The West Asia Conflict and Its Impact on Maritime Affairs: A Geopolitical, Blue Economy and Empirical Sectoral Analysis

Ongoing geopolitical tensions in West Asia, particularly in strategic areas such as the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal, and the Red Sea, have sparked major concerns over the stability of global maritime trade. This study aims to analyse the dynamics of conflict in the region by adopting a mixed-methods approach that blends qualitative content analysis with quantitative empirical data to systematically assess its impact on the world's maritime industry. Moving beyond broad generalizations, this analysis differentiates the vulnerabilities and resilience levels across specific shipping sectors (container vs. energy), geographical trade routes, and developing economies. The findings show that such conflicts cause significant disruptions to global supply chains, sharp increases in the cost of ship insurance (war risk premiums), and shipping route diversions that increase operating costs and carbon emissions. In addition, threats to maritime security such as drone attacks and pirates at choke points have forced a realignment of international logistics strategies. The study concludes that instability in West Asia not only threatens global energy security, but also demands stronger multilateral cooperation and data-driven risk modelling in strengthening the resilience of maritime infrastructure. The implications of this study provide guidance for policymakers and industry players to devise more effective, sector-specific contingency plans in dealing with future geopolitical risks.

West Asia Conflict, Global Maritime Industry, Maritime Security

1. Al-Hajri, M. (2025). Geopolitics of the Middle East and maritime security. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. EIA. (2023). World oil transit chokepoints. U.S. Energy Information Administration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. IMO. (2024). Impact of regional conflicts on global shipping emissions. International Maritime Organization Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. International Chamber of Shipping. (2024). Global maritime security report: The evolution of asymmetric threats. ICS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. International Maritime Organization. (2024). Annual report on shipping risks and emissions. IMO Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. LMA/IUA. (2024). Joint war committee: Listed areas and risk assessment. Lloyd’s Market Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2018). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Rodrigue, J. P. (2025). The geography of transport systems (6th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Stopford, M. (2023). Maritime economics. Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. UNCTAD. (2024). Review of maritime transport: Navigating maritime supply chain disruptions. United Nations Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. World Bank. (2026). Global economic prospects: The maritime risk factor and supply chain resilience. World Bank Group [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
• Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
• Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
• Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
• Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria