The Synergy of Success: Organizational Management, Staff Professionalism, Transformational Leadership as Drivers of State University Productivity

By examining the interplay between internal organizational drivers – organizational management, staff professionalism, and transformational leadership – this study sought to understand how institutions navigate the “tri-focal” demands of instruction, research, and community involvement. Using a descriptive-correlational research design, the study analyzed perspectives from 325 higher education faculty members across four premier state universities in Region X, Northern Mindanao, Philippines. The findings revealed a compelling “Management Paradox.” Although many universities cling to traditional bureaucratic structures for stability, a flexible, systems-oriented approach is perceived as more effective for managing modern institutional challenges. Results indicate a strong, statistically significant positive correlation between all predictor variables and institutional productivity, with coefficients (r) ranging from 0.639 to 0.783. However, while these associations are robust, they represent perceived interconnectedness rather than established causation. To enhance the objectivity of future assessments, it is recommended that subsequent research incorporate quantifiable metrics such as publication counts, extension income, and formal accreditation levels

institutional productivity, organizational management paradigms

1. Shahabuddin, M. (2022). An interactive guide to performing well in the QS World University Rankings. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14850.56006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. ASEAN Secretariat. (2022, July). ASEAN Higher Education Space 2025. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/ASEAN-Higher-Education-Space-2025_rev-1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Department of Budget and Management. (2022, May 25). National Budget Circular No. 589: Revised rates of representation and transportation allowances (RATA). https://www.dbm.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/Issuances/2022/National-Budget-Circular/NATIONAL-BUDGET-CIRCULAR-NO-589-DATED-MAY-25-2022.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Regadio, C. Q., Jr., & Tullao, T.S., Jr. (2015). The role of the government in enhancing research productivity of SUCs and private HEIs in the Philippines. Researchgate.net. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2591.2161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Liquido, M. G. E. (2018). The accreditation of state universities and colleges in the Philippines: Governance, hegemony relationship and dichotomy of ownership. Basic Research Journal of Education Research and Review, 1(1), 6–17. http://www.basicresearchjournals.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Sulasula, J., & Moreno, F. (2023, July 26). Public service delivery system in state universities and colleges: Controversies and best practices across frontline services. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4521207 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Indama, A.C., & Salain, S.A. (2023). The extent of bureaucratic red-tape in selected frontline services of Basilan State College: Its impact to public service delivery. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications (IJMRAP), 5(10), 126-132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Vasudevan, H. (2021). Resource-based view theory application on the educational service quality. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 6(6), 174-186. https://doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2021.v06i06.026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Silva, R.O., Ferreira, J.A., Souza, S.S., Soares, M.L., & Silva, D.D. (2021). The resource-based vision as a management instrument in the institutionalization of distance education in higher education / A visão baseada em recursos como instrumento de gestão na institucionalização da educação a distância no ensino superior. Brazilian Journal of Business, 3(1), 477-493. https://doi.org/10.34140/bjbv3n4-022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Amie-Ogan, T.O & Pepple, E.A. (2021). Human capital development for enhancing academic staff performance in universities in Rivers State. International Journal of Innovative Development and Policy Studies, 9(2), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Khan, H., Rehmat, M., Butt, T. H., Farooqi, S., & Asim, J. (2020). Impact of transformational leadership on work performance, burnout and social loafing: a mediation model. Future Business Journal, 6(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-020-00043-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Moreno-Freites, Z., & Pérez-Ortega, G. (2019). Model of relationship of transformational leadership and university management. DYNA, 86(210), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v86n210.78035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Azarcon, R.O. (2019). Transformational leadership and bureaucracy in a state university: Can they work together? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rufino, A. J., Federio, R. H., Bermillo, M. A., & Tus, J. (2022). The social support and its relationship to the college students’ burnout amidst the online learning modality. Psych Education, 2022(PEMJ0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6534345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Makwana, D., Engineer, P., Dabhi, A., & Chudasama, H. (2023). Sampling methods in research: A review. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 7(3), 762–768. https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd57470.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ferdous, J. (2016). Organization theories: From classical perspective. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 9(2), 1-7. https://www.ijbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/K9_11.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dziak, M. (2024). Classical management theory. EBSCO. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/business-and-management/classical-management-theory [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 149–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60051-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Garima (2019). Global journal of engineering science and researches: Overview of classical and neo-classical theory of management. Global Journal of Engineering Science and Researches, 6(6), 239-242. https://www.gjesr.com/Issues%20PDF/Archive-2019/June-2019/IDSTM-2019/35.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Miles, M. (2022, October 3). Redefining professionalism in the workplace. BetterUp. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.betterup.com/blog/redefining-professionalism [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Brewster, L., Jones, E., Priestley, M., Wilbraham, S. J., Spanner, L., & Hughes, G. (2022). Look after the staff and they would look after the students’ cultures of wellbeing and mental health in the university setting. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(4), 548-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1986473. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lamri, J., & Lubart, T. (2023). Reconciling hard skills and soft skills in a common framework: The generic skills component approach. Journal of Intelligence, 11(6), Article 107. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/11/6/107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hollenbaugh, E. E. (2021). Self-presentation in social media: Review and research opportunities. Review of communication research, 9, 80. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d12/7a9b52c62fc77b6ee37478e9bdbb796e88a7.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Dong, M., van Prooijen, J. W., & van Lange, P. A. (2024). Status cues and moral judgment: Formal attire induces moral favoritism but not for hypocrites. Current Psychology, 43(21), 19247-19263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05747-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Karim, M., Choudhury, M., & Bin Latif, W. (2019). The impact of training and development on employees’ performance: An analysis of quantitative data. The International Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(1) 25-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Institute of Behavioral Research. (2009). Survey of Transformational Leadership (TCU STL). Texas Christian University. https://ibr.tcu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/tcom-STL-S-sg.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. AACCUP. (2014) Survey Questionnaire for BS Accountancy. AACCUP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mcleod, S. (2023). Likert scale questionnaire: examples and analysis. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/likert-scale.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wilson, L. T. (2018). Pearson Product-Moment Correlation. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Pearson-Product-Moment-Correlation-Wilson/053c33b2b2df774a9342e5ee42cb46a44af514a4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Woelert, P., & Stensaker, B. (2025). Strategic bureaucracy: The convergence of bureaucratic and strategic management logics in the organizational restructuring of universities. Minerva, 63(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09535-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Suntsova, O. (2025). Evolution of management theories in the context of business communication. Financial and Credit Systems: Prospects for Development, 3(3), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.26565/2786-4995-2025-3-17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Talaoui, Y. (2023). The situation of incommensurability in strategic management. Symphonya Emerging Issues in Management, 24(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.4468/2023.01.06talaoui [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Luchko, H., & Duhin, O. (2024). The paradoxical nature of organizational change company: A theoretical foundation and key concepts. Ekonomika ta Suspilstvo, (64). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-64-78 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Uy, G., Tiu, T., & Garcia, D. (2025). Enhancing security workforce efficiency: Investigating stress, attitudes, and performance dynamics. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 31(2), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2025/v31i21269 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Partoza, A. F., & Urbina, M. C. (2025). Workplace stress, work attitude and job satisfaction of clinic-based radiologic technologists in the province of Laguna. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v14-i2/25237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Apdian, V. G. & Prado, N. I. (2024). Transformational leadership, cultural intelligence, self-efficacy, and productivity among higher education faculty: A structural model. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 55(1), 203-233. https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v55i1.876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Habeeb, Y. O., & Eyupoglu, S. (2024). Strategic planning, transformational leadership and organization performance: Driving forces for sustainability in higher education in Nigeria. Sustainability, 16(11), 4348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Corral, M. D. O. (2025). Transformational leadership qualities, performance of school administrators and teachers self-efficacy: Basis for transformational leadership model. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 10(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i6s.742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Whittaker, J. A., & Montgomery, B. (2025). Reimagining a path from institutional willingness to readiness: Ecosystem variables that promote or impede sustainable transformation in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1571030. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1571030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Johnson, L. D. (2025). Measuring globalization in higher education: Developing a scorecard for social impact and academic excellence. Global Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.63665/gjis.v1.23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Fu, Y. (2024). Optimising curriculum quality assessment in application-oriented universities: A student-centric approach using entropy and cloud model. European Journal of Education, 59(4), 793–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12801 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Mabwe, K., Jaffar, K., Chiyaka, E. T., & Sithole, A. (2025). Mapping the global landscape of student support services in higher education: A scoping review. Journal of Studies in Education, 15(4), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v15i4.23203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Chavez, J. (2025). Exploring faculty and research development strategies among top-ranked VISMIN universities in the Asian University rankings. Journal of Education and Social Sciences Research, 2(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.62596/j34e0m77 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Yamoah, E., Offei-gyekyi, F., & Forson, J. (2024). Enhancing workplace productivity: The nexus of organizational culture and policies in public institutions. Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.46287/nfhx9342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Wellem, I., Budiyanto, & Suwitho. (2025). Professionalism and workload on performance: OCB as a moderator. Management Business and Research Quarterly, 3(4), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.32038/mbrq.2025.34.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Cahyono, N. D. (2024). Enhancing organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership: A comprehensive analysis. Global Journal of Economic and Business, 2(8), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i8.270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Palla, R. S., Kalita, T., Muniswamy, B. K., & Vinothalakshmi, J. (2025). The impact of transformational leadership on employee motivation and organizational performance. International Journal of Management, Business and Trade, 1(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.63856/btjtqn05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Andersen, R., Thomakos, D., & Wood, G. (2025). Common method variance (CMV) bias: Its implications, how to detect it, and how to handle it. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 36(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2025.2537161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Leadership Practices And Stakeholders’ Commitment in Schools’ Delivery Services
• Literacy Leadership of Public Secondary School Heads and the Implementation of Reading Programs: Basis for Intervention