The Mediating Role of Learning Motivation in the Relationship Between Online Learning Environment and Cognitive Engagement Among Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Students in Selangor

The rapid development of digital technology has transformed higher education and increased the importance of Open and Distance Learning (ODL). However, the effectiveness of online learning depends not only on the availability of digital platforms but also on the quality of the learning environment and students’ willingness to invest mental effort in their studies. This study examines the relationships between Technology Support, Learning Accessibility, Interaction and Communication, Learning Motivation, and Cognitive Engagement among ODL students in Selangor. It also investigates whether Learning Motivation mediates the relationships between the three dimensions of the online learning environment and Cognitive Engagement. A quantitative cross-sectional design was adopted, and data were collected through a structured online questionnaire. A total of 297 completed responses were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, Pearson correlation, multiple regression, and regression-based mediation analysis using PROCESS Macro Model 4 with 5,000 bootstrap resamples were conducted. All seven direct relationships were positive and statistically significant at p < .001. The regression model explained 79.3% of the variance in Cognitive Engagement. Learning Motivation partially mediated the effects of Technology Support, Learning Accessibility, and Interaction and Communication on Cognitive Engagement. The findings show that effective ODL requires reliable technology, accessible resources, meaningful interaction, and strong motivational support. These factors operate together to encourage students to participate more deeply in their learning activities.

Online Learning Environment, Learning Motivation, Cognitive Engagement, Open and Distance Learning, Technology Support, Learning Accessibility

1. Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227– 268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of knowledge transformation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hartnett, M. (2016). Motivation in online education. Singapore: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981-10-0700-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hartnett, M., George, A. S., & Dron, J. (2011). Examining motivation in online distance learning environments: Complex, multifaceted and situation-dependent. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 20–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.1030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Nair, S.D., Nesamany, S.S. (2021). Teacher Perception Of Online Teaching Approaches During The Pandemic Covid-19. Asian Journal of Social Science Research (e-ISSN: 2600-9706) Volume 3, Issue 2, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8063275 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nik Roseli, N.E., Che Ani, S., Sharim, M.A., Hong, K.M. (2023). Online teaching and learning challenges during the Covid–19 pandemic for preschool teachers. Asian Journal of Social Science Research (e-ISSN: 2600-9706) Volume 5, Issue 2, 71-83, 2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10437799 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rahman, N., Abdul Karim, N., Hussin, Nur. (2023). Use of technology in learning and teaching mathematics using information technology literacy and skills. Asian Journal of Social Science Research (e-ISSN: 2600-9706) Volume 5, Issue 2, 100-110, 2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10438286 Asian Journal of Social Science Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2022). Agentic Engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 95-107). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Xie, K., Di Tosto, G., Lu, L., & Cho, Y. (2020). Detecting and measuring engagement in online learning: A review. Computers & Education, 159, 104006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
• Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
• Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
• Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
• Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area