The Role of the Taxation Subject in Shaping Tax Knowledge and Compliance: A Critical Literature Review

The need to enhance voluntary tax compliance is an ever-present international concern for macro-economic stability requiring an unequivocal paradigm change away from punitive deterrents to educational empowerment. This critical evaluation of literature holistically evaluates the multidimensional function of the taxation subject in the formation of multidimensional tax knowledge and subsequent compliance behaviour. The synthesis is grounded on a dual micro-macro theoretical lens, including the Theory of Planned Behaviour for the assessment of individual cognitive constructs, i.e., attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control, and the Slippery Slope Framework for the assessment of macro-environmental institutional trust and systemic fairness. Using the CIMO framework, a PRISMA-inspired screening protocol was applied through January 2026, screening down from 1,024 database records to a carefully filtered sample of 15 central high-impact empirical and experimental studies, and assessing them with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The thematic findings indicate that formal tax education is a significant catalyst in lowering the subjective compliance costs and perceived system complexity. Structured tax pedagogy modulates key psychological mediators to foster an internalised feeling of civic obligation, rather than a simply procedural data transfer. Furthermore, the review challenges the conventional “homogeneous taxpayer” story by showing that compliance results are strongly affected by demographic features, academic disciplines, and digital delivery settings like experiential e-filing portals. In conclusion, the research offers an evidence-based framework for a shift towards collaborative fiscal empowerment, proposing the active and longitudinal integration of contextualised tax curriculum through strategic partnerships between national tax authorities and higher education institutions.

Tax education, Tax compliance, Tax knowledge, Theory of Planned Behaviour, Slippery Slope Framework

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ambrus, R. A., & Borbély, K. (2024). Tax knowledge in connection with tax compliance in Hungary. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(11), 8115. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i11.8115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., & Kelliher, C. F. (2013). Analyzing the role of social norms in tax compliance behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1390-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2017). A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(1), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bornman, M., & Ramutumbu, P. (2019). A conceptual framework of tax knowledge. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(6), 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2018-0379 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chan, C. W., Troutman, C. S., & O’Bryan, D. (2000). An expanded model of taxpayer compliance: Empirical evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 9(2), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(00)00027-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Devos, K. (2014). Factors influencing individual taxpayer compliance behaviour. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7476-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dimitrov, Y., Hristova, V., & Vlaev, I. (2026). Behavioural Insights in Action: Improving Tax Compliance Through Behaviourally Informed Training. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–15. doi:10.1017/bpp.2026.10031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Eriksen, K., & Fallan, L. (1996). Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation: A report on a quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(3), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(96)00015-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gonidakis, F. K., Asonitou, S., Kottara, C., Kavalieraki-Foka, D., & Gkotsina, E. (2024). The contribution of education to the creation of tax awareness and compliance. In A. Kavoura, T. Borges-Tiago, & F. Tiago (Eds.), Strategic innovative marketing and tourism (pp. 571–583). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51038-0_61 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hassan, N., Nawawi, A., & Salin, A. S. A. P. (2016). Improving tax compliance via tax education: Malaysian experience. Malaysian Accounting Review, 15(2), 243–262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hofmann, E., Voracek, M., Bock, C., & Kirchler, E. (2017). Tax compliance across sociodemographic categories: Meta-analyses of survey studies in 111 countries. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.06.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M. C., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018: User guide. McGill University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kogler, C., Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Pantya, J., Belianin, A., & Kirchler, E. (2013). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance: Testing the assumptions of the slippery slope framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania and Russia. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mac, Y. T. H. (2025). Exploring the Links Between Tax Education, Tax Awareness and Tax Compliance Among Students in Vietnam. Economy of Regions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mascagni, et al. (2025). Teach to comply? Evidence from a taxpayer education program in Rwanda. International Tax and Public Finance. (Note: Cited as 2024 and 2025 interchangeably within text sections). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nichita, A., Bătrâncea, L., Pop, C. M., Bătrâncea, I., Morar, I. D., Masca, E., Roux-Cesar, A. M., Forte, D., Formigoni, H., & da Silva, A. A. (2019). We learn not for school but for life: Empirical evidence of the impact of tax literacy on tax compliance. Eastern European Economics, 57(5), 397–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2019.1621183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Tax morale: What drives people and businesses to pay tax? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f3d8ea10-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Torgler, B. (2007). Tax compliance and tax morale: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mat Jusoh, Y. H., Mansor, F. A., Abd Razak, S. N. A., & Wan Mohamad Noor, W. N. B. (2021). The effects of tax knowledge, tax complexity and tax morale towards tax compliance behavior among salaried groups in Malaysia. Advances in Business Research International Journal, 7(2), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.24191/abrij.v7i2.13989 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mascagni, G. (2018). From the lab to the field: A review of tax experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(2), 273–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mascagni, G., Santoro, F., Mukama, D., & Kangave, J. (2024). Measuring tax compliance outcomes: Concepts, indicators and administrative evidence. World Development, 175, 106457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106457 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Muka, T., Glisic, M., Milic, J., Verhoog, S., Bohlius, J., Bramer, W., Chowdhury, R., & Franco, O. H. (2020). A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. European Journal of Epidemiology, 35(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Sanusi, S., Nik Abdullah, N. H., Lim, T. C., Rastam, F., & Rozzani, N. (2021). Tax awareness among students from higher learning institutions in Malaysia: Education area as a moderator. International Journal of Economics and Management, 15(1), 89–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Saad, N. (2014). Tax knowledge, tax complexity and tax compliance: Taxpayers’ view. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1069–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Richardson, G. (2006). Determinants of tax evasion: A cross-country investigation. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.08.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sutrisno, & Setyowati, M. S. (2017). Tax education program for teachers in high schools to enhance voluntary tax compliance. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2017(November Special Issue IETC), 662–670 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Tuo, L., & Han, S. (2024). Does taxation education improve tax compliance: An empirical study. Advances in Taxation, 31, 165–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1058-749720240000031006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Winartati, A. S., & Setyowati, M. S. (2016). Implementation of tax education on elementary school students as an effort to raise tax awareness in Directorate General of Taxes Regional Office for West Java II. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2016(December Special Issue INTE), 1183–1188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Yelman, & İnal. (2025). The Relationship Between Demographic and Academic Characteristics and Tax Awareness and Compliance. Sosyoekonomi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors