The Sacrifice Paradox: Women Entrepreneurs in Small Business

This qualitative study investigates the determinants of success and failure for women-owned small businesses in Selangor, Malaysia. Through in-depth interviews with ten women entrepreneurs, the research explores the interconnected challenges and strategic navigations that define their entrepreneurial journeys. The findings reveal a complex ecosystem where venture outcomes are shaped by a dynamic negotiation between structural constraints and personal agency. Participants identified a Gendered Ecosystem of Constraint, characterized by the double burden of work-family conflict, precarious financial access, and market inequalities, as a primary contributor to venture failure. In response, they mobilize an Inner Fortitude and Drive, founded on psychological capital, passion, and resilience, as a critical counterforce. This internal resource is operationalized through Strategic Navigational Competence, involving calculated risk-taking, customer-centric innovation, and proactive networking. A central paradox emerges, however, in the Gendered Ethic of Sacrifice, where the same exhaustive personal investment lauded as essential for success is also a key driver of burnout. The study concludes that sustainable entrepreneurship for women requires systemic interventions that alleviate structural barriers, moving beyond a model that places the burden of overcoming inequality solely on individual superhuman effort.

Women Entrepreneurship; Small Business; Gender and Work

1. Abd Wahid, N., Abd Aziz, N. N., Ishak, M., & Hussin, A. (2021). The Critical Success Factors of Business Growth among Women Entrepreneurs in Malaysia: A Qualitative Approach. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdullah, W., Zainudin, W., Ismail, S. B., & Zia-Ul-Haq, H. M. (2022). The impact of microfinance services on Malaysian B40 households’ socioeconomic performance: A moderated mediation analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(6), 1983–1996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adam, A., Abdullah, W. R. W., Maruhun, E. N. S., Anwar, I. S. K., & Salin, A. (2022). The resource-based view theory and women microbusiness entrepreneurs: A contribution to business sustainability. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 2915–2932. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Afshan, G., Shahid, S., & Tunio, M. N. (2021). Learning experiences of women entrepreneurs amidst COVID-19. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-09-2020-0153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ahamad, S., Al-jaifi, H. A., & Mostafiz, M. I. (2020). Conceptualizing recourses as antecedents to the economic performance of family-based microenterprise – the moderating role of competencies. Journal of Family Business Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-04-2019-0027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ahl, H., Tillmar, M., Berglund, K., & Pettersson, K. (2023). Entrepreneurship as a losing proposition for women: Gendered outcomes of neo-liberal entrepreneurship policy in a Nordic welfare state. In Women’s Entrepreneurship Policy (pp. 75–102). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781800374652/book-part-9781800374652-12.xml [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ahmed, S., & Sur, S. (2023). Change in the uses pattern of digital banking services by Indian rural MSMEs during demonetization and Covid-19 pandemic-related restrictions. Vilakshan-XIMB Journal of Management, 20(1), 166–192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Aksom, H., & Tymchenko, I. (2020). How institutional theories explain and fail to explain organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1223–1252. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2019-0130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Al Mamun, A., Fazal, S. A., & Muniady, R. (2019). Entrepreneurial knowledge, skills, competencies and performance: A study of micro-enterprises in Kelantan, Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-11-2018-0067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Alhothali, G. T. (2020). Women entrepreneurs doing business from home: Motivational factors of Home-based business in Saudi Arabia. 9(1301), 33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Al-Shami, S., Mamun, A. A., Sidek, S., & Rashid, N. (2019). Causes of failure among Malaysian female entrepreneurs: A qualitative case study of Malaysian microcredit borrowers. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 12(1), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-12-2018-0142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Alshawaf, A. (2020). The use of social networking technologies for home-based online businesses: The case of Saudi Arabian female entrepreneurs [PhD Thesis]. The University of Waikato. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Amjad, S., & Khan, M. Z. (2025). From Mindset to Action: The Interplay of Psychological Capital and Risk-Taking in Women’s Entrepreneurship in Balochistan, Pakistan. Human Systems Management, 44(5), 878–889. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Azis, R. A., Mohamed, N. A., Naseri, R. N. N., Ahmad, A., Abas, N. M., & Ahmad, F. H. M. (2023). Rural women entrepreneurship in Malaysia: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 13(9). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9838/755177c75d50bdb543bfd11f2bc263e4b896.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Aziz, M. S. A., Asmawi, M. Z., & Mahamod, L. H. (2022). Analysing the Rural B40 Society in the Microcredit Programmes of Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM). Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(12), e001886–e001886. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Badzaban, F., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., & Fatemi, M. (2021). Analysing the individual entrepreneurial resilience of rural women. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 11(1), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-021-00290-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Baharudin, M. H., Rusok, N. H. M., Sapiai, N. S., Ghazali, S. A. M., & Salleh, M. S. (2021). Entrepreneurial Competencies and Business Success Among Women Entrepreneurs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Bird, B. (2019). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial competency. In Seminal ideas for the next twenty-five years of advances. Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2022). ‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(2), 424–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage publications. https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/interviews-learning-the-craft-of-qualitative-research-interviewin [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Brush, C. G., Eddleston, K. A., Edelman, L. F., Manolova, T. S., McAdam, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2022). Catalyzing change: Innovation in women’s entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 16(2), 243–254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Brush, C., Greene, P., Balachandra, L., & Davis, A. (2018). The gender gap in venture capital- progress, problems, and perspectives. Venture Capital, 20(2), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2017.1349266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id= 335ZDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT16&dq=Creswell+%26+Creswell+2017+research+design&ots=YExYJLwtnJ&sig=aGDZHqWFUvzETjlHO4S9RNRVwZo [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id= DLbBDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Creswell+%26+Poth+2024+qualitative+inquiry+and+research+design&ots=-is94aITRB&sig=mi2MinM-Zi3b-egc0c6GRYM1Mu8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Economic Census, 2023. (2023). Department of Statistics Malaysia. https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/economic-census--women-owned-statistics [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ekpodilè-Domingo, B. A. (2024). Existentially challenged women entrepreneurs: Resilience to shocks affecting informal small-scale agrifood businesses in Benin [PhD Thesis, Wageningen University and Research]. https://search.proquest.com/openview/ef531770a6c7bf2de4c8344d15d74c65/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Gephart, R. P. (2004). Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2004.14438580 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Global Gender Gap Index. (2024). Malaysia—Global Gender Gap Index 2024 | countryeconomy.com. https://countryeconomy.com/demography/global-gender-gap-index/malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Gódány, Z., Machová, R., Mura, L., & Zsigmond, T. (2021). Entrepreneurship motivation in the 21st century in terms of pull and push factors. TEM Journal, 10(1), 334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Gohar, M., & Abrar, A. (2022). An Exploration of Women Owned Home-based Business Through Institutional Theory Lens: A Case of Peshawar, Pakistan. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Studies, 6(2), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.34260/jaebs.623 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Hansaram, S. K., Hansaram, R., Loy, C. K., Xin, L. Q., Siau, C., Hwee, N. A. M., & May, M. Y. Z. (2022). Examining social media marketing and brand engagement among pre-school parents in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 4(2), 10–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Hassan, S. H., Zeqiri, J., Ramadani, V., Zhen, T. S., Azman, N. H. N., & Mahmud, I. (2020). Individual Factors, Facilitating Conditions and Career Success: Insights from Malaysian Female Entrepreneurs. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 28(04), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495820500168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Hayati, F. A., & Arini, R. E. (2023). Exploring the challenges and opportunities faced by women entrepreneurs in Sukabumi District: A qualitative study. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(05), 77–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Jaim, J. (2021). Does network work? Women business-owners’ access to information regarding financial support from development programme in Bangladesh. Business Strategy & Development, 4(2), 148–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Jalil, M. F., Ali, A., & Kamarulzaman, R. (2023). The influence of psychological capital and social capital on women entrepreneurs’ intentions: The mediating role of attitude. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kabange, M. M., & Simatele, M. (2022). Constraints to formal small business performance in the service sector in Cameroon. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 13(3), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-07-2021-0331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Khursheed, A. (2022). Exploring the role of microfinance in women’s empowerment and entrepreneurial development: A qualitative study. Future Business Journal, 8(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-022-00172-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Kille, T., Wiesner, R., Lee, S.-Y., Johnson Morgan, M., Summers, J., & Davoodian, D. (2022). Capital factors influencing rural, regional and remote women’s entrepreneurship development: An Australian perspective. Sustainability, 14(24), 16442. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Laksmanawati, J., & Yuniawan, A. (2021). Women and the digitalization strategies of micro, small, and medium enterprises in the new normal era. Petra International Journal of Business Studies, 4(1), 55–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. sage. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2oA9aWlNeooC&oi=fnd&pg=PA7&dq=Lincoln+%26+Guba,+1985&ots=0vpySaNfCq&sig=OSJdcIbUuQ21vo73h4UGvmjP-7Q [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Machio, P. M., Kimani, D. N., Kariuki, P. C., Ng’ang’a, A. M., & Njoroge, M. M. (2024). Social Capital and Women’s Empowerment. Forum for Social Economics, 53(3), 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2022.2115526 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Malay Mail. (2024, March 5). HR Ministry aims to raise female workforce participation to 60pc, says minister. Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2024/03/05/hr-ministry-aims-to-raise-female-workforce-participation-to-60pc-says-minister/121632 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Mamun, A. A., Saufi, R. A., Mohiuddin, M., & Fazal, S. A. (2019). Recycling intentions and behaviors among informal micro-entrepreneurs in Kelantan, Malaysia. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 15(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-10-2017-0077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Mitchelmore, S., Rowley, J., & Shiu, E. (2014). Competencies associated with growth of women-led SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(4), 588–601. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2012-0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Moksin, H., Ab Hamid, N. R., Munap, R., & Said, H. (2020). ENHANCING HOME-BASED WOMEN ENTREPRENEUR’S COMPETENCIES TOWARDS ENTREPRENUERIAL SUCCESS. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Noor, S., Isa, F. M., & Shafiq, A. (2022). Entrepreneurial Success: Key Challenges Faced by Malaysian Women Entrepreneurs in the Aged Care Industry. Business Perspectives and Research, 22785337221087481. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Rashid, S., & Ratten, V. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystems during COVID-19: The survival of small businesses using dynamic capabilities. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-09-2020-0110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Rosepti, P., & Niasari, C. (2022). Female Entrepreneurship in Leading Digitalization as a Marketing Strategy for Prosperous MSMEs and Women’s Empowerment: A Case Study of Latifa Indonesia. Muslim Business and Economics Review, 1(2), 305–323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Ruth Eikhof, D., & Warhurst, C. (2013). The promised land? Why social inequalities are systemic in the creative industries. Employee Relations, 35(5), 495–508. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Sadrnabavi, F., & Daneshvar, H. (2023). Lived experiences of successful women entrepreneurs (SMEs) in Iran: A feminist phenomenological study. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 15(5), 712–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-12-2021-0198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Santhosh Kumar, K., & Aithal, P. S. (2024). Influence of Digital Technology on Microfinance Sector: A Study in Kerala. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 8(2), 186–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Sapiai, N. S., Ishak, F. M., Rahman, K. A., Nawi, H. M., & Baker, R. (2025). Empowering Malaysian Women Entrepreneurs: Analyzing the Role of Socio-Cultural Factors and Support Systems in Emerging Markets. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 15(SI1). https://journal.uitm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JIKM/article/view/6142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Schulte-Holthaus, S., & Kuckertz, A. (2020). Passion, performance and concordance in rock “n” roll entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(6), 1335–1355. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2020-0067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Setiawan, B., Phan, T. D., Medina, J., Wieriks, M., Nathan, R. J., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2024). Quest for financial inclusion via digital financial services (Fintech) during COVID-19 pandemic: Case study of women in Indonesia. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 29(2), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-023-00217-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Simarasl, N., Tabesh, P., Munyon, T. P., & Marzban, Z. (2024). Unveiled confidence: Exploring how institutional support enhances the entrepreneurial self-efficacy and performance of female entrepreneurs in constrained contexts. European Management Journal, 42(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.07.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Stossier, T. (2023). Female Solo-Entrepreneurs: Coping Strategies for Handling the Challenges and Double Burden of Business and Private Life. Springer Nature. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=0d2mEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=related:ctZcmJy212wJ:scholar.google.com/&ots=302EvZRunt&sig=kVlfyyaTinta8D_cO3YlPz50xT8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Sufian, I., Fernandez, D., Zaki, H. O., Rosli, N., Johar, E. R., & Jamaludin, N. A. (2022). Motivation to Grow Women Entrepreneurs’ Home-Based Businesses. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(8), e001650–e001650. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. the star. (2024). Don’t underestimate rural indigenous women, says Malaysian anthropologist | The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/lifestyle/family/2024/01/12/don039t-underestimate-rural-indigenous-women-says-malaysian-anthropologist [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Tillmar, M., Sköld, B., Ahl, H., Berglund, K., & Pettersson, K. (2022). Women’s rural businesses: For economic viability or gender equality? – a database study from the Swedish context. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-06-2021-0091 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Wulandari, P., & Hj. Kassim, S. (2024). Empowering female entrepreneurs through access to digital microfinance services. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJGE-04-2024-0130/full/html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar