The Personality–Disengagement Nexus: How Individual Differences Shape Employee Disengagement in the Banking Sector

Authors

Oluwole Festus OGUNLEYE

Social Development Department, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo, Ondo State (Nigeria)

Itunu OLU-OGUNLEYE

Human Resource Department, Elizade University, Ilara-Mokin Ondo State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900021

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 366-378

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-13

Accepted: 2026-09-18

Published: 2026-09-28

Abstract

Employee disengagement has become an important organisational concern, particularly in the banking sector, where demanding workloads, performance expectations, and continuous organisational changes can influence employees’ willingness to remain psychologically involved in their work. This study examined the relationship between personality traits and employee disengagement in the banking sector, focusing on the Big Five personality dimensions of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience. The study was anchored on the Big Five Personality Theory and adopted a positivist philosophy and quantitative research approach. A cross-sectional survey design was employed, with data collected from 398 bank employees through a structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26, employing descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression. The study highlights the role of individual differences in shaping employees’ responses to workplace demands and their likelihood of experiencing disengagement. The findings indicate that personality traits provide useful insights into variations in employee disengagement, with positive personality characteristics generally associated with greater work involvement, while neuroticism is associated with greater vulnerability to withdrawal and disengagement. The study concludes that understanding personality differences can complement organisational approaches to managing disengagement. It recommends that banking organisations consider individual personality characteristics in employee recruitment, placement, development, and engagement strategies to foster sustained employee involvement and organisational effectiveness.

Keywords

Banking sector, employee disengagement, employee involvement, individual differences

Downloads

References

1. Atiq, A. A., Sullman, M. J. M., Apostolou, M., & Lajunen, T. (2026). The psychological architecture of employee disengagement: A structural model of the antecedents and behavioral outcomes of quiet quitting. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1813041. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1813041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bernuzzi, C., Paganin, G., Petrilli, S., & Margheritti, S. (2025). Old trends in new clothing? Exploring the quiet quitting phenomenon through a scoping review. Current Psychology, 44, 10990–11010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07920-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cesaro, E., & Daicampi, C. (2026). Quiet quitting in the healthcare workforce: A systematic review of organisational drivers and managerial implications. Journal of Nursing Management. https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/7319117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Deniz, S., Eroğlu, H., & Koç, H. (2025). Examination of the relationship between Big Five personality traits and quiet quitting behavior from the perspective of hotel employees. Journal of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 13(4), 4311–4338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fuzi, N. M., & Baki, N. U. (2025). Understanding turnover intentions in the financial services sector: A systematic review of the quit mindset. SAGE Open. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Islam, M. A., Somu, S., & Karatepe, O. M. (2026). Antecedents and consequences of quiet quitting: A systematic literature review. The Service Industries Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2026.2650783 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jimoh, A. L. (2025). The effect of employee engagement and job satisfaction on job performance: The role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Management Development, 44(5), 700–710. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kaushik, S., Khera, A., & Atri, T. (2025). Impact of organisational silence on employee engagement among banking sector employees. European Economic Letters, 15(2), 984–990. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kenku, A. A., & Adeyemi, A. O. (2025). Exploring the influence of personality traits and socio-demographic factors on occupational stress among bank workers in Abuja, Nigeria. Ife Social Sciences Review, 33(2), 98–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Narayanasami, S., Joseph, M. S., & Parayitam, S. (2024). Disentangling the relationship between Big-Five personality characteristics and work engagement: Evidence from India. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1), 2124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rahman, H., Singh, T., & Mandal, M. (2025). The dark silence: Dark triad personality traits as predictors of quiet quitting intention. Acta Psychologica, 261, 105860. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sounding the silence: Examining the antecedents and outcomes of quiet quitting. (2026). International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 34(1), 165–184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Soyalın, M. (2025). The impact of abusive supervision on quiet quitting: The moderating role of conscientiousness personality trait. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies, 7(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.47103/bilturk.1629246 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles