The Practice Method as a Determinant of Accounting Learning Achievement Among Senior High School Students

Authors

Yohanes Bahari

Faculty of Education and Teaching, Tanjungpura University in Pontianak, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Junaidi Matsum

Faculty of Education and Teaching, Tanjungpura University in Pontianak, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100283

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 3624-3632

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-10

Accepted: 2025-11-20

Published: 2025-12-08

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the practice method as a determinant of accounting learning achievement among senior high school students. Specifically, this research addresses three main objectives: (1) To compare the implementation of the practice method against conventional methods (i.e., lecture and question-and-answer), (2) To identify the differences in accounting learning achievement resulting from these two methods, and (3) To determine the effectiveness of the practice method in enhancing student learning outcomes compared to the conventional approach.
This study employed an experimental method utilizing a randomized control group pretest-posttest design. The research was conducted at SMA Negeri 2 Sungai Kakap, Kubu Raya Regency, involving a sample of 56 12th-grade Social Sciences students selected via cluster sampling. Data were collected through direct observation and document analysis, and subsequently analyzed using descriptive statistics (percentages) and an inferential t-test.
The findings revealed that the practice method was significantly more effective than the conventional method in improving accounting learning outcomes. Students in the experimental group (practice method) demonstrated greater improvement in test scores and a more significant reduction in the number of low-achieving students compared to the control group (conventional method). Therefore, the practice method serves as a key factor in enhancing the accounting learning success of senior high school students.

Keywords

Accounting Learning Achievement and Practice Method

Downloads

References

1. Bahari Yohanes and Matsum Junaidi H, 2025, The Practice Method as A Determinant of Accounting Learning Achievement Among Senior High School Students, FKIP UNTAN Pontianak, Research Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bazani, C. L., & Santos, T. (2023). Contributions of active learning methodologies in accounting: An integrative review. Journal of Accounting Education, 25(3), 895–910. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/2352/235277744007/html/?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Fidelity, A., & Lloyd, S. (2022). Mastery learning and its impact on secondary students’ achievement: A systematic review. Educational Review, 74(3), 456–474. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hamdani, L., Laksmi, N., & Hardinto, R. (2021). Learning methods for accounting students: Explore the effectiveness of traditional learning and laptop based active learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi, 18(2), 205–220. https://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jurnalakundanbisnis/article/view/4409/4319?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hajar, N. I., Dahlan, J., & Hajar, K. I. (2024). Understanding the students’ learning style to enhance the effectiveness of learning method: A study on accounting students. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 25(3), 895–910. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai/article/download/22685/pdf/88801?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kani, M., Rahmawati, H., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Mastery-based learning to improve student procedural performance in vocational accounting education. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15(2), 112–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kimmel, P. D., Weygandt, J. J., & Kieso, D. E. (2018). Accounting: Tools for business decision making. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Li, W., & Xu, J. (2022). Deliberate practice as a predictor of procedural accuracy in quantitative subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1234–1248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mahmood, Z., & Khalid, R. (2021). Experiential learning and student performance in business problem-solving: An empirical assessment. Journal of Experiential Education, 44(4), 403–420. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Natawijaya, R. (2016). Pengolahan data secara statistik. Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan UPI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ngalimun. (2016). Strategi dan model pembelajaran. Aswaja Presindo. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nguyen, T. M., & Phan, T. G. (2023). Experiential learning in accounting simulations: Effects on engagement and conceptual mastery. Journal of Accounting Education, 62, 100842. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rajeevan. S, 2020, Accounting: The Teaching, The Practice and What is Missing?, VILAKSHAN- XIMB Journal of Management, Vol 17, Issue 1-2, https://www.emerald.com/xjm/article/17/1-2/15/387907/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rusman. (2016). Model-model pembelajaran. Rajawali Pers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Santos, R., & Oliveira, D. (2024). Deliberate practice in accounting education: Improving accuracy through structured repetition. Accounting Education Review, 33(1), 47–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Slameto. (2016). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. PT Rineka Cipta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Syafi’i, A. (2018). Studi tentang prestasi belajar siswa dalam aspek dan faktor yang mempengaruhi. Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, 2(2), 155–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Suhendah, R., Putra, A., & Lestari, D. (2024). The effect of drill method on accounting learning outcomes in senior high school students. Journal of Accounting Education, 18(1), 45–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Thottoli M.M, Islam Aminul Md, Abdullah A.B.M, Hasan Sharif Md and Ibrahim Suraiya (2024), Enricher learning: Bridging the gap between academics and practicing accounting professionals, Journal of Education for Business, Vol 99 Issue 5, Taylor and Francis online, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles