The Rise of the Gig Economy and Its Implications for Organizational Structures and Leadership

Authors

Ahmad Faiz Mohd Ezanee

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Nomahaza Mahadi

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Siti Azreen Habeeb Rahuman

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100463

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 5882-5888

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-04

Accepted: 2025-12-10

Published: 2025-12-18

Abstract

The gig economy is changing the way organisations work, and the shift is becoming too significant to ignore. This paper explores how the rise of flexible and independent work arrangements is reshaping leadership approaches and traditional organisational structures. The discussion looks at how technology, worker expectations, and market demands have opened the door for project-based work that gives people more freedom but also brings new challenges for businesses. Using Self Determination Theory as a guide, the paper highlights how autonomy, competence, and a sense of connection are important in keeping gig workers motivated, especially when they operate with limited security and little attachment to one employer. The review of recent literature shows a mix of opportunities and concerns. There is potential for organisations to gain more agility and access to specialised skills, but there are also issues linked to regulation, wellbeing, and fair treatment. This paper concludes that organisations need to adapt by rethinking leadership styles, strengthening collaboration between mixed workforces, and investing in continuous learning for everyone involved. Those willing to adjust and embrace the reality of gig work will be better prepared for the future of employment.

Keywords

Gig economy, organisational structure, leadership

Downloads

References

1. Agrawal, D., & Bhukya, R. (2022). Effects of the gig economy on the workplace: A contemporary Indian perspective study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 2701–2718. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ashford, S. J., Caza, B. B., & Reid, E. M. (2018). From surviving to thriving in the gig economy: A research agenda for individuals in the new world of work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barley, S. R., Bechky, B. A., & Milliken, F. J. (2017). The changing nature of work: Careers, identities, and work lives in the 21st century. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3(2), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2017.0034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bellesia, F., Mattarelli, E., Bertolotti, F., & Sobrero, M. (2019). Platforms as entrepreneurial incubators? How online labor markets shape work identity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(4), 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0269 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Best, S. (2017). The U.S. gig economy: Economic imposition or economic choice? Business and Management Review, 8(4), 60–67. https://cberuk.com/cdn/conference_proceedings/conference_93744.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bimman, A. (2019, August 9). Push to unionize Foodora could be “watershed moment” for Canadian gig economy: Employment lawyer. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/5746926/foodora-union-drive/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bucher, E., Fieseler, C., & Lutz, C. (2019). Mattering in digital labor. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Butler, N., & Stoyanova Russell, D. (2018). No funny business: Precarious work and emotional labour in stand-up comedy. Human Relations, 71(12), 1666–1686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718754999 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Caza, A. (2020). The gig economy’s implications for management education. Journal of Management Education, 44(5), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920934150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Donovan, S., Bradley, D., & Shimabukuro, J. (2016). What does the gig economy mean for workers? Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44365.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2019). Algorithmic management and app‐work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gonzales, R. (2019, September 18). California governor signs law protecting gig economy workers. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2019/09/18/762108954/california-governor-signs-law-protecting-gig-economy-workers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Grandey, A. A., & Gabriel, A. S. (2015). Emotional labor at a crossroads: Where do we go from here? Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kaine, S., & Josserand, E. (2019). The organisation and experience of work in the gig economy. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619865480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Keith, M. G., Harms, P., & Tay, L. (2019). Mechanical Turk and the gig economy: Exploring differences between gig workers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(4), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0228 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Malin, B. J., & Chandler, C. (2017). Free to work anxiously: Splintering precarity among drivers for Uber and Lyft. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10(2), 382–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Minifie, J., & Wiltshire, T. (2016). Peer to peer pressure: Policy for the sharing economy (Report No. 2016–7). Grattan Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2019). Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 124–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218759646 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Prudential. (2018). Gig economy impact by generation. Prudential Insurance Company of America. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Scully-Russ, E., & Torraco, R. (2020). The changing nature and organization of work: An integrative review of the literature. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 66–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319886394 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Spreitzer, G. M., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Thomas, S. M., & Baddipudi, V. (2022). Changing nature of work and employment in the gig economy: The role of culture building and leadership in sustaining commitment and job satisfaction. NHRD Network Journal, 15(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/26314541211064735 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tucker, P., & Folkard, S. (2012). Working time, health and safety (Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 31). International Labour Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tug, M. A., & Başar, P. (2023). Future of the gig economy. PressAcademia Procedia, 17(1), 230–231. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1796 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. https://www.bls.gov/cps/electronically-mediated-employment.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Whyte, W. H. (1956). The organization man. Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles