The Meeting Point of Belief and Skepticism in Eliot's Poetry and Criticism

A recurring conflict between faith and skepticism characterizes T. S. Eliot's literary career and is central to both his poetry and critical prose. After converting to Anglicanism, Eliot is frequently regarded as a poet of religious affirmation, but his writings nonetheless reflect moral disquiet, societal disintegration, and profound epistemological ambiguity. The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, The Waste Land, The Hollow Men, and Ash-Wednesday are a few of Eliot's poems that are examined in this essay, along with critical works like
Tradition and the Individual Talent, The Idea of a Christian Society, and Notes Towards the Definition of Culture. The study contends that Eliot's religious and cultural claims are never completely stable and are instead plagued by uncertainty, discontinuity, and textual ambiguity, drawing on post-structuralist concepts from Derrida, Barthes, and Foucault. While his critique tries—often nervously—to impose order, tradition, and authority upon a fractured modern reality, his poetry dramatizes the modern subject's oscillation between the longing for transcendental meaning and the realization of its ongoing deferral. The study argues that Eliot's relevance is found in maintaining the tense cohabitation of believing and skepticism rather than in resolving the tension between them. This places Eliot's work at the intersection of postmodern skepticism toward absolute truths and modernist longing for religion. This study demonstrates how belief in Eliot functions less as doctrinal certainty and more as a brittle, contested practice molded by historical, cultural, and discursive influences by reading Eliot's poetry and criticism together.

post-structuralism, reader-response

1. Asher, Kenneth. ‘T. S. Eliot and Ideology.’ Cambridge University Press, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barthes, Roland. “The Pleasure of the Text.’’ Translated by Richard Miller, Hill and Wang, 1975. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bush, Ronald. “T. S. Eliot: A Study in Character and Style.’’ Oxford University Press, 1983. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Derrida, Jacques, “Writing and Difference.’’ Translated by Alan Bass, University of Chicago Press, 1978. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Eliot, T. S. Selected Essays, Faber and Faber, 1951. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. On Poetry and Poets. Faber and Faber, 1957. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. The Waste Land and Other Poems. Edited by Frank Kermode, Penguin Classics, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ash Wednesday. Faber and Faber, 1930. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Four Quartets. Faber and Faber, 1944. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Notes Towards the Definition of Culture. Faber and Faber, 1948. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Naugle, David K. “The Intellectual and Religious Development of T. S. Eliot: Reflected in Selected Readings of His Poetry with Emphasis on Ash Wednesday.” Dallas Baptist University, n.d. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Smith, Grover. ‘’T. S. Eliot’s Poetry and Plays: A Study in Sources and Meaning.’’ University of Chicago Press, 1956. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Weidner, Stephen. “T. S. Eliot: Poet and Critic as Historical Theorist.” Loyola University New Orleans, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Culture: The (In) Human Engagement with Nature
• Identity Crisis in Orhan Pamuk’s The Black Book: A Critical Interpretation
• Metaphor in Pop-Up Swahili Sayings: Is it a New Meaning or a New Idea?
• Racial Identity and Ecological Belonging in Toni Morrison’s Beloved: A Study through Social Identity Theory and Eco-Race Theory
• The Role of Non-Human Agency in Contemporary Literature: A Posthumanist Analysis