The Socioeconomic Consequences of Inmates Congestion in Okitipupa Federal Correctional Centre, Ondo State, Nigeria

Authors

Adeyemi Akinmoladun

Public Administration Department, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo, Ondo State (Nigeria)

Dr. Olumuyiwa Alabi (Ph.D)

Quantity Surveying Department, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo, Ondo State (Nigeria)

Dr. David Toyin Aladejebi

Social Studies Department, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Ondo State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700143

Subject Category: Criminology

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 1975-1983

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-11

Accepted: 2026-07-16

Published: 2026-07-27

Abstract

This study employed a quantitative research design to examine the socioeconomic consequences of inmate congestion at Okitipupa Federal Correctional Centre in Ondo State, Nigeria. Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to inmates and correctional officers to capture both experiential and administrative perspectives on overcrowding. A stratified sampling technique ensured fair representation, resulting in 31 valid responses from an initial sample of 40 participants. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequency distributions, percentages, means, and standard deviations, with the aid of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 25.0).
Findings revealed that inmate congestion significantly undermines inmates’ physical health, contributing to the spread of infections, epidemics, and skin diseases. Overcrowding was also found to increase institutional stress, promote tension and dehumanization among awaiting-trial inmates, and heighten the likelihood of jailbreaks and breakdown of discipline. Furthermore, congestion limits access to welfare services and rehabilitation programs, thereby weakening reintegration outcomes and exposing inmates to criminogenic influences. Although moderate agreement was observed regarding its role in worsening criminal behavior, respondents expressed divergent views on its relationship with inmates’ sexual behavior. Importantly, non-custodial measures were widely recognized as effective alternatives for promoting rehabilitation and reducing congestion.
The study concludes that inmate congestion is a structural and operational challenge with far-reaching implications for correctional efficiency, inmate welfare, and societal reintegration. It recommends integrated reforms, including infrastructural expansion, strengthened policy implementation, capacity building for correctional officers, and increased adoption of non-custodial sentencing measures.

Keywords

Inmate congestion, Socioeconomic consequences, Correctional centres, strain theory, Nigeria

Downloads

References

1. Adebayo, O. S., & Abiodun, T. F. (2021). Socioeconomic costs of prison congestion in Nigeria: Implications for correctional administration. Journal of Social Policy and Society, 18(2), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aghedo, I., & Eke, S. (2022). Prison congestion, justice system failure, and socioeconomic instability in Nigeria. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies, 15(1), 45–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Agnew, R., & Brezina, T. (2019). General strain theory: Evolution and overview. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Akinfenwa, S. (2022). Overcrowding in Nigerian prisons: Judicial delays and human rights concerns. Nigerian Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 89–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alemika, E. E. O., & Chukwuma, I. C. (2019). Prison conditions, capital punishment and deterrence in Nigeria. Centre for Law Enforcement Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Broidy, L. (2019). Gender and general strain theory: A critique. Feminist Criminology, 14(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085118795050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cullen, F. T., Agnew, R., & Wilcox, P. (2021). Criminological theory: Past to present (6th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fazel, S., Seewald, K., & Yu, R. (2025). Health consequences of prison overcrowding: Evidence from global correctional systems. The Lancet Public Health, 10(1), e15–e27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Joseph, A., Olanrewaju, O., & Adebanjo, K. (2021). Prison overcrowding trend in Nigeria and policy implications on health. International Journal of Criminal Justice Studies, 6(2), 99–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (2012). Crime and the American dream (5th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. National Correctional Service (2022). Annual report on custodial centre operations. Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Obioha, E. E. (2020). Prison overcrowding in Nigeria: The human rights implications. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 22(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ogbanga, M., & Bukie, K. (2024). Correctional institutions (prison) congestion and the health implication of inmates in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Social Sciences, 20(1), 76–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Olabamiji, T. (2025). Implications of overcrowding for offender rehabilitation at the Ado-Ekiti Correctional Center. Journal of Correctional Education and Rehabilitation, 12(1), 33–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oladipo, A., & Akinyemi, F. (2021). Judicial inefficiency and the persistence of prison congestion in Nigeria. African Journal of Law and Society, 8(2), 58–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Okunola, R. (2022). Prison congestion and community insecurity in Nigeria. International Journal of Security and Development Studies, 9(3), 145–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ogbanga, M., & Bukie, K. (2024). Correctional institutions (prison) congestion and the health implication of inmates in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Social Sciences, 20(1), 76–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Walmsley, R. (2023). World prison population list (14th ed.). Institute for Crime & Justice Policy Research. https://www.prisonstudies.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Western, B., & Pettit, B. (2010). Incarceration and social inequality. Daedalus, 139(3), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles