The Role of Leadership in Group Cohesiveness of SHGS: A Study in West Bengal

Self-Help Groups (SHGs) have emerged as important instruments of women empowerment, entrepreneurship development, and rural socio-economic transformation in India. While several studies have focused on the financial dimensions of SHGs, comparatively less attention has been given to the role of internal social dynamics such as group cohesiveness and leadership. The present study examines the impact of leadership style on group cohesiveness among SHGs in North Bengal, India. The study is descriptive in nature and is based on primary data collected from 326 SHG members across the districts of Jalpaiguri and Siliguri Mahakuma Parishad of Darjeeling district through a structured questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale. Multiple regression analysis was employed to analyse the relationship between leadership style and group cohesiveness, along with selected control variables. The findings reveal that leadership style significantly influences group cohesiveness within SHGs. More structured and authoritative leadership styles were found to positively contribute to group unity, coordination, and discipline, whereas excessive laissez-faire leadership weakened cohesiveness. Group vintage and proper maintenance of records were also found to positively influence cohesiveness. The study highlights that effective leadership and strong social bonding are essential for the sustainability of SHGs, successful group income-generating activities, and the broader process of women empowerment and entrepreneurship development in rural India.

Microfinance, Self Help Group, Leadership, Group Leader, Group Cohesiveness

1. APMAS. (2009). Quality and Sustainability of Self-Help Groups in India. Hyderabad: APMAS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Banwo, A. O., Du, J., & Onokala, U. (2015). The Impact of Group Cohesiveness on Organizational Performance: The Nigerian Case. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(6), p146. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v10n6p146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Curto, J. D., & Pinto, J. C. (2011). The corrected VIF (CVIF). Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(7), 1499–1507. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2010.505956 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Datta, S. K., & Raman, M. (2001). Can Heterogenity and Social Cohesion Coexist in Self-Help Groups?: An Evidence from Group Lending in Andhra Pradesh in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(3), 387–400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Garai, S., Mazumder, G., & Maiti, S. (2013). Group Dynamics Effectiveness among Self Help Groups – in West Bengal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Joy, L., Prema, A., & Krishnan, S. (2008). Determinants of group performance of women-led agro-processing self-help groups in Kerala. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.47885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kabeer, N. (2005), Is microfinance a ‘Magic bullet’ for women’s empowerment? Analysis of findings from South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly,40(44/45), 4709-4718. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. NABARD. (2006). Microfinance and Self-Help Groups in India. Mumbai: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Nichols, C. (2021). Self-help groups as platforms for development: The role of social capital. World Development, 146, 105575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105575 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Parida, P. C., & Sinha, A. (2010). Performance and Sustainability of Self-Help Groups in India: A Gender Perspective. Asian Development Review, 27(01), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0116110510500034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and economic growth. American Prospect, 4(13), 35–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Shemwell, J. T., Chase, C. C., & Schwartz, D. L. (2015). Seeking the general explanation: A test of inductive activities for learning and transfer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(1), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Singh, V., & Padhi, P. (2017). Loan demand by microfinance borrowers: Do self-help groups and joint liability groups differ? A case study of Mirzapur district. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(12), 1892–1905. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-02-2016-0066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tannenbaum, R., & Schmidt, W. H. (1973). How to choose a leadership pattern. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Terborg, J. R., Castore, C., & DeNinno, J. A. (1976). A longitudinal field investigation of the impact of group composition on group performance and cohesion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 782–790. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.782 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Understanding Academic Leadership: Theory, Practice and Future Horizons
• A Literature Review on Leadership and Cultural Evolution of Adventism in East Africa Region
• Unlocking Employee Creativity Through Empowering Leadership: The Dynamic Interplay of Trust and Engagement
• The Integration of Preachers’ Leadership Competencies in Empowering Preachers for the Orang Asli Community in Malaysia
• Traditional Authority vs. Legacy Leadership: A Comparative Literature Review from the Arab World