Trait, Skill & Behavioral Theories: A Historical Review of Leadership Research

In this study, the evolution of leadership theory through a conceptual and analytical review of seminal and contemporary literature was examined. Drawing on 36 scholarly sources, it traces the progression of leadership thought from the deterministic assumptions of the Great Man Theory to more dynamic and context-sensitive approaches, including Trait, Skills, and Style theories. The analysis highlights a significant epistemological shift from leader-centric and essentialist perspectives toward relational, developmental, and socially embedded understandings of leadership. Critically, while each theory contributes important insights—traits explaining who leaders are, skills leaders can develop, and behaviors leaders exhibit—none provides a comprehensive explanation of leadership effectiveness on its own. Consequently, the study develops an Integrated Leadership Model (ILM), which conceptualizes leadership as a multidimensional process arising from the interaction among traits (being), skills (becoming), behaviors (doing), and context (situating). The findings demonstrate that leadership effectiveness is not determined by any single dimension but by the alignment and interaction among these elements. Therefore, the study advances a holistic and integrative framework that reconceptualises leadership as a dynamic, adaptive, and contextually embedded process. This framework provides a more comprehensive foundation for understanding and developing leadership in complex organisational environments, bridging the gap between traditional theories and contemporary leadership challenges.

Great Man Leadership theory, Trait Leadership Theory, Style Leadership theory, Managerial Grid

1. Afzal, F., & Tumpa, R. J. (2024). Exploring leadership styles for sustainability: A systematic review. Sustainability, 16(3), 971. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030971 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agazu, B., & Debela, K. (2024). Leadership effectiveness: A systematic literature review. Library Leadership & Management, 38(1). https://llm.corejournals.org/llm/article/view/7611 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amallia, C., & Wardi, Y. (2025). Systematic literature review of leadership theories and styles. Research Horizon. https://lifescifi.com/journal/index.php/RH/article/view/954 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Borde, P. S., Arora, R., & Kakoty, S. (2024). Leadership styles and organizational commitment: A review. European Journal of Training and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bowden, A. O. (1926). A study of the personality of student leaders in colleges in the United States. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 21(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007/2020). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chaiyasat, C., Petchsawang, P., & Simha, A. (2025). Ethical leadership: An integrative review. Public Integrity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Crevani, L., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2010). Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2009.12.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Day, D. V., Riggio, R. E., Tan, S. J., & Conger, J. A. (2021). Advancing leadership theory and research: A review of 25 years. The Leadership Quarterly. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. De Neve, J. E., Mikhaylov, S., Dawes, C. T., Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Born to lead? A twin design and genetic association study of leadership role occupancy. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2018). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction. Academy of Management Review, 43(2), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Denis, J. L., Langley, A., & Sergi, V. (2021). Leadership in the plural. Human Relations, 74(6), 789–813. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dhamija, P., Chiarini, A., & Shapla, S. (2023). Impact of leadership styles on organizational performance. The TQM Journal, 35(1), 210–230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Doan, T. T., & Wu, C. (2026). Adaptive leadership and organizational outcomes. Journal of Business Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Farhan, W., Chaudhry, I. S., & Razmak, J. (2024). Leaders’ behavioral approach in the digital era. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Frankenhuis, W. E., & Panchanathan, K. (2023). Balancing model complexity and explanatory power in leadership theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Grossman, R. (2019). Trait-based leadership reconsidered: A review and critique. Journal of Leadership Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Katsande, F. (2021). Leadership being and identity: A conceptual perspective. Journal of Leadership Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. King, A. S. (1990). Evolution of leadership theory. Vikalpa, 15(2), 43–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2006). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. (2019). Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 148–187. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lord, R. G., Day, D. V., Zaccaro, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2020). Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., et al. (2000/2018). Leadership skills and capabilities: A review. The Leadership Quarterly. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Onia, S. I. (2025). Evaluation of leadership theories in education. Journal of Educational and Management Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Peters, T. J. (2023). Leadership and excellence in organizations. Harvard Business Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Annen, H. (2020). Beyond general intelligence: Cultural intelligence and leadership effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Setyawibawa, I., & Tahir, R. (2025). Leadership behavior and organizational effectiveness. Management Science Letters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Singh, P. K., Singh, S., & Kumari, V. (2024). Leadership theories in modern organizations. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 35–71. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Tourish, D. (2019). Is complexity leadership theory complex enough? Leadership, 15(2), 219–238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Udin, U. (2024). Leadership styles and sustainable performance. Multidisciplinary Reviews. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Yukl, G. (2019). Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zaccaro, S. J., Kemp, C., & Bader, P. (2018). Leader traits and attributes. In The nature of leadership (pp. 101–124). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Understanding Academic Leadership: Theory, Practice and Future Horizons
• A Literature Review on Leadership and Cultural Evolution of Adventism in East Africa Region
• Unlocking Employee Creativity Through Empowering Leadership: The Dynamic Interplay of Trust and Engagement
• The Integration of Preachers’ Leadership Competencies in Empowering Preachers for the Orang Asli Community in Malaysia
• Traditional Authority vs. Legacy Leadership: A Comparative Literature Review from the Arab World