The Relationship between Work Environment and Job Satisfaction of Administrative Staff in Open and Distributed Learning Centres

Authors

Mohd Fakardian Che Rus

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Open University Malaysia (Malaysia)

Wong Huey Siew

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Open University Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1017PSY0030

Subject Category: Psychology

Volume/Issue: 10/17 | Page No: 419-433

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-03

Accepted: 2026-05-08

Published: 2026-05-30

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between work environment and job satisfaction among administrative staff in Open Distance Learning (ODL) Learning Centres, utilizing Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory as a guiding framework. A positive working environment is crucial for maintaining employee productivity, fostering morale, and minimizing stress that negatively impacts work performance, all of which are vital for efficient support to ODL students and educators. The study focused on five specific dimensions of the work environment: job autonomy, job competency, collegial relationships, career commitment, and status of profession. A quantitative survey design was employed, with questionnaires distributed to 100 administrative staff members across various ODL Learning Centres in Malaysia. A total of 69 completed responses were received and analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) and Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient. The findings reveal that administrative staff generally perceive their work environment positively, with job competency, status of profession, and job autonomy scoring highest. The overall level of job satisfaction among the staff was also found to be satisfactory. Crucially, the results indicate a significant positive correlation between all examined dimensions of the work environment and job satisfaction. Specifically, job autonomy showed the strongest relationship with job satisfaction, followed by status of profession and career commitment. This study confirms the importance of a conducive work environment in enhancing job satisfaction among ODL administrative staff. The findings offer valuable insights for ODL's management and human resource department, informing the development of policies and practices aimed at fostering a positive work environment to improve employee motivation, engagement, and ultimately, organizational success in expanding educational opportunities for students and supporting educators in a distributed learning environment.

Keywords

Work Environment; Job Satisfaction; Open Distance Learning (ODL); Administrative Staff

Downloads

References

1. Agbozo, G. K., Owusu, I. S., Hoedoafia, M. A., & Atakorah, Y. B. (2017). The effect of work environment on job satisfaction: Evidence from the banking sector in Ghana. Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(1), 12-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alwin, D. F. (2014). Investigating response errors in survey data. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(1), 3-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anjum, A., Ming, X., Siddiqi, A. F., & Rasool, S. (2018). An empirical study analyzing job productivity. Journal of Management Development, 37(5), 458-477. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Basiruddin, R., Basiruddin, N. A., Mokhber, M., Rasid, S. Z. A., & Zamil, A. H. M. (2016). The influence of human resource management practices on job satisfaction among employees in Malaysian private higher education. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 558-566. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Betzler, F., & Loschke, M. (2021). Wellbeing and job satisfaction in open-plan offices: The role of the perceived ability to cope with distraction. PLoS ONE, 16(1), e0245386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dompelade, G. J., Khadijah, S., Rumawas, W., & Uhing, Y. (2019). The influence of work environment and compensation on job satisfaction of non-academic employees. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(5), 653-662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Heydary, M. T., Kareshki, H., & Armat, M. R. (2016). Relationship between staff competency and job satisfaction among employees of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2014. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 15(9), 597-605. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Irwan. (2018). Herzberg’s theory of motivational hygiene: Is it relevant to explore the factors causing dissatisfaction among government employees. International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, 6(7), 11-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kabeel, S., & Eisa, W. (2017). The relationship between professional identity, job satisfaction, professional commitment and turnover intention among health information management professionals in Egypt. Journal of Health Management, 19(4), 570-584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kultalahti, J., & Viitala, J. (2014). Sufficient challenges and a balancing act: Constructing job satisfaction from job demands and resources. Vocations and Learning, 7(1), 61-79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Leach, L. S., Polite, F. G., & Taylor, N. A. (2003). Social support, job autonomy, job satisfaction and absenteeism. Work & Stress, 17(1), 85-96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mathieu, J. E., & Baikal, R. (2016). Drivers and consequences of job satisfaction for performance at the organizational, workgroup, and individual levels. In P. E. Spector (Ed.), Job satisfaction: From theory to practice (pp. 225-255). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Raziq, A., & Maulabakhsh, R. (2015). Impact of working environment on job satisfaction. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 717-723. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Redmond, G. M. (2015). The relationship between career commitment and job satisfaction among community college student support service staff. (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Dakota). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Salunke, S. (2015). A study on impact of work environment on employee satisfaction. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 4(9), 239-242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shukla, T., & Singh, S. (2016). Job satisfaction and affective commitment among public and private sector employees. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(6), 171-181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Teoh, K. R. H., Coyne, I., Devonish, D., Leather, P., & Zarola, A. (2016). Collegial relationships, collective efficacy, and occupational well-being among nurses: Testing a social resources model. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 60, 11-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Unlucan, D. (2013). Theory X and Theory Y type leadership and their impact on organizational culture within Turkish primary schools. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 1279-1285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Health Organization. (2014). Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles