The Misinformation Crisis: How Social Media Undermines Democratic Legitimacy and Political Deliberation

The rapid growth of social media has had an impact on political communication that has never before been seen. It provides an enormous opportunity for information to be disseminated. Perhaps one of the biggest concerns of social media is the widespread dissemination of “misinformation ” a topic that Study has shown has had an appreciable impact on society and a disproportionate impact on democratic processes and the widening of the gap in the political spectrum. This paper examines the relationship of misinformation to democracy with emphasis placed upon the role social media sites play in spreading fake or misleading information. Using theoretical frameworks and empirical data from case studies, the paper illustrates and provides insight into the harmful effects misinformation can have on the legitimacy of democratic institutions and the increase in ideological polarization toward elections. The paper continues to provide insights on how the concepts of algorithms, echo chambers and filter bubbles help promote the reinforcement of polarized viewpoints at the expense of deliberative democracy. Finally, the paper concludes with potential remedies to address the problem of misinformation, such as improving media literacy and fact checking and regulatory measures while also emphasizing the need to find a balance between addressing the spread of misinformation and protecting free speech.

Misinformation Crisis, Social Media, Democratic Legitimacy, Political Deliberation

1. Misinformation has also been used as the fake News throughout the study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Mark U Steinberg, Voices of Revolution, 1917 (Yale University Press 2001). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. W Joseph Campbell, Yellow Journalism: Puncturing the Myths, Defining the Legacies (Praeger 2001). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Philip M Taylor, Munitions of the Mind: A History of Propaganda from the Ancient World to the Present Day (3rd edn, Manchester University Press 2003). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. European Commission, Fake News and Disinformation Online (Flash Eurobarometer 464, European Union 2018) https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2183 accessed 22 November 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Yochai Benkler, Robert Faris, and Hal Roberts, Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics (Oxford University Press 2018). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral, ‘The Spread of True and False News Online’ (2018) 359 Science 1146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzkow, ‘Social Media and Misinformation in the 2016 Election’ (2017) 31 Journal of Economic Perspectives 211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Emily Harmer and others, Online Othering: Exploring Digital Violence and Discrimination on the Web (Palgrave Macmillan 2019). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President (Oxford University Press 2018). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Joyojeet Pal, WhatsApp and Political Instability in India (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2019). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzkow, ‘Social Media and Misinformation in the 2016 Election’ (2017) 31 Journal of Economic Perspectives 211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. ibid [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. ibid [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cass R Sunstein, #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media (Princeton University Press 2017). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. ibid [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Bramer, W. M., Giustini, D., & Kramer, B. M. R. (2016), Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: A prospective study, Systematic Reviews,5(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0215-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Acerbi, A., Altay, S., & Mercier, H. (2022), Fighting misinformation or fighting for information?. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 3(1)., https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Aftab, O., & Murphy, G. (2022), A single exposure to cancer misinformation may not significantly affect related behavioural intentions. HRB Open Study, 5(82), 82. https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13640.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Albarracin, D., & Shavitt, S. (2018). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 299–327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Bastick, Z. (2021). Would you notice if fake news changed your behavior? An experiment on the unconscious effects of disinformation., Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106633, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2022). Attitudes, habits, and behavior change. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-011744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020), which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses, Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources, Study Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nagasako, T. (2020), Global disinformation campaigns and legal challenges, International Cyber security Law Review, 1(1–2), 125–136, https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-020-00010-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Tenove, C. (2020). Protecting democracy from disinformation: Normative threats and policy responses, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 517–537, https://doi.org/10.1177/194016122091874 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Erlich, A., & Garner, C. (2023), Is pro-Kremlin disinformation effective? Evidence from Ukraine, the International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211045221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Saint Laurent, C., Murphy, G., Hegarty, K., & Greene, C. M. (2022). Measuring the effects of misinformation exposure and beliefs on behavioural intentions: A COVID-19 vaccination study. Cognitive Study: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00437-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Study Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wilson, T., & Starbird, K. (2020). Cross-platform disinformation campaigns: lessons learned and next steps. Harvard Kennedy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Murphy, G., Lynch, L., Loftus, E., & Egan, R. (2021). Push polls increase false memories for fake new stories. Memory, 29(6), 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1934033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Fazio, L. K., Pillai, R. M., & Patel, D. (2022). The effects of repetition on belief in naturalistic settings, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(10), 2604–2613. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tenove, C. (2020). Protecting democracy from disinformation: Normative threats and policy responses, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220918740 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Robert A Dahl, On Democracy (Yale University Press 1998). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ibid [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Larry Diamond, ‘Facing Up to the Democratic Recession’ (2015) 26 Journal of Democracy 141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Fiveable. "democratic legitimacy – Intro to Comparative Politics." Edited by Becky Bahr, Fiveable, 2024, https://fiveable.me/keyterms/introduction-comparative-politics/democratic-legitimacy. Accessed 13 Nov. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Ibid [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Steiner, J., Bächtinger, A., Spörndli, M., & Steenbergen, M. (2005). Deliberative politics in action: Analyzing Parliamentary discourse. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Sunstein, C. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Warren, M. & Pearse, H. (2008). Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Noel, H. (2012). The Coalition Merchants: The ideological roots of the civil rights realignment. Journal of Politics, 74(1), 156–173 53 Nolan McCarty, Keith T Poole and Howard Rosenthal, Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (MIT Press 2006). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. José van Dijck, The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media (Oxford University Press 2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Marc J Hetherington, ‘Review Article: Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization’ (2001) 95 American Political Science Review 619. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Cass R Sunstein, #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media (Princeton University Press 2017). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy and Sinan Aral, ‘The Spread of True and False News Online’ (2018) 359 Science 1146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw, ‘The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media’ (1972) 36 Public Opinion Quarterly 176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw, ‘The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media’ (1972) 36 Public Opinion Quarterly 176 60 Robert M Entman, ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’ (1993) 43 Journal of Communication 51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Budd, M., Entman, R. M., & Steinman, C. (1990), the affirmative character of U.S. cultural studies, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 169-184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, the Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion – Our Social Skin (University of Chicago Press 1984). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Zaller, J. R. (1992). 7'be nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Ibid [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Diana C Mutz, Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy (Cambridge University Press 2006). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Eli Pariser, The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You (Penguin 2011). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Jürgen Habermas, the Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (MIT Press 1991). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Reglitz, M 2022, 'Fake news and democracy', Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 162-187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Beckett, Charlie, and Sonia Livingstone., Tackling the Information Crisis: A Policy Framework for Media System Resilience., London School of Economics and Political Science, 2018, https://www.lse.ac.uk/law/news/2018/truth-trust -technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Sunstein, Cass. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Anderson, Elizabeth. 2021. “Epistemic Bubbles and Authoritarian Politics.” In Political Epistemology, edited by Elizabeth Edenberg and Michael Hannon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Bronstein, Michael V., Pennycook, Gordon, Bear, Adam, Rand, David G. and Cannon, Tyrone D. 2019. “Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 8 (1): 108-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Minow, Saving the News (n 23) pp. 120–25; Eugene Volokh, ‘Treating Social Media Platforms Like Common Carriers?’ (2021) 1 Journal of Free Speech Law 377, at 383, 433–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Roger Koppl and Abigail Devereaux, ‘Biden Establishes a Ministry of Truth’, The Wall Street Journal, 1 May 2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Alexander Meiklejohn, Free Speech and Its Relation to Self-Government (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1948) pp. 25–27, 88–91 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. David A. Graham, ‘The “Comet Pizza” Gunman Provides a Glimpse of a Frightening Future’, The Atlantic, 5 December 2016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Lymari Morales, ‘Distrust in US Media Edges Up to Record High’, Gallup, 29 September 2010, https://news.gallup.com/poll/143267/distrust-media-edges-record-high.aspx. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Jeremy Barr, ‘Why These Fox News Loyalists Have Changed the Channel to Newsmax’, The Washington Post, 27 December [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. 2020, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. John Milton, Areopagitica (ed. by J. W. Hales, Oxford: Clarendon, (1644) 1874) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Adee Hassan, ‘Covid Vaccine Misinformation Still Fuels Fears Surrounding Pregnancy, a New Study Finds’, The New York Times, 3 June 2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Robert D. Putnam, Bowling Alone: Revised and Updated: The Collapse and Revival of the American Community (New York: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Simon & Schuster, 2020). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Donie O’Sullivan, ‘Her Son Was an Accused Cult Leader – She Says He Was a Victim, Too’, CNN.com, 23 September 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Clothilde Goujard, ‘Musk Ousts X Team Curbing Election Disinformation’, Politico, 28 September 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Michal Piksa, Karolina Noworyta, Aleksander Gundersen, Jonas Kunst, Mikołaj Morzy, Jan Piasecki and Rafał Rygula, ‘The Impact of Confirmation Bias Awareness on Mitigating Susceptibility to Misinformation’ (2024) 12 Frontiers in Public Health 1414864, doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1414864. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. American Psychological Association, “Why We’re Susceptible to Fake News, How to Defend Against It” (ScienceDaily, 10 August 2018) <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180810120037.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. N Boonprakong, S Pareek, B Tag, J Goncalves and T Dingler, Assessing Susceptibility Factors of Confirmation Bias in News Feed [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Reading (SSRN, 17 April 2024) https://ssrn.com/abstract=4797710 93‘Confirmation bias’ (Wikipedia) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias) accessed 22 November 2025. 94 Yanqing Sun and Juan Xie, ‘Do Heuristic Cues Affect Misinformation Sharing? Evidence From a Meta-Analysis’ (2024) Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly doi:10.1177/10776990241284597. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. ‘Affect Heuristic’ (Thinking Toolbox, Ness Labs) https://toolbox.nesslabs.com/affect-heuristic accessed 22 November 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Manuel Funke, Moritz Schularick and Christoph Trebesch, ‘Going to Extremes: Politics after Financial Crises, 1870–2014’ (2016) 88 European Economic Review 227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Noortje Marres and Matías Valderrama Barragán, ‘Making Expert Advice Public in a Time of Emergency: Independent SAGE and the Contestation of Science During the COVID Pandemic in the UK’ (2025) Social Studies of Science 55(4) 512, doi:10.1177/03063127241309071. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. ‘Cognitive biases, why do we swallow the misinformation bait?’ (mSchools, 3 July 2022) https://mschools.com/cognitive-biaseswhy-do-we-swallow-the-misinformation-bait/ accessed 22 November 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Y Zhou and L Shen, ‘Processing of Misinformation as Motivational and Cognitive Biases’ (2024) 15 Frontiers in Psychology 1430953, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430953. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Tworek, H. (2019, April 15). An Analysis of Germany’s NetzDG Law., Transatlantic Working Group; University of British [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Columbia, https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/NetzDG_Tworek_Leerssen_April_2019.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Michael Barthel, Amy Mitchell and Jesse Holcomb, Many Americans Believe Fake News Is Sowing Confusion (Pew Research Center, 15 December 2016) https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowingconfusion/ accessed 22 November 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. W Phillips Davidson, ‘The Third-Person Effect in Communication’ (1983) 47(1) Public Opinion Quarterly 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Lilliana Mason, ‘Ideologues without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities’ (2018) 82(S1) Political Opinion Quarterly 866. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (Profile Books 2019). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Lance W Bennett and Steven Livingston, ‘The Disinformation Order: Disruptive Communication and the Decline of Democratic Institutions’ (2018) 33(2) European Journal of Communication 122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Nir Grinberg, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, Briony Swire-Thompson and David Lazer, ‘Fake News on Twitter during the 2016 US Presidential Election’ (2019) 363(6425) Science 374. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. ndrew Guess, Jonathan Nagler and Joshua Tucker, ‘Less Than You Think: Prevalence and Predictors of Fake News Dissemination on Facebook’ (2019) 5(1) Science Advances 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Branko Milanovic, Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization (Harvard University Press 2016). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. David M J Lazer, Matthew A Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J Berinsky, Kelly M Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J Metzger et al, ‘The Science of Fake News: Addressing Fake News Requires a Multidisciplinary Effort’ (2018) 359(6380) Science 1094. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Nahema Marchal, Bence Kollanyi, Lisa-Maria Neudert and Philip N Howard, Junk News during the EU Parliamentary Elections: Lessons from a Seven-Language Study of Twitter and Facebook (Data Memo 2019.3, Oxford Internet Institute 2019) https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2019/05/EU-Data-Memo.pdf accessed 22 November 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Hélène Landemore, Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many (Princeton University Press 2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. David M J Lazer, Matthew A Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J Berinsky, Kelly M Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J Metzger et al, ‘The Science of Fake News: Addressing Fake News Requires a Multidisciplinary Effort’ (2018) 359(6380) Science 1094. 122 Levi Boxell, Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M Shapiro, ‘Is the Internet Causing Political Polarization? Evidence from Demographics’ (National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 23258, March 2017). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Hélène Landemore, Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many (Princeton University Press 2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Craig Silverman, ‘This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News on Facebook’ (BuzzFeed News, 16 November 2016) https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-newson-facebook accessed 22 November 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Jacob Soll, ‘The Long and Brutal History of Fake News’ (Politico, 19 December 2016) https://www.politico.eu/article/fake-newselections-trump-media/ accessed 22 November 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Robert Talisse, Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in Its Place (Oxford University Press 2019). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Nahema Marchal, Bence Kollanyi, Lisa-Maria Neudert and Philip N Howard, Junk News during the EU Parliamentary Elections: Lessons from a Seven-Language Study of Twitter and Facebook (Data Memo 2019.3, Oxford Internet Institute 2019) https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2019/05/EU-Data-Memo.pdf accessed 22 November 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Lilliana Mason, ‘Ideologues without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities’ (2018) 82(S1) Political Opinion Quarterly 866. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. ‘Cognitive biases, why do we swallow the misinformation bait?’ (mSchools, 3 July 2022) https://mschools.com/cognitive-biaseswhy-do-we-swallow-the-misinformation-bait/ accessed 22 November 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. Gabriel R Sanchez and Keesha Middlemass, ‘Misinformation Is Eroding the Public’s Confidence in Democracy’ (Brookings, 26 July 2022) https://www.brookings.edu/articles/misinformation-is-eroding-the-publics-confidence-in-democracy/ accessed 22 November 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. Branko Milanovic, Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization (Harvard University Press 2016). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. Jennifer McCoy, Tahmina Rahman and Mura Somer, ‘Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities’ (2018) 62(1) American Behavioral Scientist 16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Pew Research Center, The Public, the Political System and American Democracy (26 April 2018) https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/04/26/the-public-the-political-system-and-american-democracy/ accessed 22 November 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Amy Mitchell, Jeffrey Gottfried, Galen Stocking, Mason Walker and Sophia Fedeli, Many Americans Say Made-Up News Is a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. Critical Problem that Needs to Be Fixed (Pew Research Center, 5 June 2019) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.