The Utwala Mseto Model: African Polycentric Governance — A Comparative Synthesis of Traditional African, Constitutional-Democratic and Swiss Governance

African states continue to face a persistent problem of institutional fit: constitutional structures inherited from colonial state formation coexist uneasily with chiefs, customary councils and community-based authorities that retain social legitimacy but may also be hereditary and insufficiently contestable. This study addresses the question of which governance principles, drawn from traditional African political systems, constitutional democracy and Swiss governance, can be synthesised into an Africa-relevant system of polycentric stewardship governance, without assuming the superiority of any single tradition. Adopting an interpretivist, comparative-historical and conceptual-synthesis design, the study applies structured, focused comparison to five historical African polities (Aksum, Wagadou, Mapungubwe, Munhumutapa and Buganda), African constitutional-democratic experience, and the Swiss federal model, coding each against eleven common institutional criteria before synthesising compatible principles through conceptual framework analysis. Findings, presented in a Cross-Model Coding Matrix spanning thirteen themes, show a differentiated rather than uniform pattern of recurrence: contextual institutional adaptation and institutional continuity are genuine tri-model universals; accountability, participation and diversity accommodation are strongly but unevenly supported; equal citizenship and contestable leadership are points of substantive divergence best supplied intact by constitutional democracy; and stewardship and legitimacy emerge as composite principles requiring reconstruction from partial contributions across all three traditions. These findings are synthesised into the Utwala Mseto Model, an applied expression of African Polycentric Stewardship Governance (APSG) that combines socially embedded legitimacy with equal citizenship, polycentric and subsidiary authority, collegial and contestable leadership, multi-layered accountability, and stewardship of collective resources. The study's principal contribution is methodological and theoretical: it demonstrates that governance synthesis across historically distinct traditions is best achieved through principled, evidence-based allocation of institutional elements to their best-substantiated source rather than additive blending. The model requires further empirical validation through fieldwork and cross-national testing, but offers both a replicable comparative method and a substantive framework for governance reform in politically and culturally plural African states.

Polycentric Governance; Stewardship Theory; Traditional African Governance; Constitutional Democracy; Subsidiarity; Comparative-Historical Analysis

1. Abebe, A. K. (2024). The (il)legitimacy of constitutional amendments in Africa and democratic backsliding. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 19(3), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2024.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baldwin, E., Thiel, A., McGinnis, M. D., & Kellner, E. (2024). Empirical research on polycentric governance: Critical gaps and a framework for studying long-term change. Policy Studies Journal, 52(2), 319–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12518 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baldwin, K. (2025). Traditional authorities around the world: Toward a better understanding of their de facto power, downward accountability, and state recognition. Annual Review of Political Science, 28, 95–114. Publisher record [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baldwin, K., & Holzinger, K. (2019). Traditional political institutions and democracy: Reassessing their compatibility and accountability. Comparative Political Studies, 52(12), 1747–1774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019852686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bard, K. A., & Manzo, A. (2025). Excavations on Bieta Giyorgis Hill, Aksum and evidence for the origins and development of the Aksumite Kingdom. Journal of Field Archaeology, 50(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2024.2430088. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bard, K. A., Fattovich, R., Manzo, A., & Perlingieri, C. (2014). The chronology of Aksum (Tigrai, Ethiopia): A view from Bieta Giyorgis. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa, 49(3), 285–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/0067270X.2014.943484. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beach, D. N. (1980). The Shona and Zimbabwe, 900–1850: An outline of Shona history. Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Berardo, R., & Lubell, M. (2016). Understanding what shapes a polycentric governance system. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 738–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12532 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2010). The state as cultural practice. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bin’Omukama, R. K. (2026). Democracy as ceremony: Electoral ritual and the politics of legitimacy in East Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096261468575 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Carstensen, M. B., & Röper, N. (2022). The other side of agency: Bricolage and institutional continuity. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(8), 1288–1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1148203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cheeseman, N., & Sishuwa, S. (2021). African studies keyword: Democracy. African Studies Review, 64(3), 704–732. https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2021.43 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cheeseman, N., Desrosiers, M.-E., & Selormey, E. E. (2026). Rethinking pathways of autocratisation and democratic resilience in comparative perspective. Government and Opposition, 61, Article e29. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2026.10050. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chirikure, S., Hall, S., & Rehren, T. (2015). When ceramic sociology meets material science: Sociological and technological aspects of crucibles and pottery from Mapungubwe, southern Africa. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 40, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2015.05.004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chirikure, S., Manyanga, M., Pikirayi, I., & Pollard, A. M. (2015). New pathways of sociopolitical complexity in southern Africa. African Archaeological Review, 32(4), 655–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-015-9197-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Crawford, G. (2009). “Making democracy a reality”? The politics of decentralisation and the limits to local democracy in Ghana. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 27(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589000802576699. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dahlberg, M., & Söderberg, C. (2024). Nuancing the spheres of authority of chiefs: State perspectives on hybrid governance. Governance, 37(2), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12786 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Davis, J. M., & Turnbull, M. (2024). Nigerian youth engagement in violent electoral environments: Political apathy or “constrained optimism”? African Affairs, 123(491), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adae010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. De Kadt, D., & Larreguy, H. A. (2018). Agents of the regime? Traditional leaders and electoral politics in South Africa. The Journal of Politics, 80(2), 382–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/694540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Dueppen, S. A. (2025). Reconnecting the forest, savanna, and Sahel in West Africa: The sociopolitical implications of a long-networked past. Journal of Archaeological Research, 33, 337–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-024-09201-w. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Dzordzormenyoh, M. K. (2024). Balancing the decentralization scale in Ghana to promote political decentralization: A perspective on local government election in the Fourth Republic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Emmenegger, P. (2021). Agency in historical institutionalism: Coalitional work in the creation, maintenance, and change of institutions. Theory and Society, 50(4), 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09433-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Faboye, S., Gumbo, T., & Sebola-Samanyanga, J. (2024). Polycentric governance: Evaluating the relevance of traditional authorities in good governance in South Africa. Town and Regional Planning, 85, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.38140/trp.v85i.8425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Fage, J. D. (1957). Ancient Ghana: A review of the evidence. Transactions of the Historical Society of Ghana, 3(2), 3–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Fattovich, R. (2010). The development of ancient states in the northern Horn of Africa, c. 3000 BC–AD 1000: An archaeological outline. Journal of World Prehistory, 23(3), 145–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-010-9035-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Føllesdal, A. (1998). Survey article: Subsidiarity. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(2), 190–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Fortes, M., & Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (Eds.). (1987). African political systems. KPI. (Original work published 1940) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Freiburghaus, R., & Mueller, S. (2024). Switzerland, quo vadis? Current challenges and potential solutions for Swiss politics. In P. Emmenegger, F. Fossati, S. Häusermann, Y. Papadopoulos, P. Sciarini, & A. Vatter (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Swiss politics (pp. 773–794). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192871787.013.40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Freiburghaus, R., & Vatter, A. (2026). Direkte Demokratie in der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft. In M. Kneuer, G. Pickel, & S. Pickel (Eds.), Handbuch vergleichende Politikwissenschaft (pp. 1–20). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02993-7_35-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Gayoye, M. (2024). “Constitutions without constitutionalism” and judicial leadership in Kenya. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 18(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2024.2375076. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Gayoye, M. (2024). “Constitutions without constitutionalism” and judicial leadership in Kenya. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 18(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2024.2375076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Gebeye, B. A. (2026). Jurisdemocracy: An approach to constitutionalism in the postcolony. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moag079. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Gebeye, B. A. (2026). Jurisdemocracy: An approach to constitutionalism in the postcolony. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moag079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Gestrich, N. (2019). The Empire of Ghana. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.396. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Hanson, H. E. (2003). Landed obligation: The practice of power in Buganda. Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Hanson, H. E. (2009). Mapping conflict: Heterarchy and accountability in the ancient capital of Buganda. The Journal of African History, 50(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853709990065. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Harding, R. (2020). Rural democracy: Elections and development in Africa. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Hegsvold, K. (2026). Collective decision-making and institutional configurations in polycentric environmental governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 1–16. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70091. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Henn, S. J. (2023). Complements or substitutes? How institutional arrangements bind traditional authorities and the state in Africa. American Political Science Review, 117(3), 871–890. Author publication record [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Henn, S. J., & Robinson, J. A. (2025). Africa as a success story: Political organization in pre-colonial Africa (NBER Working Paper No. 34546). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w34546. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Hernandez, M. (2012). Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Hurter, J., Antonites, A., Lindahl, A., & Ashley, C. (2025). Compositional analysis of c. thirteenth-century AD Mapungubwe ceramics in South Africa: Regional, local and household connections. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 17, Article 221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-025-02320-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Khisa, M., & Bareebe, G. (2024). Elites’ attitudes and perceptions in shaping Uganda–Rwanda relations. In J. Kagoro, J. Friesinger, & K. Schlichte (Eds.), The foreign policies of East African states (pp. 89–111). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003507222-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Kincaid, J. (2010). Federalism and democracy: Comparative empirical and theoretical perspectives. In M. Burgess & A.-G. Gagnon (Eds.), Federal democracies (pp. 299–324). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Koter, D. (2023). Africa and ethnic politics. Nationalities Papers, 51(2), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2022.86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Levtzion, N. (1973). Ancient Ghana and Mali. Methuen. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Levtzion, N., & Hopkins, J. F. P. (Eds.). (2000). Corpus of early Arabic sources for West African history. Markus Wiener Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Linder, W., & Mueller, S. (2021). Swiss democracy: Possible solutions to conflict in multicultural societies (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Linder, W., & Mueller, S. (2021). Swiss democracy: Possible solutions to conflict in multicultural societies (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63266-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Manyanga, M., Nyamushosho, R. T., Mukwende, T., & Chirikure, S. (2026). Early state formation in southern Africa: A reappraisal. Annual Review of Anthropology, 55. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041224-121751 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. McIntosh, S. K., & Conrad, D. C. (2017). Early states of the Western Sudan. In T. Spear (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in African studies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199846733-0061. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Michalopoulos, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2015). Further evidence on the link between pre-colonial political centralization and comparative economic development in Africa. Economics Letters, 126, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.11.018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Moroni, S. (2024). Revisiting subsidiarity: Not only administrative decentralization but also multidimensional polycentrism. Cities, 155, Article 105463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105463. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Morrison, T. H., Bodin, Ö., Cumming, G. S., Lubell, M., Seppelt, R., Seppelt, T., & Weible, C. M. (2023). Building blocks of polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12492. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Mudenge, S. I. G. (1988). A political history of Munhumutapa, c. 1400–1902. Zimbabwe Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Mueller, S. (2022). The paradox of cooperation: Intergovernmental relations and identity conflict in Switzerland. In Y. T. Fessha, K. Kössler, & F. Palermo (Eds.), Intergovernmental relations in divided societies (pp. 1–29). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88785-8_1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Munro-Hay, S. C. (1991). Aksum: An African civilisation of late antiquity. Edinburgh University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Oryema, L., & Kumbu, A. A. (2024). Certificates of occupancy: A bridge on Mailo land in Uganda. African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, 7(5), 1243–1256. https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v7i5.50776. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952530 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Phillipson, D. W. (2003). Aksum: An archaeological introduction and guide. British Institute in Eastern Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Phillipson, D. W. (2012). Foundations of an African civilisation: Aksum and the northern Horn, 1000 BC–AD 1300. James Currey. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. Wiley-Interscience. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Ragin, C. C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Reid, R. J. (2002). Political power in pre-colonial Buganda: Economy, society and warfare in the nineteenth century. James Currey. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Salomonsen, H. H., Schillemans, T., & Brummel, L. (2024). Aligning the steering of governmental organizations: A comparative mixed-methods study in Denmark using stewardship theory. Public Management Review, 26(11), 3320–3341. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2332778. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Steyn, B., & Antonites, A. (2025). Cultivating complexity: Thirteenth-century AD crop systems and wild plant utilization, South Africa. African Archaeological Review, 42(3), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-025-09628-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Tambe, E. B., & Ngubu, F. (2026). More mobilisation, same targets: Party system institutionalisation and party outreach in Africa. Democratization, 1–27. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2026.2687769. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. The manuscript should cite this as Manyanga et al. (2026), not “Manyanga and Nyamushosho (2026),” because the publication has four authors. The publisher records it as an in-press Volume 55 article. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Udombana, N. (2024). Reflections on constitutionalism and democratic governance in Africa. Journal of African Law, 68(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855324000019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Vatter, A. (2023). Federalism. In P. Emmenegger, F. Fossati, S. Häusermann, Y. Papadopoulos, P. Sciarini, & A. Vatter (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Swiss politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192871787.013.5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Vatter, A., Freiburghaus, R., & Arens, A. (2020). Coming a long way: Switzerland’s transformation from a majoritarian to a consensus democracy (1848–2018). Democratization, 27(6), 970–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1755264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Wrigley, C. (1996). Kingship and state: The Buganda dynasty. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
• Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
• Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
• Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
• Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions