The Moderating Effect of Ethical Behavior on the Relationship Between Leadership Skills and Employee Engagement

Authors

Jayfe Jade B. Cipriano

University of Mindanao (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700950

Subject Category: Leadership

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 13918-13943

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-02

Accepted: 2026-08-07

Published: 2026-08-18

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between leadership skills, ethical behavior, and employee engagement among Local Government Unit (LGU) employees in Maramag, Bukidnon. Specifically, it aimed to determine the levels of leadership skills, ethical behavior, and employee engagement, assess the significant relationships among these variables, and test whether ethical behavior moderates the relationship between leadership skills and employee engagement. A quantitative, descriptive-correlational research design was utilized. Data were collected from 204 employees performing administrative or supervisory functions using validated survey instruments. Statistical tools such as mean, standard deviation, Pearson product-moment correlation, and regression analysis were employed. Findings revealed that leadership skills and employee engagement were generally high, while ethical behavior was very high among respondents. Significant positive relationships were found between leadership skills and employee engagement, leadership skills and ethical behavior, and ethical behavior and employee engagement. However, moderation analysis indicated that ethical behavior did not significantly moderate the relationship between leadership skills and employee engagement, suggesting that these variables independently influence employee engagement. The study highlights the importance of strengthening both leadership practices and ethical standards within LGUs to enhance employee engagement and organizational performance. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and administrators in promoting effective governance, ethical conduct, and employee well-being in the public sector.

Keywords

leadership skills, ethical behavior, employee engagement, local government unit, Philippines

Downloads

References

1. Ababneh, O. M. A. (2021). How do green HRM practices affect employee engagement? The mediating role of psychological ownership. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 43(2), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2020-0067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alfes, K., Shantz, A. D., & Bailey, C. (2020). The relationship between perceived autonomy and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 33(1), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. \Anand, S., & Winters, M. (2022). Diversity, equity, and inclusion: A framework for fostering employee engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 137-152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., & Guler, C. E. (2021). A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(2), 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101379 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2021). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2625-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cavazotte, F., Moreno, V., & Hickman, M. (2020). Moral intelligence and leadership: A systematic review. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 27(2), 141-155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, Y., Tang, G., Jin, J., Xie, Q., & Li, J. (2022). Linking ethical leadership to employee engagement: The roles of psychological safety and moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04877-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuit: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2011). Burnout and work engagement: New perspectives. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(3), 303-315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (2020). Perceived organizational support and employee engagement: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(1), 1-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Elicker, J. D., Foust, M. S., & Hall, E. (2020). Feedback and recognition: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(1), 37-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fletcher, L., & Schofield, K. (2021). Facilitating meaningful work: The role of HR practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(13), 2815–2840. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1674351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hassan, S., Wright, B. E., & Yukl, G. (2022). Does ethical leadership matter in government? Effects on organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and employee engagement. Public Administration Review, 82(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hoffman, B. J., Bynum, B. H., Piccolo, R. F., & Sutton, A. M. (2020). The effects of leadership on organizational culture and climate. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 27(1), 5-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kaptein, M. (2022). The effectiveness of ethics programs: The role of scope, composition, and sequence. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2296-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Karatepe, O. M., Rezapouraghdam, H., & Hassannia, R. (2022). Job insecurity, work engagement and performance outcomes. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(2), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2021-0491 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kim, M., & Koo, D. W. (2022). Linking leadership styles to employee engagement: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Sustainability, 14(3), 1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031350 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kulikowski, K. (2021). One, two or three dimensions of work engagement? Testing the factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) on a Polish sample. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 34(3), 331–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lee, M. C. C., Idris, M. A., & Tuckey, M. (2021). Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development International, 24(5), 569–588. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1790894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Xu, L. (2022). Servant leadership, trust, and the organizational commitment of public sector employees. Public Administration, 100(2), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12754 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mostafa, A. M. S., & El-Motalib, E. A. (2022). Ethical leadership, work meaningfulness, and work engagement: The mediating role of person–organization fit. Journal of Management Development, 41(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-08-2021-0201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2020). Burnout: A multidimensional perspective. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of work and organizational psychology (pp. 355-376). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Newman, A., Round, H., Bhattacharya, S., & Roy, A. (2021). Ethical climates and employee engagement: A review and future research agenda. Business Ethics: A European Review, 30(3), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12339 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Newman, A., Round, H., & Wang, D. (2022). Authentic leadership and employee engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 29(1), 34-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nishii, L. H., & Leroy, H. (2022). Inclusive cultures and employee engagement: A systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 153-170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2021). The roles of transparency and trust in whistle blowing. Public Personnel Management, 50(2), 203–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020917690 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Santoso, P. B. (2021). The effect of leadership style and organizational culture on job satisfaction and employee performance. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 2(4), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Round, H., Newman, A., & Wang, D. (2023). Psychological safety and employee engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 36(1), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Saks, A. M. (2022). Caring human resources management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tisu, L., Lupșa, D., Vîrgă, D., & Rusu, A. (2021). Personality characteristics, job performance and mental health: The mediating role of work engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Wang, D., Xu, X., & Wang, X. (2023). Servant leadership and employee engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(2), 257-273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Yukl, G. (2020). How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 27(1), 5-18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles