687. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921687/full [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wang X, Liu Y, Peng Z, Li B, Liang Q, Liao S, Liu M. (2024). Situational leadership theory in nursing management: a scoping review. BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 19;23(1):930. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02582-9. PMID: 39702117; PMCID: PMC11660562. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zhang, Y. (2025). Cultivating a culture of innovation: The impact of leadership style on employee well-being and organizational creativity. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 2(1), 202-210. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a099/affa88e4ffe953272741c719703f9f4b7d0e.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zhou,J., & George, J. M. (2001). When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682-696. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069410 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles