The Research-Minded Educator: Bridging Practice and Inquiry -Cultivating Evidence-Based Classroom Practice and Practitioner Research Skills.

Authors

Dr. Sarath Perera

Lyceum Campus (Sri Lanka)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100453

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 5825-5830

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-20

Accepted: 2026-01-26

Published: 2026-02-12

Abstract

Teaching has evolved from being viewed as a craft to being recognized as an intellectually demanding profession grounded in evidence and reflective inquiry. In this context, educators are increasingly encouraged to adopt a research-minded approach—one that fuses classroom practice with systematic investigation and critical analysis (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 2009). The 21st-century classroom, characterized by diversity, digitalization, and accountability pressures, demands that teachers make pedagogical decisions supported by credible data rather than intuition or tradition (Brown, 2020). Consequently, the integration of research into everyday teaching has become a professional imperative. However, the word research seems to be a fear psycosis or another burden for many teachers in the Sri lankan education system which then become a barrier for them to actively contribute to the education system . According to writer’s first hand experience having more 35 years experience being in the field of teacher education observes that doing research by majority of teachers in the primary schools limits to fulfil the requirement of a study program, or obtain a salary increments or to have a promotion to which many does not have access. Therefore, teachers demonstrate them as consumer than producer in general.

Keywords

Research-Minded, Educator, Bridging, Practice and Inquiry

Downloads

References

1. Borg, S. (2013). Teacher research in language teaching: A critical analysis. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brown, C. (2020). The networked school leader: How to improve teaching and student outcomes using learning networks. Emerald. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brown, C., & Zhang, D. (2022). Evidence-informed school improvement: A cross-national perspective. Educational Research Review, 35(4), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100465 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cain, T. (2015). Teachers’ engagement with research texts: Beyond instrumental, conceptual, and strategic use. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(5), 478–492. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1105536 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cain, T., & Allan, D. (2017). The invisible impact of educational research. Oxford Review of Education, 43(6), 718–732. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cordingley, P. (2019). Using research evidence in education: From the school’s perspective. Educational Research, 61(1), 69–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2019). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research (4th ed.). Corwin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hargreaves, D. H. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. Teacher Training Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lewis, C. (2016). Lesson study in North America: Progress and challenges. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 653–665. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Murray, J., & Kosnik, C. (2019). Teacher educators as researchers: Inquiry, evidence, and impact. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Slavin, R. E. (2020). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (13th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2017). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Educational Change, 8(2), 221–258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Timperley, H. (2014). Using evidence in the classroom for professional learning. Australian Council for Educational Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. William, D. (2018). Embedded formative assessment (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles