The Role of Inquiry-Based Learning in Developing Digital Literacy in Social Studies Subjects of HUMSS students in Tanauan Institute Inc.

Authors

Araja, Chescky R.

Tanauan Institute Inc. (Philippines)

De Guzman, Raine Celine M.

Tanauan Institute Inc. (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500293

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 4325-4366

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-28

Accepted: 2026-05-04

Published: 2026-05-29

Abstract

This chapter includes the introduction, theoretical framework, paradigm of the study, statement of the problem, hypothesis, scope and limitation, significance of the study, and the definition of terms used.
In the modern educational landscape, the integration of digital literacy has become increasingly vital across various subjects, especially in social studies. Digital literacy is not merely the ability to use technological tools but encompasses critical thinking, evaluating online information, and utilizing digital platforms for effective communication and research. As students navigate the complexities of a digitally-driven society, it is essential to equip them with these skills. One pedagogical approach that has shown promise in fostering digital literacy is inquiry-based learning (IBL). IBL encourages students to explore questions, engage in critical thinking, and independently seek out information, making it an ideal framework for teaching digital literacy within social studies.

Keywords

N/A

Downloads

References

1. Aghazadeh, S. (2020). Inquiry-based Learning and its Impact on Teaching and Learning of the Humanities. (NIE Working Paper Series No. 19). Singapore: National Institute of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Antonio, R.P. & Prudente M.S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 12(1), 251-281. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aparicio-Ting, F. E., Slater, D. M., & Kurz, E. U. (2019). Inquiry-based learning (IBL) as a driver of curriculum: A staged approach. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching: Proceedings of the University of Calgary Conference on Learning and Teaching, 3, 44-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ash, Doris & Kluger-Bell, Barry (2017). Identifying inquiry in the k-5 classroom. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2000/nsf99148/ch_10.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bravo, M.C.M., Chalezquer, C.S., Serrano-Puche, J. (2021). Meta-framework of digital literacy: A comparative analysis of 21st-century skills frameworks. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 79: 76-109. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1508 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Buchanan, S. M. C., Harlan, M. A., Bruce, C., & Edwards, S. (2016). Inquiry based learning models, information literacy, and student engagement: A literature review. School Libraries Worldwide, 22(2), 23-39. doi: 10.14265.22.2.03 Article. Retrieved from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/222587/3/102823.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Byker, C., Harden, G., Heafner, B., & Holzberg. (2017). Hoping to teach someday? Inquire within: examining inquiry-based learning with first-semester undergrads. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education., 8(2), 54–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Canuto (2022). Cultivating Communities of Inquiry for Filipino Students as Deliberative Citizens, University of the Philippines. Retrived from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1352296.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Carrasco, C. G., & Martnez, P. M. (2016). Historical skills in compulsory education: Assessment, inquiry-based strategies and students' argumentation. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(2), 130–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. CELDA (2023). 20th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED636456.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cents-Boonstra et al.(2020). Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: an observation study of teacher and student behaviours. Res. Pap. Educ. 2020; 36(6): 754–779. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Çepni, S., & Ayvacı, H.Ş. (2016). Sample activities for the new science curriculum. S. Çepni (Ed.), Science and technology teaching from theory to practice (13. Ed.) inc. (s. 457-474). Pegem Academy Publishing. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002179 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chin and Osborne (2015). Role of Questioning in Inquiry-Based Learning. Retrieved from :https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2631317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2019). The importance of behavioral engagement in the classroom. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108654557.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-981-10-2481-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dimaunahan, J., & Panoy, J. F. (2021). Academic Motivation and Self-Efficacy in Technical Skills as Correlates to Academic Performance. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(4), 72-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Discipulo, LG. & Bautista, RG. (2022). Students’ cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies towards hands-on science. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(2), 658-664. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. DQ Global Standards. (2019). World’s first global standard for digital literacy, skills and readiness launched by the Coalition for Digital Intelligence. Retrieved from: https://www.dqinstitute.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Duban, N. (2017). Inquiry-based learning approach. Ş.S. Anagün & N. Duban (Eds.). Sciencxe Education inc. (pp. 221-240). Pegem Academy Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Farsawang, P., & Songkram, N. (2022, March 8-11). International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics, IIIC. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.54808/ICSIT2022.01.91 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2018). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Goldston, M. J., Day, J. B., Sundberg, C., & Dantzler, J. (2015). Psychometric analysis of a 5E learning cycle lesson plan assessment instrument. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 633–648. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1241559.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Grant, S. G., Swan, K., & Lee, J. (2017). Inquiry-based practice in social studies education: Understanding the inquiry design model. New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Greene, J. P., Benjamin, M., & Hinchman, K. (2018). The impact of student engagement on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 111(3), 371-379. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.141937 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gródek-Szostak, Z. , Suder, M., Piechaczek, A., Siguencia, L.O. (2021). Assessment and Comparison of Digital Competences in Education for Selected European Countries. European Research Studies Journal, 24(1), pp. 348-361. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Gu et al. (2015). Inquiry-Based Learning: Student Teachers’ Challenges and Perceptions. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1241559.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Guido, M. (2017). Inquiry-Based Learning Definition, Benefits & Strategies. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1241559.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Gutierez (2020). Collaborative professional learning through lesson study: Identifying the challenges of inquiry-based teaching. Retrieved from: https://www.iier.org.au/iier25/gutierez.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hagglund (2022). The Inquiry Based Approach in Social Studies Classrooms and How They Support Student Engagement, Buy-In, and Performance. Retrieved from: https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/xg94hv870 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hague, C. & Payton, S. (2021). Digital literacy across the curriculum: a Futurelab handbook. The National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Harlen, W. (2017). Inquiry-based learning in science and mathematics. Review of science, mathematics and ICT education, 7(2), 9-33. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1241559.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Hess and McAvoy (2017). The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education Philosophical Inquiry in Education, Volume 24 (2017), No. 3, pp. 282–285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2016). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56, 1023-1031. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1241559.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Javier, B. F. (2020). Practices of Filipino public high school teachers on digital teaching and learning technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic: Basis for learning action cell sessions. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, accepted version. doi: 10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.67 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Jong, M. S. Y. (2017). Empowering students in the process of social inquiry learning. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 306–322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Kao, P., & Chang, H. (2019). THE EFFECTS OF CRITIQUE DRIVEN INQUIRY INTERVENTION ON STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING AND SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY COMPETENCY. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1278183.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Kidman, G., & Casinader, N. (2017). Inquiry-based teaching and learning across disciplines: Comparative theory and practice in schools. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Koh, E., & Chai, C. S. (2016). Developing Critical Thinking through Questioning. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 150–162. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1210303.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Kristen Corsetto. (2023). Inquiry-Based Learning to Boost Student Engagement. n2y. Retrieved from: https://www.n2y.com/blog/inquiry-based-learning/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Lee, Y. H. (2016). Inquiry-based teaching in second and foreign language pedagogy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(6), 1236–1244 Academy Publisher Manufactured in Finland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Levitt (2020). Questions that Compel and Support. https://www.socialstudies.org/system/files/publications/articles/se_8104200.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Lin, C. H., & Lien, Y. C. (2021). Inquiry-based learning for enhancing students’ critical thinking and communication skills: A quasi-experimental study. Education Sciences, 11(3), 94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Lucman, S. T. (2020). Developing social justice skills through community service-learning in high school social studies. The Councilor: A Journal of the Social Studies, 81(2), 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Maheshwari, G. (2021). Factors affecting students’ intentions to undertake online learning: An empirical study in Vietnam. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6629-6649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021- 10465-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Malicdem, R. S., & Perez, J. C. (2018). Enhancing the application skills of Filipino college students through simulation-based learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(4), 490-503. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1437227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Marañon, R. B., Ragasa, C. Y., & Rodriguez, E. B. (2019). Inquiry-based learning approach in developing analytical skills among Grade 10 students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(3), 18-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. National Council for the Social Studies. (2019). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Silver Spring, MD: NCSS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Niu, L., Guo, Q., & Li, X. (2020). Inquiry-Based Learning in mathematics: A synthesis of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(7), 1283-1302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Öztürk, B., Kaya, M., & Demir, M. (2022). Does inquiry-based learning model improve learning outcomes? A second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(4), 201-216. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1408841.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Pak et al.(2020). The Adaptive Challenges of Curriculum Implementation: Insights for Educational Leaders Driving Standards-Based Reform. AERA Open. 2020; 6(2): 233285842093282. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Qablan et. Al. ( 2024). Inquiry-Based Learning: Encouraging Exploration and Curiosity in the Classroom. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379404297_ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Rahmi et. Al. (2019). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through inquiry-based learning model. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019; 1317(1): 012193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Rarugal, C. R., Alcala, L. R., & Yazon, E. C. (2018). Analytical thinking skills of Filipino high school students in chemistry. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(2), Article 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Sari, R. D., Hidayah, I. N., & Lestari, E. S. (2019). Enhancing engagement and critical thinking skills through inquiry-based learning in biology education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 80-92. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10269a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Saye and Brush (2016), Three Social Studies Teacher Design and use of Inquiry models. Retrieved from: https://citejournal.org/volume-17/issue-3-17/social-studies/three-social-studies-teachers-design-and-use-of-inquiry modules/#:~:text=Saye%20and%20Brush%20(2006)%20have,led%20inquiry%20as%20they%20expected. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. School of Education (2020). Digital Literacy in the Classroom: Benefits, Challenges, and Impact on Learning Retrieved from: https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/digital-literacy-in-the-classroom/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Shih, J. L., Chuang, C. W., & Hwang, G. J. (2019). An inquiry-based mobile learning approach to enhancing social science learning effectiveness. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 50-60 https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.4.50 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Smith, L. & Morrison, T. (2018). Inquiry-Based Tasks in Social Studies. https://www.edutopia.org/article/inquiry-based-tasks-social-studies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. UNESCO (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2 Retrieved from: https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacy-skills-2018-en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Voet. (2016). History teachers’ conceptions of inquiry-based learning, beliefs about the nature of history, and their relation to the classroom context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 57–67. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.12.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Westbrook, S., & Sievert, A. (2021). National Council for the Social Studies Retrieved from: https://www.socialstudies.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2018). Self- regulated learning and performance: An introduction and overview. In B. J. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles